Debugging 01.02.03.04

debug.rb

///// DEBUG 01 ///// --------------------

list = {'yvr' => 'Vancouver', 'yba' => 'Banff', 'yyz' => 'Toronto', 'yxx' => 'Abbotsford', 'ybw' => 'Calgary'}

# Why is it returning nil instead of first element of the list above
p list['yvr']

///// DEBUG 02 ///// -------------------

def average(numbers)
  return nil if numbers.empty?

  sum = 0
  numbers.each do |num|
    sum += num.to_f
  end
  average = sum / numbers.size
  average % 1 == 0 ? average.round : average   

end

## TEST HELPER METHOD
def test_average(array = nil)
  return nil if array == nil
  print "avg of #{array.inspect}:"
  result = average(array)
  p result  
end

## TEST CODE
test_average([4,5,6]) # => 5
test_average([15,5,10]) # => 10

# Should treat string like number
test_average([15,'5',10]) # => 10

# Should show decimal value
test_average([10, 5]) # => 7.5 instead of just 7

# Watch out! Even tests can have bugs!
test_average([9, 5, 7])

# Empty set should return nil, not throw an error
test_average([]) # => nil

# Non-existent set should return nil
test_average() # => nil

# BONUS: Should ignore nils in the set
test_average([9,6,nil,3]) # => 6

///// DEBUG 03 ///// ----------------------

def sum(list)
  sum = 0
  list.each do |ele|
    sum += ele
  end
  sum
end

list1 = [16,21,31,42,55]

# 1. The following should return 165 instead of an error
puts sum(list1)

# 2. How would you refactor it using an enumerable method other than each? Examples of enumerables: map, select, inject, reject, detect.
p list1.inject(0) {|sum, i| sum + i }

p list1.inject(0, :+)

p list1.inject([]) { |acc, item| acc << item if item % 2 == 0; acc }

p list1.inject([]) { |acc, item| acc << item + 1 }

///// DEBUG 04 ///// -------------------

def char_count(list)
  fruit = Hash.new(0)
  list.each do |word|
    word.split('').each { |letter| fruit[letter] += 1 }
  end
  fruit
end

# Why the long face(error)? 
# 1. This should return count of each letter in the list

puts char_count(['apples', 'oranges', 'hipsters', 'are', 'same'])


# 2. What are the improvements you can do to above code?

////////////////////// -------------

END