bgirardot/gist:f953e611d9f7d8ea1a0bf1433d9b2d17

## gistfile1.txt
<darkblue-b> BlakeGirardot: where is the 'portable openstreetmap package' master?
<BlakeGirardot> Kind of hoping it is something obvious to someone familiar with the stack.
<BlakeGirardot> Let me find out
<osmbot> [osm-id|master|Bryan Housel] Match '+' as-is (no shift, because shift '+' is '?' on some non-US keyboards) https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/commit/dffc354
<TomH> I would suggest your bundle is wrong
<TomH> Both Gemfile and Gemfile.lock should list canonical_rails - if they don't they you have a screwy setup
<TomH> sorry canonical-rails
<pnorman> BlakeGirardot: have you had success deploying openstreetmap-website first?
<BlakeGirardot> Ok, sorry, that first question trigged us for things to try... so... we are trying a few of those things and I am passing all these comments to David and Seth (devops and dev)
<BlakeGirardot> The trouble is we are really learning the osm stack as we go along here. The portable openstreetmap devs know it backward and forward, but us as consumers are still finding our way around the openstreetmap-website
<BlakeGirardot> (I feel like a Pakled but without the cunning)
<TomH> well this isn't really a question of learning anything - it seems you have a checkout that is not consistent
<TomH> ie you have config/initializers/canonical_rails.rb but you don't have the edits made to Gemfile in the same commit
<TomH> https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/commit/24271b75bda2a358a70db5fbbb44ea8a72ed8a13 to be precise
<osmbot> TomH: [osm-website|master|Tom Hughes] Use canonical-rails gem to generate canonical URLs http://git.osm.org/rails.git/commitdiff/24271b7
<BlakeGirardot> Oh very interesting TomH ok, let me pass that on.
<TomH> because you apparently don't have the canonical-rails gem loaded
<TomH> or you've done an update and not restarted properly so the wrong gem set is loaded
<TomH> but that depends on what application server you're using
<TomH> but then it wouldn't be rerunning the initializers so I don't think it can be that
	<darkblue-b> BlakeGirardot: where is the 'portable openstreetmap package' master?
	<BlakeGirardot> Kind of hoping it is something obvious to someone familiar with the stack.
	<BlakeGirardot> Let me find out
	<osmbot> [osm-id\|master\|Bryan Housel] Match '+' as-is (no shift, because shift '+' is '?' on some non-US keyboards) https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/commit/dffc354
	<TomH> I would suggest your bundle is wrong
	<TomH> Both Gemfile and Gemfile.lock should list canonical_rails - if they don't they you have a screwy setup
	<TomH> sorry canonical-rails
	<pnorman> BlakeGirardot: have you had success deploying openstreetmap-website first?
	<BlakeGirardot> Ok, sorry, that first question trigged us for things to try... so... we are trying a few of those things and I am passing all these comments to David and Seth (devops and dev)
	<BlakeGirardot> The trouble is we are really learning the osm stack as we go along here. The portable openstreetmap devs know it backward and forward, but us as consumers are still finding our way around the openstreetmap-website
	<BlakeGirardot> (I feel like a Pakled but without the cunning)
	<TomH> well this isn't really a question of learning anything - it seems you have a checkout that is not consistent
	<TomH> ie you have config/initializers/canonical_rails.rb but you don't have the edits made to Gemfile in the same commit
	<TomH> https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/commit/24271b75bda2a358a70db5fbbb44ea8a72ed8a13 to be precise
	<osmbot> TomH: [osm-website\|master\|Tom Hughes] Use canonical-rails gem to generate canonical URLs http://git.osm.org/rails.git/commitdiff/24271b7
	<BlakeGirardot> Oh very interesting TomH ok, let me pass that on.
	<TomH> because you apparently don't have the canonical-rails gem loaded
	<TomH> or you've done an update and not restarted properly so the wrong gem set is loaded
	<TomH> but that depends on what application server you're using
	<TomH> but then it wouldn't be rerunning the initializers so I don't think it can be that