Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@freeman42x

freeman42x/answer.md

Created July 27, 2023 12:21
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save freeman42x/f961a275926f11a34792ffb915fcc93a to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save freeman42x/f961a275926f11a34792ffb915fcc93a to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
How does Elm compare to Haskell from a language point of view?
Raw
answer.md

Elm and Haskell are both functional programming languages that feature static typing, but they are designed for different use cases and environments. Here are a few key comparisons:

1. Target Use Case:

  • Haskell is a general-purpose functional programming language used in a wide variety of applications, from web servers to compilers, data analysis, and more.

  • Elm is a functional language specifically designed for frontend web development, and it compiles to JavaScript. It introduces the Elm Architecture, a popular pattern for building user interfaces, which has influenced frameworks in other languages such as Redux in JavaScript.

2. Syntax and Semantics:

  • Both Elm and Haskell have similar syntax as they are both functional languages and share roots in the ML family of languages.

  • They both employ static typing which can prevent certain types of runtime errors and provide self-documenting code.

  • Haskell's type system is more complex and flexible, supporting advanced features like type classes, GADTs, and dependent types. Elm's type system is simpler, but still powerful and adequate for its domain of frontend web development.

3. Purity and Side Effects:

  • Haskell is a purely functional language which means functions have no side effects. It employs monads to handle side-effecting operations, such as I/O or mutable state.

  • Elm is also pure, but it handles side effects differently through a system of commands (Cmd) and subscriptions (Sub). This is integral to the Elm Architecture and the way it handles user interactions and server communication.

4. Error Handling:

  • Elm is known for its user-friendly error messages, which help developers quickly identify and correct issues.

  • Haskell's error messages can be more cryptic, especially for beginners or when using more advanced type-level features.

5. Tooling and Libraries:

  • Haskell has a large set of libraries and tools, due to its long history and broad use case. It also has advanced tools for managing packages and build configurations such as Stack and Cabal.

  • Elm's ecosystem is smaller and more focused on frontend web development. Its package manager enforces semantic versioning and ensures that all packages are free of runtime exceptions.

6. Learning Curve:

  • Haskell has a steeper learning curve due to its complex type system, and the abstract concepts like Monads it introduces.

  • Elm is often considered more beginner-friendly due to its simplified type system, user-friendly error messages, and the more limited scope of frontend web development.

In summary, while Elm and Haskell share a common functional programming heritage, they have different strengths and are used for different purposes. Elm is focused on making frontend web development more robust and easier, while Haskell is a general-purpose language with a more complex type system.

  • ChatGPT 4
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment