Literacy | Description / Focus | Typical Artefact |
---|---|---|
Interaction Literacy: Designing Human–AI Dialogues | Structure instructions, roles, examples, and feedback loops to achieve predictable collaboration. Treat interaction as control, not mere instruction. | Collaboration Blueprint documenting roles, turn-taking, evaluation criteria, and revision cycles for a real task. |
Mechanistic Literacy: Reasoning About Model Behaviour | Build intuition for token prediction, attention, context effects, and decoding settings. Link input changes to behavioural outcomes. | Model Behaviour Map showing experiments across prompts/temperatures/length penalties and the observed effects. |
Data Literacy: Curating and Testing Knowledge Grounding | Ground outputs in vetted sources; design retrieval/citation; measure factual reliability and bias. | Grounding Protocol that compares unguided vs. retrieved/cited outputs with a small evaluation. |
**S |
# | Perspective | What It Focuses On | What It Can Explain / Predict | What It Cannot Explain (Limitation) | Typical Blind Spot |
---|
# | Project | Primary Perspective(s) / Literacy Focus | Learning Focus / Capability | Why It’s Future-Proof | Typical Artefact |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Interaction Literacy: Talking to Machines with Purpose | Interaction | Structure prompts as purposeful dialogues: define roles, intentions, and evaluation criteria. Build clarity, reflection, and feedback loops. | Language-based interaction will remain universal across AI systems. | Collaboration Blueprint – evolving conversation workflow for a personal or professional task. |
2 | Mechanistic Curiosity: Understanding Model Behaviour | Mechanistic | Experiment systematically with parameters (temperature, context length, decoding). Build intuition for probabilistic generation. | Core model dynamics persist across architectures. | Behaviour Map – short report visualizing cause–effect relationships between input changes and |