Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

What would you like to do?

And the famous answer is: it depends. Depends on the use case.

Use case #1: Optional parameters

If the parameters are optional, you may use a single parameter (generally named options) to receive and conditionally Object.assign the default values (mostly used in pre-ES6 code, but still has its use).

jQuery uses this approach in lots of functions. Here's an example from Angular's $http.get:

// No params
// Optional params
$http.get('', {
  headers: {
    'Accept': 'text/html'
// we could have a function that has only optional parameters?

Use case #2: Clarity

If the parameters of a function have no clear meaning, it's better to pass a object, mocking the feature of named parameters from some languages. Lea Verou covers this topic beautifully in her JSUX talk (check out slide #55 and after):

// instead of this
ctx.ellipse(100, 100, 50, 75, .785398);
// use this
	cx: 100,
	cy: 100,
	rx: 50,
	ry: 75,
	rotation: .785398

Use case #3: It should really be an object

Let's say you have a function to save an user. You can receive all user information in a single object:

let user = { name: 'Mario', password: 'p34ch' };

I may have missed more use cases, but here are some. Using object literals isn't a sin, but using them wrong may lead to bad code UX - after all, "code is written once and read many times".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment