brainstorming for parameterized MSpecs

gistfile1.cs

    public class Math
    {
        public static int Fac(int x)
        {
            if (x <= 1)
                return 1;
            return Fac(x - 1)*x;
        }
    }

    public class TestCaseList<T> : TestCaseList
    {
        readonly List<T> _data = new List<T>();

        public TestCaseList<T> Add(T item)
        {
            _data.Add(item);
            return this;
        }
    }

    public static class Data
    {
        public static TestCaseList<T> Create<T>(T item)
        {
            return new TestCaseList<T>().Add(item);
        }

        public static TestCaseList<Tuple<T, S>> Create<T, S>(T x, S y)
        {
            return Create(Tuple.Create(x, y));
        }

        public static TestCaseList<Tuple<T, S>> Create<T, S>(this TestCaseList<Tuple<T, S>> list, T x, S y)
        {
            return list.Add(Tuple.Create(x, y));
        }
    }

    public interface TestCaseList
    {
    } 

    public delegate TestCaseList TestData();
    public delegate void Establish<in T>(T x);
    public delegate void Establish<in T, in S>(T x, S y);

    public class when_calculating_fac_of_ITEM1
    {
        static int x;
        static int y;
        static int result;

        TestData data =
            () =>
                Data
                    .Create(1, 1)
                    .Create(2, 2);

        Establish<int, int> context = (a,b) =>
        {
            x = a;
            y = b;
        };

        Because of = () => result = Math.Fac(x);

        It should_equal_ITEM2 = () => result.ShouldEqual(y);
    }

I absolutely don't like the noise added by the generic Establish delegates:

Establish<int, int> context = (a,b) =>
{
x = a;
y = b;
};

Rest of the stuff looks good though. One point to mention about why I thought Data<> was a good idea. I wanted that information to be compile time visible so that it information about what type is contained can be extracted without having to execute the delegate. Would be nice for reporting (I guess ;-)).

Cheers
Björn