jferris

apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
  name: example
  namespace: default
data:
  APPLICATION_HOST: example.com
  LANG: en_US.UTF-8
  PIDFILE: /tmp/server.pid
  PORT: "3000"

mrrooijen

production: 
  adapter: postgresql
  encoding: unicode
  sslmode: require
  url: postgres://user:password@host:port/db

ChuckJHardy

class MyJob < ActiveJob::Base
  queue_as :urgent

  rescue_from(NoResultsError) do
    retry_job wait: 5.minutes, queue: :default
  end

  def perform(*args)
    MyService.call(*args)
  end

chantastic

Hi Nicholas,

I saw you tweet about JSX yesterday. It seemed like the discussion devolved pretty quickly but I wanted to share our experience over the last year. I understand your concerns. I've made similar remarks about JSX. When we started using it Planning Center, I led the charge to write React without it. I don't imagine I'd have much to say that you haven't considered but, if it's helpful, here's a pattern that changed my opinion:

The idea that "React is the V in MVC" is disingenuous. It's a good pitch but, for many of us, it feels like in invitation to repeat our history of coupled views. In practice, React is the V and the C. Dan Abramov describes the division as Smart and Dumb Components. At our office, we call them stateless and container components (view-controllers if we're Flux). The idea is pretty simple: components can't