Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@brianguertin
Last active January 11, 2017 21:11
Show Gist options
  • Save brianguertin/913c5014a962eaa5a0b565e1b256e709 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save brianguertin/913c5014a962eaa5a0b565e1b256e709 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Email
I received this text in an email:
"Google came from nowhere and bullied themselves into a superpower by stealing" - © Ben Ligeri
To which I responded with this question:
"No, everyone using their services has volunteered to do so. What have they done that constitutes stealing?"
@brianguertin
Copy link
Author

brianguertin commented Jan 6, 2017

Another person responded to our thread:

Ben, you say this scam has been inflicted on the world. China is a big part of the world and even Gmail doesn't work there. I would say you have to re-make your claim about just 75 percent of the population. Then if we can just subtract the places I've been to with no clean water never mind no WiFi we're probably down to 25 percent. Also Google's market share is not major in the super power Russia. America is a big market as is Europe. No one counts Canada and Australia. But I would consider Google's out reach less powerful in the world then you think. Facebook and Apple have a way bigger hold on my lifestyle than Google.

P.S. You can share re-share and post my comments. I claim no copyrights or rights to my words.

@BenjaminLigeri
Copy link

It's very simple. Google's rise to fortune has been the direct result of unlawfully monetizing the copyrighted works of others.

I wrote "I can simplify. Copyright law was created to protect copyright creators from the very thing Google did, making money off other peoples works."

Brian wrote "No, nearly every creation goes through a middle man that gets a profit. That is normal and expected; record studios, art galleries, movie theaters, etc.. Copyright only requires them to have your permission to do so."

I wrote "one of the points i thought i was making pretty strong was that they did not have permission. I never list my content on Google but it shows up there. Thats a very straightforward copyright violation."

So again, I ask, how can one not come to any other conclusion than.... Google rose to fortune and fame by the direct unlawful monetizing of other people's copyrighted works.

Is there another possible conclusion out there? Is there any support of this other conclusion? Is there anyone on this forum?

p.s. Did you give Google permission to make money on your copyrighted photo, Brian?

brian

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment