-
-
Save cyphunk/6c255fa05dd30e69f438a930faeb53fe to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
softmax function implementation in js
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
// Fork & examples for the one-line version by @vladimir-ivanov: | |
//let softmax = (arr) => (index) => Math.exp(arr[index]) / arr.map(y => Math.exp(y)).reduce((a, b) => a + b); | |
// | |
// Also see comments for improvements | |
function softmax(arr) { | |
return arr.map(function(value,index) { | |
return Math.exp(value) / arr.map( function(y /*value*/){ return Math.exp(y) } ).reduce( function(a,b){ return a+b }) | |
}) | |
} | |
example1=[ 0.9780449271202087, | |
0.01590355671942234, | |
0.0019390975357964635, | |
0.0015482910675927997, | |
0.0012942816829308867, | |
0.0006004497990943491, | |
0.0004827099328394979, | |
0.0001868270628619939 ] | |
softmax1=softmax(example1) | |
example2= [ | |
{ prob: 0.32289665937423706, cat: '25_32' }, | |
{ prob: 0.15404804050922394, cat: '38_43' }, | |
{ prob: 0.03673655539751053, cat: '4_6' }, | |
{ prob: 0.01545996405184269, cat: '48_53' }, | |
{ prob: 0.011709162034094334, cat: '15_20' }, | |
{ prob: 0.008010754361748695, cat: '8_13' }, | |
{ last: true, prob: 0.0054732030257582664, cat: '60+' } ].map(function(v){return v.prob}) | |
softmax2=softmax(example2) | |
example3=[ { prob: 0.125, cat: '25_32' }, | |
{ prob: 0.125, cat: '38_43' }, | |
{ prob: 0.125, cat: '15_20' }, | |
{ prob: 0.125, cat: '8_13' }, | |
{ prob: 0.125, cat: '4_6' }, | |
{ prob: 0.125, cat: '48_53' }, | |
{ prob: 0.125, cat: '60+' }, | |
{ prob: 0.125, cat: '0_2' } ].map(function(v){return v.prob}) | |
softmax3=softmax(example3) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
By any chance, does anyone have an example of the softmax derivative ? Or is able to tell me if this one is correct: