gistfile1.txt

   **********************************************
   **      THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY      **
   **  YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE  **
   **********************************************

The original message was received at Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:34:35 -0400
from c-98-225-220-10.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [98.225.220.10]

  ----- Transcript of session follows -----
<austin@well-typed.com>... Deferred: 403 4.7.0 TLS handshake failed.
Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours
Will keep trying until message is 5 days old
Reporting-MTA: dns; fox.seas.upenn.edu
Arrival-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:34:35 -0400

Final-Recipient: RFC822; austin@well-typed.com
Action: delayed
Status: 4.7.0
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 403 4.7.0 TLS handshake failed.
Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:39:36 -0400
Will-Retry-Until: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:34:35 -0400

From: Richard Eisenberg <eir@cis.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: Request: Phab Differentials should include road maps
Date: October 17, 2014 12:34:29 PM EDT
To: Austin Seipp <austin@well-typed.com>
Cc: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com>, "ghc-devs@haskell.org Devs" <ghc-devs@haskell.org>



On Oct 17, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Austin Seipp <austin@well-typed.com> wrote:

Here's how I would imagine what it would look like: Below the
'Summary' field, there is the 'Test Plan' field (as in D344). We can
add another field, 'Patch Roadmap', that appears the same way (i.e. a
bulk textedit form) and appears in the same area as well. How does
that sound?


Sounds perfect to me. I was actually thinking of your proposed approach, but didn't want to push for it as it requires more work than social enforcement would.

Thanks,
Richard