Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save bastosmichael/2a5293371f9b32e5bb2411538ba982ea to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save bastosmichael/2a5293371f9b32e5bb2411538ba982ea to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Request for Comment (RFC) Template for Software Engineering Teams
Below is a basic RFC (Request for Comment) template suitable for software engineering teams working on Federal projects:
---
## **RFC: [Your Proposal Name]**
**RFC Number:** [Unique number or identifier for the RFC]
**Date:** [Creation date]
**Author:** [Your Name]
**Status:** [Draft, In Review, Accepted, Rejected, etc.]
**Targeted Release:** [Specific release or version for the change]
---
### **1. Introduction**
_Briefly describe the problem or the situation that has prompted this RFC._
---
### **2. Background**
_Describe the current state of the system, process, or module that you intend to change. This could include relevant historical context, technical constraints, or any other information that might provide context._
---
### **3. Proposed Change**
_Detailed description of the proposed changes, which might include:_
- Code changes
- Architectural changes
- Data structure changes
- Interface or API changes
- Any new components or tools
---
### **4. Rationale**
_Why is this change being proposed? What are the benefits? Discuss the pros and cons._
---
### **5. Security Considerations**
_As this is for the Department of Defense, it's imperative to consider security implications._
- **Threat Analysis**: What threats might this change introduce or expose?
- **Mitigation Strategies**: How will these threats be mitigated?
---
### **6. Compatibility & Migration Plan**
_How will this change impact existing systems? How can the transition be made smooth for users and developers?_
---
### **7. Testing & Validation**
_Outline how you plan to test the changes. Describe any new test cases or modifications to existing test cases._
---
### **8. Dependencies & Risks**
_List any dependencies this change might have on other systems or components, as well as potential risks that might arise._
---
### **9. Alternatives Considered**
_Have other solutions or approaches been considered? Why were they rejected in favor of this proposal?_
---
### **10. Feedback**
_Summarize any feedback received from the team, stakeholders, or users. Document any major concerns or issues raised._
---
### **11. Decision**
_[For use after discussion and review]_
- **Decision Date**: [Date of the decision]
- **Outcome**: [Accepted, Rejected, Modified, etc.]
- **Comments**: [Any notes or comments related to the decision]
---
### **12. References**
_Any related documents, previous RFCs, or other reference materials that might be relevant._
---
Please note, while this template is designed to be comprehensive, specific projects or contexts might require additional sections or adjustments to this format. Always ensure your RFCs align with the specific requirements and guidelines of your organization or project.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment