This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[4/30/14, 11:12:59 AM] Chris Beams: Hey, did you see this? https://twitter.com/david_welch/status/461190856364404737 | |
[4/30/14, 11:13:48 AM] Chris Beams: Not sure if the ability to specify generic types made its way in (in a way that can be used from within a BDRPP) with the changes for generic collection autowiring... | |
[4/30/14, 11:14:23 AM] Juergen Hoeller: hmm, that hasn't been made possible... with any of our bean definition styles | |
[4/30/14, 11:14:41 AM] Chris Beams: yeah, I took a look through the hierarchy and didn't see anything to that effect. | |
[4/30/14, 11:14:49 AM] Juergen Hoeller: we only match against actually declared generic types in the target bean class or the target factory method's return type | |
[4/30/14, 11:15:02 AM] Juergen Hoeller: so in that sense, I suppose it is possible with @Bean methods | |
[4/30/14, 11:15:26 AM] Juergen Hoeller: but only to the extent as it is possible with any kind of factory method | |
[4/30/14, 11:15:29 AM] Chris Beams: yeah. | |
[4/30/14, 11:15:54 AM] Juergen Hoeller: in princi |