Alexandre Bertails betehess

View sports195-coding-challenge
1 2 3 4 5 6
object~extends Application{case class T(n:String,r:Double){def+(t:T)={val p=t.r/(r+t.r);val(w,l)=if(p>0.5||(p==.5&&n<t.n))(this,t)else(t,this);w.copy(r=r+(w.r-r)/5)}
case class R(r:Int,a:T,b:T,w:T){override def toString=s"$r,${a.n},${b.n},${w.n}"}
def g(l:List[T]):List[(T,T)]=l match{case a::b::l⇒(a,b)::g(l);case _⇒Nil}
def p(l:List[(T,T)],r:Int,a:Seq[R]):Seq[R]{case(a,b)⇒val(c,d)=a|b;R(r,c,d,a+b)}match{case m::Nil⇒a:+m;case e⇒p(g(,r+1,a++e)}
println(p(",")).sortBy(_(5)).sortBy(_(4)).map{case Array(a,b,c,d,_,_)⇒(T(a,b.toDouble),T(c,d.toDouble))},1,Seq()).mkString("\n"))}
View gist:6713876
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
# TimBL's removes his certificate informations
AT ca:i / cert:key DELETE .
# TimBL removes the certificate exponent from his certificate
AT ca:i / cert:key / cert:exponent DELETE .
# TimBL update his certificate informations
AT ca:i / cert:key UPDATE [
rdf:type cert:RSAPublicKey;
cert:exponent 65537;
View gist:6684747

The Graph Literal section says the following

Concrete syntaxes MAY support simple literals, consisting of only a lexical form without any datatype IRI or language tag. Simple literals only exist in concrete syntaxes, and are treated as syntactic sugar for abstract syntax literals with the datatype IRI

In practice, it appears that both Jena and Sesame are broken in their handling of RDF Literals. They also break graph isomorphism for the same reasons.

View select.scala
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
* "Select" off the first future to be satisfied. Return this as a
* result, with the remainder of the Futures as a sequence.
* @param fs a scala.collection.Seq
def select[A](fs: Seq[Future[A]])(implicit ec: ExecutionContext): Future[(Try[A], Seq[Future[A]])] = {
def stripe(p: Promise[(Try[A], Seq[Future[A]])],
heads: Seq[Future[A]],
View gist:1406559
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Hi Donald (and Martin),
Thanks for pinging me; it's nice to know Typesafe is keeping tabs on this, and I
appreciate the tone. This is a Yegge-long response, but given that you and
Martin are the two people best-situated to do anything about this, I'd rather
err on the side of giving you too much to think about. I realize I'm being very
critical of something in which you've invested a great deal (both financially
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.