Create a gist now

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Efficient outerHTML polyfill that doesn't use cloneNode(true)
/*
* outerHTML.js
* Cross-browser full HTMLElement.outerHTML implementation.
*
* 2011-11-14
*
* By Eli Grey, http://eligrey.com
* Public Domain.
* NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK.
*/
if (typeof document !== "undefined" && !("outerHTML" in document.createElementNS("http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml", "_"))) {
(function(view) {
"use strict";
var
container = document.createElementNS("http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml", "_")
, elem_proto = (view.HTMLElement || view.Element).prototype
, xml_serializer = new XMLSerializer
, outerHTML_getter = function() {
var
node = this
, html
;
if (document.xmlVersion) {
return xml_serializer.serializeToString(node);
} else {
container.appendChild(node.cloneNode(false));
html = container.innerHTML.replace("><", ">" + node.innerHTML + "<");
container.innerHTML = "";
return html;
}
}
, outerHTML_setter = function(html) {
var
node = this
, parent = node.parentNode
, child
;
if (parent === null) {
DOMException.code = DOMException.NOT_FOUND_ERR;
throw DOMException;
}
container.innerHTML = html;
while ((child = container.firstChild)) {
parent.insertBefore(child, node);
}
parent.removeChild(node);
}
;
if (Object.defineProperty) {
var outerHTML_prop_desc = {
get: outerHTML_getter
, set: outerHTML_setter
, enumerable: true
, configurable: true
};
try {
Object.defineProperty(elem_proto, "outerHTML", outerHTML_prop_desc);
} catch (ex) { // IE 8 doesn't support enumerable:true
if (ex.number === -0x7FF5EC54) {
outerHTML_prop_desc.enumerable = false;
Object.defineProperty(elem_proto, "outerHTML", outerHTML_prop_desc);
}
}
} else if (Object.prototype.__defineGetter__ && Object.prototype.__defineSetter__) {
elem_proto.__defineGetter__("outerHTML", outerHTML_getter);
elem_proto.__defineSetter__("outerHTML", outerHTML_setter);
}
}(self));
}
@mathiasbynens

T-shirt idea: “0x7FF5EC54 is just a fancy way of saying 2146823252.”

@LeaVerou

Wouldn't it be more efficient if you cached container instead of creating a new element every time?

@eligrey
Owner

Not every element is in the same document, as you can see by my use of node.ownerDocument.createElement.

@sashasklar

Have you tested this in a recent version of Firefox? FF 6.0 on OS X seems to be removing the node without replacing it: http://jsfiddle.net/M27UA/

@eligrey
Owner

Fixed. For some reason I had parent.removeChild(child); in there, and I probably should have at least tested the script once I added the setter :P

@sashasklar

Nice, thanks for the quick fix!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment