cburgdorf

* test
* test
  * second level
  * second level
    * third level
    * third level

cburgdorf

// Exercise 2 - Closures
// Wrap the following code in a closure and export only the "countdown" function.
// Code
(function () {
    var index;

    function log() {
        console.log(index);
    }

cburgdorf

// Exercise 2 - Closures
// Wrap the following code in a closure and export only the "countdown" function.
// Code
(function (container) {
    var index;

    function log() {
        console.log(index);
    }

cburgdorf

//OO Style

var Car = function () {
    var self = {};
    self.maker;
    self.color;

    self.log = function () {
        console.log("Im a " + self.color + " " + self.maker);
    };

cburgdorf

//Consider this as part of a bigger classlike object
.bind('NewButtonClicked.BaseEditWidget.FahrerController', function (event, data) {
    if (isInEditMode()) {
        dialogWidget.question('Änderungen verwerfen?', 'Sie befinden sich im Bearbeitungsmodus. Möchten Sie den Bearbeitungsmodus beenden und ggf. getätigte Änderungen verwerfen?').done(function () {
            //This code is duplicate because I dont want to clutter my class like object with too many 
            //tiny trivial methods. However, wrapping the snippet in a function just inside this handler
            //should be fine or not? (Look at the refactoring at the bottom)
            currentEntity = createNewEntity();
            fahrerEditWidget.loadFahrer(currentEntity);
            fahrerEditWidget.enable();

cburgdorf

// 1. Write a class to support the following code:

// 2. Add a getName() method to all Person objects, that outputs
// the persons name.

var Person = function(name){
    this.name = name;
};

Person.prototype.getName = function(){

cburgdorf

Function.prototype.cache = function () {
    
    if (this.cache === undefined){
        this.cache = {};
    }
    if (this.cache[arguments[0]] !== undefined){
        console.log("using the cache");
        return this.cache[arguments[0]]; //I wonder why this works even for object arguments (e.g. {test: 3})? Implicity converted to string?
    } 
    else{

cburgdorf

//Functional Style in C#

 public void PrintSquares (string message, int n1, int n2)
 {
      Func<int,int> square = x => x * x;
      Action<int> printSquare = (x) => Console.WriteLine(string.Format("{0} {1}: {2}", message, x, square(x)));
      printSquare(n1);
      printSquare(n2);
 }

cburgdorf

//Extension Method to Create a New Tuple based on an existing one and copy over the first Item        
// C#
public static Tuple<T1, T2> WithItem2<T1, T2>(this Tuple<T1, T2> tuple, T2 newItem2)
{
     return Tuple.Create(tuple.Item1, newItem2);
}

//Same Method in F#

cburgdorf

        /// <summary>
        /// Splits up an configuration string and returns an Dictionary<string, string>
        /// (e.g. "CommandName='FilesOnly'; Directory='C:\\Test\\'" becomes 
        /// new Dictionary<string, string>
        /// {
        ///     {"commandname", "filesonly"},
        ///     {"directory", "c:\\test\\"}
        /// })
        /// </summary>
        private Dictionary<string, string> ParseString(string configurationString)