gistfile1.txt

Nearly everybody is familiar with the story about how Isaac Newton discovered gravity when an apple fell on his head.  He hypothesized that the apple was pulled to the Earth by Earth’s gravity, when it fell from the tree, which is a reasonable hypothesis.  Literally every educated person born after Newton’s work was published  (Whitman, 1999) everyone has agreed with this hypothesis, including Einstein.  In Newton’s view, the Earth has a very strong pull on objects, and that pulling force is reduced greatly by the “opposite” pull on Earth by all other objects. This this the very small constant G which pulls almost all the force out of the relationship between two masses in Newton’s equation:  F=(Gm_1 m_2)/r^2 .

Unfortunately, Newton got that wrong.  The Earth exerts an incredible outward force which affects the topology of space which I call displacement deformation of space (or just displacement).  The displacement of the mass of the Earth would throw everything off the surface but for the opposite displacement exerting its influence here.  In short, when something falls it is not pulled to the surface of the Earth, but rather it is pushed to the surface by everything else in the Universe, balanced against Earth’s push outward.   

Most importantly, the acceleration of gravity affects the speed of time (related to C, explained later) thus Gravity is influenced by the speed of light.  Newton couldn't include C in his equations, the only constant he created which is involved in universal gravitation is G.  This means C and G cannot possibly be used in the same equation as they are not proportioned correctly.  This ultimately means that general relativity is incorrect because the proportionality constant:  κ = 8πG/c4 reduces G by c^4 and this is not correct.  
The remainder of this paper explains the spacetime topology that supports displacement, the mathematics of gravitation, and many other topics.

Minor typos:

• I'm confused by the citation of Newton's publication as Whitman, 1999, since it should be in the 17th century, shouldn't it? Esp. to have influenced Einstein.
• Extra word "everyone" after the citation (Whitman, 1999) should be removed.
• "This this the very small constant" should be "This is the very small constant" shouldn't it?

I have another comment, and I hope you forgive my frankness. Please take this as constructive.

Science papers usually focus on what they have found, and leave it to the reviewers to notice that this disagrees with established theories like Newton and Relativity. It's unnecessary and even socially frowned up on to call out individual researchers by name (either contemporary or historical) and call them "wrong." The wording of papers that do that, even if they are revolutionary ideas, may be met with automatic resistance.

So I suggest instead focusing on your mathematical model and your methods of testing its results. You may want to compare how your model stacks up against current accepted theories. If you can present an anomaly in the current model and show that your model solves it better, that would be best. It would mean sticking to the testable facts and avoiding sounding like a disparagement of respected theorists.

I'm not suggesting changing any of the science, just changing a bit of the language mentioning Newton and Einstein by name.

It's tough to go against the flow. I have a good friend who is a neurophysiology researcher, and from him I hear about how the science community works (though I have never tried to publish any science myself). Unfortunately, science is as driven by fashion and personality politics as any other field of human endeavor. Even more so when people's livelihood is at stake. It's worth being mindful of who your target audience is, and presenting the content in a palatable manner.

Great job getting your physics ideas written up! I hope to hear about your progress soon.

That is the point. It fixes dark matter, dark energy and dark flow, and mercury. it completely replaces GR and newton. Pointing out the flaws is meant to help people understand why they are broken and what to focus on as it is fixed.