Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@cc32d9
Created April 13, 2022 15:35
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save cc32d9/ac7a4f3b1f9300fc37e08e9521cd8fdc to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save cc32d9/ac7a4f3b1f9300fc37e08e9521cd8fdc to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
EOS Mandel upgrade survey
  1. What's your project/dapp name? (free-form)

  2. Please describe shortly how EOS APIs are used in your project.

  3. Do you host your own EOS nodes?

    • Yes
    • No
  4. What type(s) of API do you require? (multiple choice)

    • Chain API (push transactions, query tables)
    • State History
    • Hyperion
    • Other (specify)
  5. What public API(s) are you currently using? (optional, free-form)

  6. Which nodeos versions are you using in your own infrastructure? (multiple choice)

    • 2.0.x
    • 2.1.x
    • Mandel 3.x.x
  7. What is your current status regarding the upgrade?

    • My application is already connected to an upgraded API.
    • I wasn't aware of the upgrade until now.
    • I'm upgrading my application/infrastructure at the moment.
    • Other: (specify)
  8. Are there any obstacles that prevent you from upgrading the infrastructure? (free-form)

  9. Which new features in EOSIO are most desired in your project? (free-form)

@chillsauce
Copy link

Is there value in including a question about dropped Mac support? Or maybe that's more appropriate for a different audience.

@cc32d9
Copy link
Author

cc32d9 commented Apr 20, 2022

no, Mac is only used by developers. Nobody runs a production server on a Mac :)

@chillsauce
Copy link

Have you enabled subjective billing? @matthewdarwin is this relevant for this survey?

@matthewdarwin
Copy link

Not particularly relevant to ask about Subjective Billing. 2.0.x and 2.1.0 work basically the same. At this point, it seems like 3.1.0 will have some bug fixes to that, but otherwise work the same.

@cc32d9
Copy link
Author

cc32d9 commented Apr 21, 2022

besides, subjective billing makes only sense on public infrastructure providers, and they will be well aware of the upgrade. This questionnaire is targeting application owners, like exchanges, which don't need to enable subjective billing. Or if they do, it shouldn't really bother us.

@Rossco99
Copy link

I think it would be of value to add to this question. "What public API(s) are you currently using? (optional, free-form)"

What type of public API(s) are you currently using -> action/history/query
Which providers are you using for these public API(s)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment