Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@ford-prefect
Created April 30, 2015 09:20
Show Gist options
  • Save ford-prefect/524aae3058aca2701786 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save ford-prefect/524aae3058aca2701786 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
WB
http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2014ltr.pdf#page=23#b03g17t20w15
The unconventional, but inescapable, conclusion to be drawn from the past fifty years is that it has been far safer to invest in a diversified collection of American businesses than to invest in securities – Treasuries, for example – whose values have been tied to American currency. That was also true in the preceding half-century, a period including the Great Depression and two world wars. Investors should heed this history. To one degree or another it is almost certain to be repeated during the next century
Stock prices will always be far more volatile than cash-equivalent holdings. Over the long term, however, currency-denominated instruments are riskier investments – far riskier investments – than widely-diversified stock portfolios that are bought over time and that are owned in a manner invoking only token fees and commissions. That lesson has not customarily been taught in business schools, where volatility is almost universally used as a proxy for risk. Though this pedagogic assumption makes for easy teaching, it is dead wrong: Volatility is far from synonymous with risk. Popular formulas that equate the two terms lead students, investors and CEOs astray.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment