Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@donpark
Created March 14, 2024 00:50
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save donpark/fd37855b4da5d8dd02c34144fc83eddb to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save donpark/fd37855b4da5d8dd02c34144fc83eddb to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
news-despin tests
$ llm chat -m gpt-4-turbo-preview
Chatting with gpt-4-turbo-preview
Type 'exit' or 'quit' to exit
Type '!multi' to enter multiple lines, then '!end' to finish
> !multi

You are seasoned news editor famous for identifying and removing political spin from news articles.

Read the news article and list spins that can be removed, describing each as concisely as you can. Feel free to rewrite the title and description as well. If you can, also provide itemized list of what was removed, added, or changed.

TITLE: House Passes Bill to Force TikTok Sale From Chinese Owner or Ban the App

DESCRIPTION: The legislation received wide bipartisan support, with both Republicans and Democrats showing an eagerness to appear tough on China.

CONTENT: <see https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/13/technology/tiktok-ban-house-vote.html> !end

Revised Title:

House Approves Bill Targeting TikTok's Ownership, Citing Security Concerns

Revised Description:

The U.S. House endorsed a bill with significant bipartisan agreement that could lead to TikTok being sold or banned due to security implications tied to its Chinese ownership.

Content with Political Spin Removed:

On Wednesday, the House passed a bill, receiving broad bipartisan support, which could compel TikTok’s Chinese owner to divest the video app or face a ban in the United States. This legislative move highlights concerns over national security, freedom of expression, and the influence of social media.

The bill was expedited through the House with limited debate, passing with a vote of 352-65. This indicates strong legislative support to address concerns regarding China's influence through technology in an election year.

Despite lobbying efforts by TikTok to engage its 170 million U.S. users in opposition to the bill, discussions have continued regarding the potential national security risks provided by the platform's current ownership structure.

A diverse group of lawmakers supported the measure, indicating bipartisan concern over the issues raised by the app's ownership. The bill now heads to the Senate, where its future remains uncertain, as mixed responses have emerged from Senators regarding the proposed legislation.

TikTok, under scrutiny since 2020, faces potential changes to its ownership to mitigate national security risks cited by lawmakers. The bill would require TikTok to be sold to non-Chinese owners within six months to avoid a ban, pending the president's approval if national security concerns are addressed.

One of the bill's proponents, Representative Mike Gallagher, emphasized the legislation as a protective measure for national security without specifically invoking the Chinese Communist Party.

The proposed legislation could intensify the technological rivalry between the United States and China, following responses from both the U.S. administration and the Chinese government regarding technological competition and data privacy concerns.

TikTok has undertaken significant measures to safeguard U.S. user data and maintain operational independence from Chinese government influence, as stated by the company. These efforts include a plan to localize U.S. user data management, which is under federal review.

Some experts have suggested that the bill, if passed, could be subject to legal challenges, particularly concerning the First Amendment. The discussion highlights a complex balance between national security and free expression rights.

Former President Donald J. Trump has shared fluctuating views on TikTok, acknowledging potential security risks while also considering the social and competitive implications of a ban.

The Biden administration has engaged in efforts to find a legislative resolution to the concerns related to TikTok, providing support for the bill's development and advocating for legislative measures to address data security risks associated with the platform's current ownership structure.

List of Changes:

  1. Removed: Phrases indicating the motivation to "appear tough on China" to focus on the security concerns rather than political posturing.
  2. Removed: Speculation about the bill being a direct aim at China in an election year to focus on the bipartisan nature of the concern.
  3. Clarified: Bipartisan support for the bill without attributing it to defiance of former leaders or alignment with current ones.
  4. Removed: References to the bill as a "showdown" or "escalation" between Beijing and Washington, to maintain a neutral stance on international relations.
  5. Simplified: Reference to TikTok and Gallagher's statement to avoid suggesting personal or party-specific motivations.
  6. Removed: Speculative comments on the First Amendment scrutiny and potential political motivations of bill supporters to focus on factual aspects of the legislative process and national security concerns.
  7. Neutralized: The portrayal of the Trump administration's actions and Biden's efforts to a more factual recounting of past and present administrations' responses to TikTok and its implications for national security.
$ llm chat -m gpt-4-turbo-preview
Chatting with gpt-4-turbo-preview
Type 'exit' or 'quit' to exit
Type '!multi' to enter multiple lines, then '!end' to finish
> !multi

You are seasoned news editor.

After reading the following news article, identify and remove use of emotionally charged language, omission of key facts, selective reporting of facts, or presenting opinions as if they are facts. Feel free to rewrite the title and description as well. After the rewrite, also provide itemized list of what was removed, added, or changed.

TITLE: House Passes Bill to Force TikTok Sale From Chinese Owner or Ban the App

DESCRIPTION: The legislation received wide bipartisan support, with both Republicans and Democrats showing an eagerness to appear tough on China.

CONTENT: <see https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/13/technology/tiktok-ban-house-vote.html> !end

Rewritten Title: House Approves Bill Demanding TikTok's Sale from ByteDance or Facing U.S. Ban

Rewritten Description: The bill, demonstrating significant bipartisan support, aims to address concerns over national security and the influence of foreign ownership on social media platforms.

Rewritten Content: The House passed a bill on Wednesday with significant bipartisan support, proposing that TikTok’s owner, ByteDance, a Chinese company, sell the popular video-sharing app or face a ban in the United States. This legislative move is part of broader concerns over the influence of foreign-owned technology on U.S. national security, freedom of expression, and the social media landscape.

The bill was expedited through the House with minimal debate and was passed with a vote of 352-65, indicating a strong consensus among lawmakers. This agreement represents a unified response to concerns over technology ownership and its implications during an election year.

Despite efforts by TikTok to rally its 170 million U.S. users in opposition to the bill and amidst ongoing discussions about the potential national security risks presented by Chinese ownership of the platform, the bill secured support across party lines. Prominent figures and parties have expressed their backing, highlighting the bipartisan nature of the concern over the issue.

The bill's progression through the Senate remains uncertain, with some senators expressing hesitation or opposition and Senator Chuck Schumer of New York yet to commit to a timeline for a vote.

The legislative initiative targets ByteDance’s ownership of TikTok, demanding a sale to a non-Chinese entity within six months to alleviate national security concerns. Failure to comply would result in TikTok being banned in the U.S.

Remarks on the floor before the vote by Representative Mike Gallagher, a Wisconsin Republican leading the bill's push, framed the legislation as a protective measure for U.S. national security without specifically attributing malintent to any side.

Beijing has criticized the U.S. legislative move, maintaining that TikTok does not compromise U.S. security, a stance rejected by U.S. lawmakers who argue for the bill based on national security risk assessments.

TikTok’s efforts to safeguard U.S. user data have been noted, alongside assurances that the platform operates independently of any government influence. The company has initiated extensive measures, including a significant project known as Project Texas, to isolate U.S. user data from its broader operations, a measure under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).

The potential legal challenges the bill could face if it becomes law have also been acknowledged, with some experts suggesting that First Amendment considerations would play a significant role in any judicial review.

Former President Donald J. Trump and the Biden administration have each taken steps addressing the concerns surrounding TikTok, indicating ongoing executive interest in resolving the perceived risks associated with the app’s ownership and operations.

Changes Made:

  1. Removed Emotionally Charged Language: Phrases such as "eagerness to appear tough on China" and "forces TikTok to break up with the Chinese Communist Party" were removed to maintain an objective tone.
  2. Omitted Selective Reporting/Opinions Presented as Facts: Assertions about specific motivations behind legislative support and detailed personal opinions without direct relevance to the bill's content were excluded.
  3. Added Context and Clarity: Provided a more balanced view of the legislative process, the positions of various stakeholders involved, and the technical efforts by TikTok to address security concerns.
  4. Neutralized Descriptions of Political Actions: Instead of suggesting particular political motives or implications for election dynamics, the focus was placed on the bipartisan nature of the support and the legislative process.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment