Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@doctorpangloss
Last active December 26, 2016 23:01
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save doctorpangloss/c090f0a724f9c32fcfa6637412eea478 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save doctorpangloss/c090f0a724f9c32fcfa6637412eea478 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
From Visualizing the Metagame https://hearthsim.info/blog/2016/visualizing-the-metagame/
Of 6112 deck pairs, 157 had 2-card (1 replacement) differences.
Of those 157, 7 pairs had statistically significantly different win rates.
Deck #51 (MIDRANGE_SHAMAN):
Harrison Jones (#1) -> Barnes (#1)
Winrate changes 6.090000 percentage points (2808 matches)
Deck #51 (MIDRANGE_SHAMAN):
Acidic Swamp Ooze (#1) -> Barnes (#1)
Winrate changes 10.550000 percentage points (467 matches)
Deck #70 (MIDRANGE_SHAMAN):
Barnes (#1) -> Harrison Jones (#1)
Winrate changes 6.060000 percentage points (1553 matches)
Deck #60 (MIDRANGE_SHAMAN):
Mana Tide Totem (#2) -> Fire Elemental (#2)
Winrate changes 3.410000 percentage points (4088 matches)
Deck #61 (MIDRANGE_SHAMAN):
Bloodlust (#1) -> Fire Elemental (#2)
Winrate changes 3.030000 percentage points (4778 matches)
Deck #54 (MIDRANGE_SHAMAN):
Fire Elemental (#2) -> Barnes (#1)
Winrate changes 6.610000 percentage points (1981 matches)
Deck #60 (MIDRANGE_SHAMAN):
Argent Horserider (#1) -> Fire Elemental (#2)
Winrate changes 6.670000 percentage points (1949 matches)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment