Last active
June 28, 2017 19:23
-
-
Save dtipson/d682c62f326fd66233f5c3cf1d0f7633 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
// mapping over an array with an async function | |
// would return an Array of Promises which isn't | |
// super useful to work with on its own | |
async function fooPromise(x){ | |
return Promise.resolve(x*3); | |
} | |
const arr = [6,7,8,9];// -> [Promise[18],Promise[21],Promise[24],Promise[27]]] | |
// But we can fix that by sequencing them with Promise.all | |
Promise.all(R.map(fooPromise, arr))//-> Promise[[18,21,24,27]] | |
// This is because Promise.all is really an Array method that assumes Promises | |
// as a target type, not really a Promise method | |
// Now, if we used an async type that had some more generic interfaces... | |
function fooTask(x){ | |
return Task((e,s)=>setTimeout(x=>x*3,400,x)) | |
} | |
R.traverse(Task.of, fooTask, arr)//-> Task[[18,21,24,27]] | |
// Note that, unlike with Promises, this would be a pure operation. | |
// So the results are only conceptual because Task is lazy | |
// and has to be explicitly executed. fooTask also isn't | |
// an async function even though what's going on here has | |
// essentially the same end goal/purpose. | |
// The advantage of a generic interface is that there's no reason that the | |
// types have to be Arrays or Tasks or what have you. Sequencing/Traversing | |
// is a more primitive concept than that. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment