Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@bsthomsen
Last active April 8, 2016 10:36
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save bsthomsen/8b199fd0dd5b768ee4f5a841bf54073d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save bsthomsen/8b199fd0dd5b768ee4f5a841bf54073d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
// Write a program that prints the numbers from 1 to 100.
// But for multiples of three print "Fizz" instead of the number and for the multiples of five print "Buzz".
// For numbers which are multiples of both three and five print "FizzBuzz".
for (var i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
var output = "";
if (i % 3 == 0) {
output += "Fizz";
}
if (i % 5 == 0) {
output += "Buzz";
}
if(output == "") {
output = i;
}
console.log(output);
}
@schonert
Copy link

schonert commented Apr 8, 2016

for(var i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
 var output = !(i%3) ? 'Fizz' : !(i%5) ? 'Buzz' : i;
 console.log(output);
}

@bsthomsen
Copy link
Author

@schonert ser nice ud men ville nok ikke ha skrevet det så minimalistisk. Nemmere at kode videre på senere samt at lade en minifier optimere det senere. Den bliver nemlig ikke særlig pæn hvis først du sku ha en 3. condition på i%9 el.l.

Og udover det får du aldrig skrevet FizzBuzz(v. 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90) hvor begge conditions er opfyldt.

@danjessen
Copy link

For at være lidt sjov, kan man faktisk lave det til en oneliner ... umuligt at læse, men det virker

for( var i = 1; i <= 100; i++ ) console.log( ( i%3 == 0 && i%5 == 0 ) ? "FizzBuzz" : ( i%3 == 0 ) ? "Fizz" : ( i%5 == 0 ) ? "Buzz" : i );

@sp90
Copy link

sp90 commented Apr 8, 2016

@Vaff
det bare dårlig kode praksis 💃

@sp90
Copy link

sp90 commented Apr 8, 2016

En let læselig udgave

for (var i = 1; i < 101; i++) {
  var buzz = (i % 5 == 0) ? 'Buzz' : i;
  var fizz = (i % 3 == 0) ? 'Fizz' : buzz;
  var fizzBuzz = (i % 3 == 0 && i % 5 == 0) ? 'FizzBuzz' : fizz;

  console.log("fizzBuzz: ", fizzBuzz);
}

@danjessen
Copy link

@sp90 - Jeg sagde heller ikke noget om, at det var best praksis :P

@schonert
Copy link

schonert commented Apr 8, 2016

@bsthomsen rimelig væsentlig del jeg overså med (15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90) - håbløst 😅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment