Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@gauss256
Created May 5, 2018 23:42
Show Gist options
  • Star 2 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save gauss256/9d45cfc714c5faaa2d2b2e6e7a74b1d4 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save gauss256/9d45cfc714c5faaa2d2b2e6e7a74b1d4 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Script to confirm that STFT can be invertible without the COLA constraint being satisfied
"""Framework to confirm that STFT is invertible even if window is not COLA
For the theory behind this, see: https://gauss256.github.io/blog/cola.html"""
import numpy as np
from scipy import signal
def stft(x, w, nperseg, nhop):
"""Forward STFT"""
X = np.array(
[np.fft.fft(w * x[i:i + nperseg]) for i in range(0, 1 + len(x) - nperseg, nhop)]
)
return X
def istft(X, w, nperseg, nhop):
"""Inverse STFT"""
x = np.zeros(X.shape[0] * nhop)
wsum = np.zeros(X.shape[0] * nhop)
for n, i in enumerate(range(0, 1 + len(x) - nperseg, nhop)):
x[i:i + nperseg] += np.real(np.fft.ifft(X[n])) * w
wsum[i:i + nperseg] += w ** 2.
pos = wsum != 0
x[pos] /= wsum[pos]
return x
def main():
"""Change the parameters and window below to test other scenarios"""
length = 4096
nperseg = 256
nhop = 64
noverlap = nperseg - nhop
w = np.sqrt(signal.hann(nperseg))
pad = nperseg
# The theory assumes that the signal has been zero-padded to infinity,
# so some attention needs to be paid to the boundaries. The following
# is not elegant but it serves the purpose.
x = np.random.randn(length + 2 * pad)
if pad > 0:
x[:pad] = 0
x[-pad:] = 0
X = stft(x, w, nperseg, nhop)
y = istft(X, w, nperseg, nhop)[pad:pad + length]
x_hat = x[pad:pad + length]
print(f"check_COLA: {signal.check_COLA(w, nperseg, noverlap)}")
print(f"allclose : {np.allclose(x_hat, y)}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
@gauss256
Copy link
Author

gauss256 commented May 5, 2018

The window used is square root Hann. It is not COLA, as confirmed by check_COLA. But the STFT that uses it is invertible, as confirmed by allclose.

@mocquin
Copy link

mocquin commented Jun 9, 2023

Was this ever considered in scipy ? The check_COLA function still exists

@mocquin
Copy link

mocquin commented Jun 9, 2023

My bad, after a quick search : scipy/scipy#8791

@mocquin
Copy link

mocquin commented Jun 9, 2023

In the blog post you mention the overlap-add method to reconstruct the original time signal (part3). Could you confirm that it is slightly different than the wikipedia reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overlap%E2%80%93add_method, which mentions it is an efficient way of computing a convolution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment