| 5 |
I appreciate the valuable remarks, including those in the "key elements" of the code. It was also fun and a "nice touch" to see images and emojis in the review which makes it much more enjoyable to read. Thanks! |
| 5 |
Great feedback. |
| 5 |
Precise comments and hints. Great. |
| 5 |
Nice comments and explanation |
| 5 |
Best reviewed I've had yet with over 20 code comments. Thank you so much for taking the time to make this review. |
| 5 |
Thank you! Motivates me to do even better next time |
| 4 |
Additional findings to the first review? |
| 5 |
thanks for the extra information! |
| 5 |
Nice review. You're awesome too. |
| 5 |
The reviewer gave excellent feedback on the code review. |
| 5 |
Very detailed, awesome insights! |
| 4 |
good review. nothing to improve. |
| 5 |
Thanks for the tips |
| 5 |
Thank you for the great review!!! Looking forward to enrolling in more programs on Udacity!! |
| 5 |
I really liked the comments about how the Planning Graph is implemented and what are the problems there. Review of the heuristics_analysis helps a lot. Thank you very much! |
| 5 |
Great feedback! |
| 5 |
thanks for detailed review. I was using 3 convolution layers already, but I added 2 more. |
| 5 |
Thanks for your nice review. Like you pointed out, I realize my explanation was horrible for theta4-6. I will revise that after work ! Sorry for bothering you several times ! |
| 5 |
Excellent feedback, reviewed with attention to the details. |
| 5 |
Fast review, great feedback. |
| 5 |
Thanks for Review! :-) |
| 5 |
Nice pointers towards fixing my code, as well as in my heuristics_analysis conclusion. Thank you. |
| 5 |
Interesting comments that enable to go further in my learning. |
| 5 |
Awesome review. Thanks for the feedback! |
| 5 |
Very thorough comments |
| 4 |
Was generally good, but the scoring and explanation of the level sum heuristic was unclear. |
| 5 |
Great alternative code snippets and approaches. Many thanks! |
| 3 |
I found this review to be in part misleading. The review mentioned that there was an error in the selectorDIC because it seemed to output the maximum number of state for every word but without pointing to any specific code issue. But after looking at the code I believe the SelectorDIC was actually fine, and the problem was related to the selectorCV where there was a bug (meanwhile for the review this part was fine). |
| 5 |
great review |
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
Thanks for reviewing my project. |
| 5 |
Very nice and thorough review. Thanks for the great comments. Your feedback helped to improve BIC and overall WER quite significantly actually. I also appreciated the Soviet Union example ;) |
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
I can't resubmit on windows with udacity submit ... |
| 5 |
Good feedback. Thank you. |
| 5 |
Thanks for all the comments! |
| 4 |
What do you mean by "...You may return a fixed number of states here..." |
| 5 |
I really appreciate the suggestions.. I never expected the code review will be this thorough ..Thanks a lot! |
| 5 |
Thanks for all the comments! I appreciate you going through all of my code :) |
| 5 |
Thank you for being so thorough. It is appreciated. |
| 5 |
Clear and motivating explanation for the correction and very good suggestions for improvement! |
| 4 |
Did not contain comments on the .ipynb file and answers given to questions. |
| 5 |
Awesome! |
| 5 |
great feedback, clearly explained in an orderly manner |
| 5 |
Cheers! |
| 5 |
I like your review. They are in detail and well explained. It makes the communication much easier. |
| 4 |
The review was clear, thank you |
| 5 |
Thank you for review! increased motivation! |
| 5 |
thank you |
| 5 |
The review is very good. |
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
Thank you very much for feedback! |
| 5 |
Thanks for the great response. |
| 5 |
Feedback is clear and it helps me improve considerably. |
| 5 |
THKS QUARK! DUCK IS HAPPY! |
| 5 |
Thanks for the review!! |
| 5 |
Very kind review! |
| 5 |
Thanks, for suggesting the changes to my submission. |
| 5 |
Great encouraging words from reviewer. |
| 5 |
I agree with the reviewer about the two loop solution, instead of three. Thanks a lot. Best. |
| 5 |
Many thanks for the inspiration :) |
| 5 |
Thanks for the review. Prompted me to think of a better implementation for the naked twins. |
| 5 |
Good review with clear comments on things to fix. |
| 5 |
Thank you for taking the time to write these comments. I really appreciate the explanation of the equation. |
| 5 |
Thank you so much! |
| 5 |
Thank you very much for pointing out the bug! |
| 5 |
Really great and informative review. |
| 5 |
Dear reviewer, I appreciate that you thoroughly reviewed my code and provided suggestions. They make sense. Regards, Alexander |
| 5 |
It was nice to have the reviewer look for optimization of the code and not just the barebones working. It really helped improve the source code that I had to submit. |
| 5 |
Very detailed review, thanks. |
| 5 |
Great job! Thanks for the suggestions! |
| 5 |
Nice compliments, but also gave a good list of suggestions to make my correct code better :) |
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
Thanks |
| 5 |
Thx again for the super detailed review! The quality of the reviews is what separates Udacity from the rest. |
| 5 |
Feedback was prompt and very clear. Thank you! Appreciate |
| 5 |
wow, first review (of several nanodregree programs) with actual code review! additionally provided ice suggestions and examples, as well as trougthouth report review and explanation. many thanks!! |
| 5 |
They are really good suggestions! And I also change "data" to "data.training_set" for all training related prob estimations. Thanks! |
| 5 |
:-) |
| 5 |
good |
| 5 |
Thanks for the detailed feedback! |
| 5 |
very good help!!! |
| 5 |
I appreciate that reviewer recognized some of my efforts that were not strictly part of the rubric. Overall a fair and encouraging review |
| 5 |
Constructive and instructive feedback which made sure I had learned everything. |
| 5 |
A nice suggestion regarding my dilemma, and a nice supportive feedback in general. |
| 5 |
thanks a lot! |
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 5 |
|
