Algo friday 3 solution
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
const startAndEnd = (nums, val) => { | |
if (!Array.isArray(nums) || typeof val !== 'number') throw new Error('Invalid input') | |
const min = Math.min(...nums); | |
let positions = [-1, -1] | |
let countLessThanVal = 0 | |
let countOfVal = 0 | |
let countOfMin = 0 | |
for (let num of nums) { | |
if (num === min) countOfMin++ | |
if (num < val) countLessThanVal++ | |
if (num === val) countOfVal++ | |
} | |
if (!countOfVal) return positions | |
positions[0] = val === min ? 0 : countLessThanVal + countOfMin - 1 | |
positions[1] = positions[0] + countOfVal - 1 | |
return positions | |
} |
Update: Solution has been updated, so previous comments are no longer valid.
Hello @chygoz2, congratulations, you are one of the winners of the $20 award for Week 3 of #AlgorithmFridays.
Your solution was selected because it is most optimal in terms of time complexity. You were able to find a way to solve the problem without sorting the array.
I have written an in-depth blog post here about the solution. The post also announces you as one of the winners for Week 3 of #AlgorithmFridays.
We will contact you in less than 24 hours for your award.
Congratulations once again and thanks for participating!
Thank you.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Well sorting the array results in a O(nlogn) time complexity, which basically supersedes the linear time complexity due to looping through the array. Unless there's a solution that doesn't involve sorting the array, this is the best I think is obtainable.