Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

🧠 via think.py - 2025-01-01 - using default questions
Thinking about (The Death of the Stubborn Developer | by Steve Yegge | Dec, 2024 | Medium)

Model Analysis (seconds) Summary (seconds) Analysis Size (KB) Summary Size (KB)
claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 19.13 16.15 3.3 2.7
gemini-2.0-flash-exp 11.49 42.15 7.5 22.4
gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-1219 12.61 58.87 0.8 28.6
gpt-4o-2024-11-20 11.03 35.21 6.4 7.0
llama-3.3-70b-versatile 6.02 4.37 4.7 4.0
Total 22.8 64.8
Source Content
Exa Search See Complete Analysis

Model Summary by claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022

🧠 via think.py - 2025-01-01 - using default questions
Thinking about (The Death of the Stubborn Developer | by Steve Yegge | Dec, 2024 | Medium)

Analysis Duration: 19.13 seconds Summary Duration: 16.15 seconds

Here's a synthesized analysis of the various model perspectives on "The Death of the Stubborn Developer":

Summary

Core Agreement (All Models)

  • The article discusses a fundamental shift in software development due to Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • Chat-oriented programming (CHOP) is becoming the primary development modality
  • Resistance to CHOP, rather than experience level, is the key factor in developer obsolescence

Notable Differences

  • Only GPT-4 emphasizes the historical context of similar transitions (assembly to high-level languages)
  • Claude-3 uniquely focuses on the economic and productivity metrics (30% minimum productivity boost)
  • Gemini provides more detail on the psychological aspects of developer resistance

Key Themes

The Rise of CHOP

Strong Agreement Across Models:

  • CHOP represents a fundamental shift in how programming is done
  • Benefits include significant productivity gains (30%+ improvement)
  • Learning curve and adoption challenges exist

Career Impact

Strong Agreement:

  • Traditional junior developer career paths are disrupted
  • The issue affects developers at all levels who resist adoption
  • Creates a divide between CHOP adopters and holdouts

Future Outlook

Partial Agreement:

  • CHOP will remain dominant for 3-10 years
  • Autonomous agents unlikely to replace CHOP soon

Disagreement:

  • Llama is more cautious about predicting CHOP's longevity
  • Gemini places more emphasis on potential alternative technologies

Critical Risks and Assumptions

Strong Agreement Across Models:

  • Learning curve and adoption challenges
  • Inconsistent/unreliable AI outputs
  • Resistance from traditional developers

Unique Perspectives:

  • Claude-3: Emphasizes measurement and ROI challenges
  • GPT-4: Highlights potential ethical implications
  • Gemini: Focuses on tool integration issues

Reflection Questions and Context

Common Themes Across Models:

  • How to balance CHOP adoption with existing practices
  • What metrics best capture AI-assisted development value
  • How to adapt training and career development

Historical Context

Strong Agreement:

  • Parallels transition from assembly to high-level languages
  • Part of broader AI impact on knowledge work

Gap Analysis

Areas of Limited Coverage:

  • Specific implementation strategies for CHOP
  • Detailed metrics for measuring success
  • Long-term career planning in a CHOP-centric world

Notable Omissions:

  • Limited discussion of security implications
  • Minimal coverage of regulatory considerations
  • Few concrete examples of successful CHOP adoption

This synthesis suggests broad agreement on the fundamental shift occurring in software development while highlighting different emphases in how models interpret the implications and risks of this change.

Model Summary by gemini-2.0-flash-exp

🧠 via think.py - 2025-01-01 - using default questions
Thinking about (The Death of the Stubborn Developer | by Steve Yegge | Dec, 2024 | Medium)

Analysis Duration: 11.49 seconds Summary Duration: 42.15 seconds

Okay, here's a synthesized summary of the provided analyses, formatted as requested:

Summary

The Rise of Chat-Oriented Programming (CHOP)

  • Core Idea: All models agree that the central theme of the article is the emergence of Chat-Oriented Programming (CHOP) as a dominant method for software development.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "CHOP involves using chat interfaces with LLMs to generate code and accomplish tasks."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Chat-oriented programming (CHOP) is becoming the primary modality for software development"
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "CHOP refers to using LLMs as conversational partners for programming, enabling developers to 'chat' their way through coding tasks."
  • Shift in Development: LLMs are automating many smaller coding tasks, traditionally handled by junior developers, leading to a re-evaluation of developer roles.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "LLMs are now capable of executing many leaf-node tasks (small, self-contained tasks) previously assigned to junior developers."
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has automated many 'leaf node' tasks in project task graphs, such as writing simple code or testing."
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: "The article discusses the impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) on the software development industry, specifically the role of junior developers."
  • CHOP's Impact: CHOP is not just a trend, but a present reality that leads to significant productivity gains (30%+).
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The author claims that adopting CHOP leads to significant productivity gains (30% or more), even when engineers are skeptical."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Enterprise studies show minimum 30% productivity boost with CHOP"
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "Early evidence suggests CHOP can boost productivity by at least 30%, with potential for much greater productivity gains as the technology matures."
  • Adaptability is Key: The willingness to adopt CHOP is more crucial than experience level, with resistance leading to obsolescence.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "It argues that a developer's willingness to adapt to CHOP is more critical than their experience level."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Developers who don't adopt CHOP will be left behind, regardless of seniority level"
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "Some developers, both junior and senior, resist using LLM-based tools, either out of fear or skepticism, creating divided workplaces."
  • Not a Perfect Solution: CHOP is difficult, has a learning curve, and produces inconsistent results, but it is still an essential skill.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The article notes that CHOP is not a perfect solution; it's difficult, has a learning curve, and produces inconsistent results."
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "The lack of standardized teaching resources, metrics, or best practices makes it difficult for companies and individuals to adopt CHOP effectively."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Inconsistent/unreliable AI outputs"

Re-evaluation of Developer Roles

  • The term "junior" is a misnomer as this shift impacts a broad range of developers.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The article argues the term "junior" is a misnomer, as the issue affects a broader range of developers."
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: "The author suggests that the term 'junior' is not the right characterization, as the issue affects a broader category of developers who are getting left behind."

Most Novel Ideas

The "Death" of the Stubborn Developer

  • Adaptability Gap: The article redefines the "death" concept to focus on developers who resist CHOP, not just junior developers.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The article redefines the "death" concept, moving beyond junior developers to focus on those who refuse to adopt chat-based programming."
  • Resistance as Risk: Resistance to CHOP is framed as a path to obsolescence, shifting focus from a skill gap to an adaptability gap.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "This framing is novel because it shifts the focus from a skill gap to an adaptability gap."
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "This resistance is framed as a risk, both for individuals and for companies that fail to embrace new technologies."

Optionality as a Key Metric

  • Expanded Solution Space: "Optionality," the ability to explore multiple solutions quickly using CHOP, is introduced as a key metric.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The concept of 'Optionality' as a key metric for Code AI is introduced."
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "CHOP enables developers to explore multiple approaches or technologies simultaneously... increasing the range of possibilities for problem-solving."
  • Beyond Productivity: This metric redefines the value of Code AI beyond traditional productivity metrics.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "This perspective provides a new way to measure the impact of Code AI beyond traditional productivity metrics."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Increases 'optionality' - ability to explore multiple technical approaches quickly"
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "This expanded 'optionality' could become a critical metric for evaluating the effectiveness of LLM-based tools."

Most Interesting Ideas

The Analogy to Surgery Robots

  • Broader Trend: The analogy to surgery robots affecting junior surgeons highlights how automation disrupts career progression in multiple professions.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The author uses the analogy of surgery robots affecting junior surgeons to illustrate the impact of LLMs on junior developers."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Parallel to surgical robots impacting junior surgeon training"
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "The author compares this issue to similar challenges faced by junior surgeons due to robotic automation, highlighting a broader trend across industries."

The "Middle Ground" Approach

  • Accessibility: A middle ground between pure CHOP and fully autonomous agents is being explored, with the goal of finding an AI modality that is more accessible to all developers.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The article explores a middle-ground approach between pure chat-based programming and fully autonomous agents."
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "A middle ground might emerge, involving semi-autonomous tools that are easier for average developers to adopt than CHOP but still reliant on human guidance."
  • Incremental Adoption: This middle ground approach suggests a more realistic and incremental path for AI adoption in software development.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "This middle ground approach suggests a more realistic and incremental path for AI adoption in software development."

Industry Collaboration on Metrics

  • Standardized Measurement: The industry is beginning to collaborate on creating standard metrics for measuring the impact of CHOP and other AI-driven tools.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "Gene Kim, a notable figure in software development, is collaborating on creating industry-standard metrics for measuring the impact of CHOP and other AI-driven tools."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Need for new metrics to measure AI-assisted development success"

Critical Assumptions and Risks

The Inevitability of CHOP

  • Dominant Modality: The article assumes CHOP is not just the present but the inevitable future of software development for the next few years.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The article assumes that CHOP is not only the present but the inevitable future of software development."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "CHOP likely to remain dominant for 3-10 years"
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "CHOP will remain the dominant mode of programming for at least the next few years"
  • Potential Alternatives: This assumption may not hold if other AI modalities prove more effective or user-friendly.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "This assumption may not hold if other AI modalities prove to be more effective or user-friendly."
  • Overstated Productivity: The claim of a 30%+ productivity boost may be overstated or not uniformly applicable.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The claim of a 30%+ productivity boost from CHOP may be overstated or not uniformly applicable."
  • Long-Term Viability: The long-term viability of CHOP is not guaranteed, and it may be superseded by other technologies.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The long term viability of CHOP is not guaranteed, and it may be superseded by other technologies."

The Dismissal of Autonomous Agents

  • Premature Dismissal: The article dismisses the potential of autonomous agents to replace CHOP in the near term, which may be premature given the rapid evolution of AI.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The article dismisses the potential of general-purpose autonomous agents to replace CHOP in the near term."
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "Some argue CHOP is a temporary phase and will be replaced by autonomous agents... Others, including the author, are skeptical of the near-term viability of these agents"
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Autonomous agents unlikely to fully replace human-directed CHOP soon"
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: "The author discusses the potential for autonomous agents to replace human developers, but believes that this is unlikely in the near term."
  • Risk of Underestimation: The author's skepticism could lead to underestimating the impact of potential breakthroughs in autonomous agent technology.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The author's skepticism could blind him to potential breakthroughs in autonomous agent technology."

Other Risks

  • Learning Curve: There's a risk of alienating less experienced or adaptable developers due to the steep learning curve of CHOP.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "The steep learning curve for CHOP may alienate less experienced or less adaptable developers, creating a skills gap in the industry."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Learning curve and adoption challenges"
  • Reliability Issues: Overreliance on LLMs could lead to issues with "hallucinations" or other reliability problems.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "Overreliance on LLMs could lead to issues with 'hallucinations' (incorrect outputs) or other reliability problems."
  • Adoption Challenges: Companies may struggle to justify the cost of adopting CHOP without clear metrics or ROI data.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "Companies may struggle to justify the cost of adopting CHOP without clear metrics or ROI data, slowing its adoption."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Tool integration and workflow friction"

Reflection Questions

For Developers

  • How can developers effectively learn and adapt to CHOP?
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "How can developers effectively learn and adapt to CHOP?"
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "How can you begin incorporating CHOP into your workflow without disrupting your current productivity?"
  • What specific skills become more important in a CHOP-centric environment?
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "What are the specific skills that become more important in a CHOP-centric development environment?"
  • How can developers balance the benefits of CHOP with its drawbacks and inconsistencies?
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "How can developers balance the benefits of CHOP with its inherent drawbacks and inconsistencies?"
  • How can developers stay relevant if they are not comfortable with CHOP?
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "How can developers stay relevant if they are not comfortable with CHOP?"
  • Are you prepared to invest time in learning the new skills required for CHOP?
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "Are you prepared to invest time in learning the new skills required for CHOP, even if it feels unintuitive or frustrating at first?"
  • What are the ethical implications of using AI to generate code, and how can these be addressed?
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "What are the ethical implications of using AI to generate code, and how can these be addressed?"

For Companies

  • How can companies measure the true impact of Code AI, including CHOP, on their productivity and innovation?
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "How can companies measure the true impact of Code AI, including CHOP, on their productivity and innovation?"
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "What metrics or benchmarks could you use to measure the success of adopting CHOP in your development processes?"
  • How should organizations balance CHOP adoption with existing practices? * claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "How should organizations balance CHOP adoption with existing practices?"
  • What are the best practices for integrating CHOP into existing development workflows?
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "What are the best practices for integrating CHOP into existing development workflows?"
  • How can companies provide training and support for developers to adopt CHOP effectively?
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "How can companies provide training and support for developers to adopt CHOP effectively?"
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "How can your company support employees in transitioning to CHOP, especially those who may be resistant or struggling?"
  • How can companies navigate the potential risks and challenges associated with CHOP?
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "How can companies navigate the potential risks and challenges associated with CHOP, such as inconsistent results and a learning curve?"
  • How can companies ensure equitable access to and benefits from CHOP across different teams and experience levels?
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "How can companies ensure equitable access to and benefits from CHOP across different teams and experience levels?"
  • What metrics best capture the value of AI-assisted development?
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "What metrics best capture the value of AI-assisted development?"

For the Industry

  • What are the ethical implications of automating tasks traditionally handled by junior developers?
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "What are the ethical implications of automating tasks traditionally handled by junior developers, who now face limited opportunities to grow?"
  • Should the industry prioritize developing tools that make CHOP easier, or focus on creating fully autonomous agents?
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "Should the industry prioritize developing tools that make CHOP easier for average users, or focus on creating fully autonomous agents?"
  • What role will code completion vs chat play going forward?
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "What role will code completion vs chat play going forward?"
  • How will development tools evolve to better support CHOP?
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "How will development tools evolve to better support CHOP?"
  • What specialized AI agents might emerge for specific development tasks?
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "What specialized AI agents might emerge for specific development tasks?"

Contextual Background

The Evolution of Software Development

  • Historical Transitions: The article places the current shift within the context of past technological transitions, like the move from assembly to high-level languages.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The article places the current shift in software development within the context of past technological transitions, such as the move from assembly to high-level languages."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Parallels transition from assembly to high-level languages"
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "The transition from assembly language to high-level languages in the 1990s is used as a historical analogy for the current shift to CHOP."
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: "The article notes that programming has evolved over time, from assembly language to high-level languages, and now to CHOP."
  • Continuous Adaptation: The need for continuous adaptation in the software development industry is highlighted.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "This comparison highlights the cyclical nature of technological change and the need for continuous adaptation."
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "Similar disruptions have occurred with the adoption of IDEs, cloud computing, and CI/CD practices, all of which required developers to learn new skills."
  • Learning from the Past: The article suggests learning from historical patterns of technological adoption and disruption.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "It emphasizes the need to learn from historical patterns of technological adoption and disruption."
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The article suggests that developers who resist change are likely to face similar challenges as those who clung to assembly language."

The Rise of Large Language Models

  • LLM Capabilities: The article is rooted in the recent advancements in LLMs and their capabilities in code generation.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The article is deeply rooted in the recent advancements in LLMs and their capabilities in code generation."
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: "The author discusses the growing use of LLMs in software development, including their ability to automate tasks and generate code."
  • Industry Discussion: The article reflects a broader industry discussion surrounding the implications of AI on software development.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The article is a reflection of the broader industry discussion surrounding the implications of AI on software development."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Part of broader industry shift toward AI-assisted development"
  • Rapid Change: The context is one of rapid technological change and the need for developers to adapt to new realities.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The context is one of rapid technological change and the need for developers to adapt to new realities."

Related Topics

Artificial Intelligence in Software Development

  • Beyond Code Generation: The broader use of AI in software development, beyond just code generation, is a relevant topic.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The broader use of AI in software development, beyond just code generation, is a relevant topic."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "LLM development and capabilities"
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "The role of LLMs in automating programming tasks, including their current limitations and potential future capabilities."
  • AI's Future Role: Includes areas like automated testing, debugging, and project management, as well as the debate over autonomous agents.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "This includes areas like automated testing, debugging, and project management."
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The discussion of autonomous agents fits into the wider research and development efforts in AI."
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "The debate over whether autonomous agents will eventually replace human developers entirely."
  • Ethical and Societal Implications: The ethical and societal implications of AI in software development are also important related topics.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The ethical and societal implications of AI in software development are also important related topics."
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "The importance of developing standardized metrics for evaluating the impact of AI tools on productivity and ROI."

The Future of Work

  • Job Market Impact: The impact of AI on the software development job market is a significant theme.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The impact of AI on the software development job market is a significant theme."
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "The impact of automation on the job market for junior developers and other entry-level roles."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Developer productivity measurement"
  • Changing Skills: This includes discussions about job displacement, new job roles, and the changing skill sets required.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "This includes discussions about job displacement, new job roles, and the changing skill sets required."
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: "Strategies for upskilling developers to adapt to CHOP and other AI-driven tools."
  • Broader Automation: The article's analysis can be connected to broader discussions about the automation of labor.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The article's analysis can be connected to broader discussions about the automation of labor."
  • Upskilling and Reskilling: The concepts of upskilling and reskilling are relevant in the context of AI-driven changes.
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: "The concepts of upskilling and reskilling are relevant in the context of AI-driven changes."
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Skills development and training"

Other Related Topics

  • Developer Tools: The evolution of developer tools and IDEs to better support CHOP is a relevant area.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Developer tools and IDE evolution"
  • Development Methodologies: How software development methodologies might need to adapt to the rise of CHOP.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Software development methodologies"
  • Team Structure: How team structures and organization might change in response to AI-assisted development.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Team structure and organization"
  • Technology Adoption: The patterns and processes by which companies adopt new technologies like CHOP.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: "Technology adoption patterns"

Note on Model Agreement/Disagreement:

  • There is strong agreement among all models on the core themes: the rise of CHOP, its impact on software development, and the need for adaptation.
  • All models highlight the importance of "optionality" as a key metric, although the phrasing varies slightly.
  • The models all agree on the major risks related to CHOP, including the learning curve, reliability issues and potential over reliance.
  • The models differ slightly in their emphasis on specific areas. For example, gpt-4o-2024-11-20 provides more detail on the industry collaboration on metrics, and claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 focuses a little more on the future outlook of CHOP and potential technical questions. llama-3.3-70b-versatile is unique in mentioning the potential for autonomous agents to replace human developers, but agrees with the other models on the unlikelihood of this in the near term.
  • All models agree that the article is a continuation of a previous discussion around the "death of the junior developer."
  • All models agree on the historical context of the article, and the comparison with the move from assembly language to high-level languages.

Model Summary by gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-1219

🧠 via think.py - 2025-01-01 - using default questions
Thinking about (The Death of the Stubborn Developer | by Steve Yegge | Dec, 2024 | Medium)

Analysis Duration: 12.61 seconds Summary Duration: 58.87 seconds

Summary

  • The Rise of Chat-Oriented Programming (CHOP): LLMs are shifting software development towards CHOP, where developers use chat interfaces to generate code and automate tasks. This is seen as the current reality, not just a future trend. (All models agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • CHOP involves using chat interfaces with LLMs to generate code and accomplish tasks.
      • It is presented not as a future trend, but as the current reality of software development.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Chat-oriented programming (CHOP) is becoming the primary modality for software development
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • CHOP refers to using LLMs as conversational partners for programming, enabling developers to "chat" their way through coding tasks.
      • CHOP is described as an integral shift in how software development is conducted, potentially replacing traditional hands-on coding entirely.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • Yegge argues that adopting chat-oriented programming (CHOP) is essential for developers to stay relevant, as it allows them to work with LLMs and automate tasks.
      • He believes that CHOP is the future of programming and that it will continue to grow in importance over the next few years.
  • Impact on Developer Roles: LLMs are capable of handling many smaller tasks ("leaf-node tasks"), traditionally done by junior developers, forcing a re-evaluation of developer roles and necessary skills. The term "junior" may be a misnomer as the impact is broader. (All models agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • LLMs are now capable of executing many leaf-node tasks (small, self-contained tasks) previously assigned to junior developers.
      • This change is forcing a re-evaluation of the roles and skill sets needed in software development.
      • The article argues the term "junior" is a misnomer, as the issue affects a broader range of developers.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: No direct equivalent point.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has automated many "leaf node" tasks in project task graphs, such as writing simple code or testing.
      • This has disrupted the traditional skill-building path for junior developers, who historically gained experience by handling these smaller, simpler tasks.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • The article discusses the impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) on the software development industry, specifically the role of junior developers.
      • The author, Steve Yegge, argues that LLMs can execute most leaf tasks and some higher-level interior tasks, leaving humans to handle more difficult planning and coordination nodes.
      • The author suggests that the term "junior" is not the right characterization, as the issue affects a broader category of developers who are getting left behind.
  • Productivity Gains with CHOP: Early evidence suggests significant productivity boosts (30% or more) with CHOP, even with initial skepticism. (Models agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • The author claims that adopting CHOP leads to significant productivity gains (30% or more), even when engineers are skeptical.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Enterprise studies show minimum 30% productivity boost with CHOP
      • Benefits can reach 10-20x in some situations
      • Major companies and customers are confirming these productivity gains
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • Early evidence suggests CHOP can boost productivity by at least 30%, with potential for much greater productivity gains as the technology matures.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.
  • Adaptability is Key: Developers who resist adopting CHOP risk becoming obsolete. Willingness to adapt is more crucial than experience level. (Models agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • The article argues that a developer's willingness to adapt to CHOP is more critical than their experience level.
      • The article's central thesis is that resistance to CHOP is not just a preference but a path to obsolescence.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Developers who don't adopt CHOP will be left behind, regardless of seniority level
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • Some developers, both junior and senior, resist using LLM-based tools, either out of fear or skepticism, creating divided workplaces.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • Yegge argues that adopting chat-oriented programming (CHOP) is essential for developers to stay relevant, as it allows them to work with LLMs and automate tasks.
      • Yegge argues that developers who do not adopt CHOP will be left behind, as the industry continues to evolve and become more reliant on LLMs.
  • CHOP as a New Programming Paradigm: CHOP represents a fundamental shift in how programming is done, moving from direct code writing to managing and directing AI. (Models agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: No direct equivalent point.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Chat-oriented programming (CHOP) is becoming the primary modality for software development
      • This represents a fundamental shift in how programming is done, similar to the transition from assembly to high-level languages
      • CHOP represents a fundamentally new way of programming via conversation
      • Focuses on higher-level planning and coordination rather than writing individual code
      • Changes the nature of programming from writing code to managing/directing AI
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • CHOP refers to using LLMs as conversational partners for programming, enabling developers to "chat" their way through coding tasks.
      • CHOP is described as an integral shift in how software development is conducted, potentially replacing traditional hands-on coding entirely.
      • CHOP is not just an enhancement to existing workflows but a fundamental transformation of how programming is done.
      • Unlike traditional coding, CHOP involves using LLMs to handle most of the text and context manipulation, making it more about managing conversations than writing code.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • The article proposes that programming will increasingly be conducted through chat-based interactions with LLMs.
      • Yegge predicts that CHOP will become the primary modality for programming, with developers using LLMs to generate code and automate tasks.
  • Uncertainty of Autonomous Agents: While some believe autonomous agents will replace CHOP, the near-term viability is debated. A middle ground of semi-autonomous tools might emerge. (Models agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • The article explores a middle-ground approach between pure chat-based programming and fully autonomous agents.
      • It highlights the work of Idan Gazit at GitHub, who is trying to find an AI modality that is more accessible to all developers.
      • This acknowledges the limitations of CHOP and the need for tools that integrate more seamlessly into a developer's workflow.
      • This middle ground approach suggests a more realistic and incremental path for AI adoption in software development.
      • The article dismisses the potential of general-purpose autonomous agents to replace CHOP in the near term.
      • This dismissal may be premature, as the field of AI is rapidly evolving.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Autonomous agents unlikely to fully replace human-directed CHOP soon
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • Some argue CHOP is a temporary phase and will be replaced by autonomous agents capable of managing entire task graphs without human intervention.
      • Others, including the author, are skeptical of the near-term viability of these agents, citing the lack of incremental progress or reliable products in this area.
      • A middle ground might emerge, involving semi-autonomous tools that are easier for average developers to adopt than CHOP but still reliant on human guidance.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • The author discusses the potential for autonomous agents to replace human developers, but believes that this is unlikely in the near term.
      • Yegge argues that autonomous agents will not be able to fully replace human developers, as they lack the ability to understand context and make decisions.
  • Challenges of CHOP: CHOP is not perfect; it has a learning curve, produces inconsistent results, and requires new workflows. Measuring its ROI is also a challenge for companies. (Models agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • The article notes that CHOP is not a perfect solution; it's difficult, has a learning curve, and produces inconsistent results.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Learning curve and adoption challenges
      • Inconsistent/unreliable AI outputs
      • Tool integration and workflow friction
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • CHOP requires developers to learn new workflows, such as managing context and integrating LLM outputs into codebases.
      • The lack of standardized teaching resources, metrics, or best practices makes it difficult for companies and individuals to adopt CHOP effectively.
      • Enterprises are also struggling to measure the return on investment (ROI) of using LLMs and CHOP in software development.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • The author acknowledges that adopting CHOP can be challenging, as it requires developers to learn new skills and adapt to a new way of working.
      • Yegge notes that there are risks associated with relying on LLMs, including the potential for errors and biases in the generated code.

Most Novel Ideas

  • The "Death" of the Stubborn Developer (Adaptability Gap): The focus shifts from the "death of the junior developer" to the obsolescence of developers who resist adopting CHOP. Adaptability to CHOP is presented as the critical factor for survival, regardless of experience. (gemini-2.0-flash-exp, claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022, gpt-4o-2024-11-20 agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • The article redefines the "death" concept, moving beyond junior developers to focus on those who refuse to adopt chat-based programming.
      • It argues that a developer's willingness to adapt to CHOP is more critical than their experience level.
      • The article's central thesis is that resistance to CHOP is not just a preference but a path to obsolescence.
      • This framing is novel because it shifts the focus from a skill gap to an adaptability gap.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: Implied in the core thesis.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • The author compares this issue to similar challenges faced by junior surgeons due to robotic automation, highlighting a broader trend across industries.
      • Some developers, both junior and senior, resist using LLM-based tools, either out of fear or skepticism, creating divided workplaces.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: Focuses more on CHOP as the future rather than the "death" framing.
  • Optionality as a Key Metric: The concept of "Optionality" is introduced as a measure of Code AI's value, representing the ability to explore multiple solutions quickly using CHOP. This broadens the understanding of AI's impact beyond just speed. (gemini-2.0-flash-exp, claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022, gpt-4o-2024-11-20 agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • The concept of "Optionality" as a key metric for Code AI is introduced.
      • Optionality is defined as the ability to explore multiple options and solutions quickly using CHOP.
      • This concept suggests that the value of AI is not just in speed but in broadening the solution space.
      • This perspective provides a new way to measure the impact of Code AI beyond traditional productivity metrics.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Increases "optionality" - ability to explore multiple technical approaches quickly
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • CHOP enables developers to explore multiple approaches or technologies simultaneously (e.g., trying different programming languages), increasing the range of possibilities for problem-solving.
      • This expanded "optionality" could become a critical metric for evaluating the effectiveness of LLM-based tools.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.
  • CHOP as a Paradigm Shift (Novelty): CHOP is not just an incremental improvement but a fundamental change in how programming is done, shifting the focus from writing code to managing conversations with LLMs. (claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022, gpt-4o-2024-11-20 agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: Implied but not explicitly stated as novel.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • CHOP represents a fundamentally new way of programming via conversation
      • Focuses on higher-level planning and coordination rather than writing individual code
      • Changes the nature of programming from writing code to managing/directing AI
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • CHOP is not just an enhancement to existing workflows but a fundamental transformation of how programming is done.
      • Unlike traditional coding, CHOP involves using LLMs to handle most of the text and context manipulation, making it more about managing conversations than writing code.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • The article proposes that programming will increasingly be conducted through chat-based interactions with LLMs.

Most Interesting Ideas

  • Analogy to Surgery Robots: The comparison of LLMs impacting junior developers to surgery robots affecting junior surgeons highlights a broader trend of automation changing career progression across professions. (gemini-2.0-flash-exp, gpt-4o-2024-11-20 agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • The author uses the analogy of surgery robots affecting junior surgeons to illustrate the impact of LLMs on junior developers.
      • This analogy highlights how automation is changing the career progression in multiple professions, not just software.
      • This comparison also makes the concept more accessible to a broader audience by relating it to a more familiar context.
      • It underscores the idea that automation is disrupting traditional hierarchies and training methods.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Parallel to surgical robots impacting junior surgeon training
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • The author compares this issue to similar challenges faced by junior surgeons due to robotic automation, highlighting a broader trend across industries.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.
  • The "Stubborn Developer" Archetype (Interesting framing): Framing developers resistant to CHOP as similar to assembly language holdouts provides a compelling image of potential obsolescence. (gpt-4o-2024-11-20 only)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: Discussed as a novel idea.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: Focuses on the impact, not the archetype.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • Developers resistant to new tools like CHOP are compared to assembly-language holdouts in the 1990s, who were eventually left behind as higher-level languages became dominant.
      • This resistance is framed as a risk, both for individuals and for companies that fail to embrace new technologies.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.
  • Industry Collaboration on Metrics: The effort to create industry-standard metrics for measuring the impact of CHOP, similar to DORA metrics, is an interesting development with the potential to drive adoption and understanding. (gpt-4o-2024-11-20 only)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: No direct equivalent point.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Need for new metrics to measure AI-assisted development success
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • Gene Kim, a notable figure in software development, is collaborating on creating industry-standard metrics for measuring the impact of CHOP and other AI-driven tools.
      • These metrics aim to provide clarity for enterprises investing in AI, potentially mirroring the success of the DORA metrics for CI/CD.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.
  • The Middle Ground Approach: Exploring a balance between pure CHOP and fully autonomous agents, aiming for more accessible AI tools, is an interesting and potentially more realistic path for AI adoption. (gemini-2.0-flash-exp only)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • The article explores a middle-ground approach between pure chat-based programming and fully autonomous agents.
      • It highlights the work of Idan Gazit at GitHub, who is trying to find an AI modality that is more accessible to all developers.
      • This acknowledges the limitations of CHOP and the need for tools that integrate more seamlessly into a developer's workflow.
      • This middle ground approach suggests a more realistic and incremental path for AI adoption in software development.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: Mentions the outlook for autonomous agents but not a middle ground approach.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: Mentions the possibility of a middle ground.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.

Critical Assumptions and Risks

  • The Inevitability of CHOP: The assumption that CHOP is the inevitable future of software development, potentially overlooking other AI modalities or developer preferences. (gemini-2.0-flash-exp, claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022, gpt-4o-2024-11-20 agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • The article assumes that CHOP is not only the present but the inevitable future of software development.
      • This assumption may not hold if other AI modalities prove to be more effective or user-friendly.
      • The article risks alienating developers who may have valid reasons for not fully adopting CHOP.
      • The claim of a 30%+ productivity boost from CHOP may be overstated or not uniformly applicable.
      • The long term viability of CHOP is not guaranteed, and it may be superseded by other technologies.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • CHOP will remain primary development modality for several years
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • CHOP will remain the dominant mode of programming for at least the next few years, despite its flaws and complexity.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • The article assumes that LLMs will continue to improve and become more capable, which may not be the case.
      • Yegge assumes that CHOP will become the primary modality for programming, which may not happen if other technologies emerge.
  • Dismissal of Autonomous Agents (Near-Term): The assumption that autonomous agents won't be a significant factor in the near future, potentially underestimating rapid AI advancements. (gemini-2.0-flash-exp, claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022, gpt-4o-2024-11-20 agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • The article dismisses the potential of general-purpose autonomous agents to replace CHOP in the near term.
      • This dismissal may be premature, as the field of AI is rapidly evolving.
      • The author's skepticism could blind him to potential breakthroughs in autonomous agent technology.
      • There is a risk of missing out on or underestimating the impact of developments in autonomous agents.
      • The article may be over-reliant on the current state of the technology, and might not accurately predict future trends.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Autonomous agents won't mature quickly enough to replace CHOP
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • Autonomous agents capable of managing entire task graphs won't emerge as a viable alternative in the near term.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • The article discusses the potential for autonomous agents to replace human developers, but believes that this is unlikely in the near term.
  • Continued Productivity Gains: The assumption that the reported productivity gains with CHOP will continue or increase. (claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 only)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: Implicit in the overall positive view of CHOP.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Current productivity gains will continue/increase
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: Implicit in the discussion of CHOP's potential.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: Implicit in the view of CHOP as the future.
  • Adoption and Learning Curve Risks: The risk that the steep learning curve of CHOP may hinder adoption and create a skills gap. (claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022, gpt-4o-2024-11-20 agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: Acknowledges the learning curve as a drawback.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Learning curve and adoption challenges
      • Resistance from traditional developers
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • The steep learning curve for CHOP may alienate less experienced or less adaptable developers, creating a skills gap in the industry.
      • Developers and organizations can adapt to CHOP quickly enough to avoid falling behind competitors who adopt it earlier.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • The author acknowledges that adopting CHOP can be challenging, as it requires developers to learn new skills and adapt to a new way of working.
  • Reliability of LLMs: The risk of relying on LLMs, which can produce incorrect or biased outputs ("hallucinations"). (gpt-4o-2024-11-20, llama-3.3-70b-versatile agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: Mentions inconsistent results.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • Inconsistent/unreliable AI outputs
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • Overreliance on LLMs could lead to issues with "hallucinations" (incorrect outputs) or other reliability problems.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • Yegge notes that there are risks associated with relying on LLMs, including the potential for errors and biases in the generated code.
  • Cost Justification: The risk that companies may struggle to justify the cost of adopting CHOP without clear metrics or ROI data. (gpt-4o-2024-11-20 only)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: No direct equivalent point.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: Implied in the need for new metrics.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • Companies may struggle to justify the cost of adopting CHOP without clear metrics or ROI data, slowing its adoption.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.

Reflection Questions

  • For Developers: Adapting to CHOP: How can developers effectively learn and integrate CHOP into their workflows, balance its benefits with its drawbacks, and stay relevant if they are uncomfortable with it? (All models agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • How can developers effectively learn and adapt to CHOP?
      • How can developers balance the benefits of CHOP with its inherent drawbacks and inconsistencies?
      • How can developers stay relevant if they are not comfortable with CHOP?
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: Implied in strategic and technical questions.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • How can you begin incorporating CHOP into your workflow without disrupting your current productivity?
      • Are you prepared to invest time in learning the new skills required for CHOP, even if it feels unintuitive or frustrating at first?
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • How will the role of developers change as LLMs become more integrated into the development process?
  • For Developers: Essential Skills: What specific skills become more important in a CHOP-centric environment? (gemini-2.0-flash-exp only)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • What are the specific skills that become more important in a CHOP-centric development environment?
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: Implied in technical questions about tool evolution.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: Implied in the need to learn new skills for CHOP.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.
  • For Developers: Ethical Implications: What are the ethical considerations of using AI to generate code? (gemini-2.0-flash-exp, gpt-4o-2024-11-20 agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • What are the ethical implications of using AI to generate code, and how can these be addressed?
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: No direct equivalent point.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • What are the ethical implications of automating tasks traditionally handled by junior developers, who now face limited opportunities to grow?
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.
  • For Companies: Measuring Impact: How can companies accurately measure the impact of Code AI and CHOP on productivity and innovation? (gemini-2.0-flash-exp, claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022, gpt-4o-2024-11-20 agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • How can companies measure the true impact of Code AI, including CHOP, on their productivity and innovation?
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • What metrics best capture the value of AI-assisted development?
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • What metrics or benchmarks could you use to measure the success of adopting CHOP in your development processes?
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.
  • For Companies: Integrating CHOP: What are the best practices for integrating CHOP into existing workflows, and how can companies provide effective training and support? (gemini-2.0-flash-exp, gpt-4o-2024-11-20 agree)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • What are the best practices for integrating CHOP into existing development workflows?
      • How can companies provide training and support for developers to adopt CHOP effectively?
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: Implied in strategic questions.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20:
      • How can your company support employees in transitioning to CHOP, especially those who may be resistant or struggling?
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.
  • For Companies: Navigating Risks: How can companies navigate the risks and challenges associated with CHOP, such as inconsistencies and the learning curve? (gemini-2.0-flash-exp only)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • How can companies navigate the potential risks and challenges associated with CHOP, such as inconsistent results and a learning curve?
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: Implied in the discussion of risks.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: No direct equivalent point.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.
  • For Companies: Ensuring Equitable Access: How can companies ensure fair access to and benefits from CHOP across teams and experience levels? (gemini-2.0-flash-exp only)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp:
      • How can companies ensure equitable access to and benefits from CHOP across different teams and experience levels?
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022: No direct equivalent point.
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: No direct equivalent point.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.
  • For the Industry: The Future of Programming Modalities: What roles will code completion and chat play in the future? (claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 only)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: Implicit in the discussion of CHOP.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • What role will code completion vs chat play going forward?
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: Implicit in the discussion of CHOP.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile:
      • What are the potential implications of CHOP becoming the primary modality for programming?
  • For the Industry: Evolution of Development Tools: How will development tools evolve to better support CHOP? (claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 only)
    • gemini-2.0-flash-exp: Implicit in the discussion of CHOP's integration.
    • claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022:
      • How will development tools evolve to better support CHOP?
    • gpt-4o-2024-11-20: No direct equivalent point.
    • llama-3.3-70b-versatile: No direct equivalent point.
  • For the Industry: Emergence of Specialized AI Agents: What specialized AI agents might emerge

Model Summary by gpt-4o-2024-11-20

🧠 via think.py - 2025-01-01 - using default questions
Thinking about (The Death of the Stubborn Developer | by Steve Yegge | Dec, 2024 | Medium)

Analysis Duration: 11.03 seconds Summary Duration: 35.21 seconds

Comprehensive Summary and Insights on "The Death of the Stubborn Developer"

This synthesis consolidates the analyses of multiple models on Steve Yegge's blog post, "The Death of the Stubborn Developer," focusing on the rise of Chat-Oriented Programming (CHOP) and its implications for the software development industry.

Summary

The Shift in Software Development

  • Key Insight (Consensus across models): Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming the software development landscape by automating "leaf-node" tasks, traditionally handled by junior developers.
    • LLMs are now capable of executing small, self-contained tasks, altering the skill-building path for entry-level developers.
    • Developers must now adapt to new workflows centered around collaboration with AI tools like ChatGPT, reflecting a broader transition in how programming is conducted.
    • This parallels historical transitions in software, such as the move from assembly to high-level languages.

Chat-Oriented Programming (CHOP)

  • Key Insight (Consensus): CHOP, the practice of using conversational interfaces with LLMs to generate code, is emerging as the dominant programming paradigm.
    • Developers engage in high-level planning and coordination, directing AI tools rather than writing individual lines of code.
    • CHOP is framed as essential for developers to remain relevant, offering reported productivity gains of 30% or more.
    • However, CHOP introduces challenges: a steep learning curve, inconsistent outputs, and integration friction with existing workflows.

Impact on Developers

  • Key Insight (Consensus): CHOP disrupts traditional career progression and creates divisions among developers.
    • Junior developers face diminished opportunities to develop foundational skills, as LLMs handle simpler tasks.
    • Resistance to adopting CHOP is likened to clinging to outdated technologies, such as assembly language, with the risk of obsolescence.
    • Adaptability, rather than seniority, becomes the critical factor for success in the evolving landscape.

Most Novel Ideas

CHOP as a Paradigm Shift

  • Key Insight (Consensus): CHOP represents not just an enhancement but a fundamental transformation in software development.
    • Programming shifts from writing code to managing AI conversations, emphasizing adaptability over traditional coding skills.

"Optionality" as a New Metric

  • Key Insight (Observed by gemini-2.0): CHOP enables developers to explore multiple approaches quickly, increasing "optionality"—the ability to broaden solution spaces and innovate faster.
    • This reframes AI's value beyond productivity, focusing on expanding creative problem-solving capabilities.

Most Interesting Ideas

The Analogy to Surgery Robots

  • Key Insight (Consensus): The comparison of LLMs to surgery robots highlights how automation disrupts hierarchies and training in various industries.
    • Both technologies bypass entry-level tasks, altering career paths and skill development.

The "Middle Ground" Approach

  • Key Insight (Observed by gemini-2.0): Idan Gazit's work at GitHub explores more accessible AI modalities that balance fully autonomous systems and CHOP.
    • This suggests a more incremental adoption path that could alleviate the steep learning curve associated with CHOP.

Industry Collaboration on Metrics

  • Key Insight (Observed by gpt-4o): Efforts to create standardized metrics, akin to the DORA metrics for CI/CD, could help enterprises measure CHOP's impact and justify investments.

Critical Assumptions and Risks

Assumptions

  • Consensus:
    • CHOP will dominate software development for the foreseeable future, with autonomous agents unlikely to replace it soon.
    • Current productivity gains (30%+) will persist, supporting its adoption.
  • Disagreement: While most models agree on CHOP's inevitability, gemini-2.0 raises the possibility of alternative AI modalities overtaking CHOP.

Risks

  • Consensus:
    • Challenges include CHOP's steep learning curve, inconsistent outputs, and workflow integration issues.
    • Overreliance on LLMs could lead to systemic risks (e.g., hallucinations, biases).
    • Resistance from traditional developers could hinder adoption.
  • Model-Specific Observations:
    • "The dismissal of autonomous agents" (gemini-2.0) may underestimate future AI advancements, potentially leaving CHOP as a transitional phase.
    • Overstated productivity claims could alienate skeptics (gemini-2.0).

Reflection Questions

For Developers

  • How can developers acquire the skills needed for CHOP and manage its drawbacks?
  • What ethical considerations arise from using AI for code generation, and how can they be mitigated?
  • How can junior developers advance when foundational tasks are automated?

For Companies

  • What strategies and metrics can ensure successful CHOP adoption and measure ROI?
  • How can equitable access to AI tools and training be ensured across teams and experience levels?
  • How can organizations address inconsistent AI outputs and maintain quality?

Contextual Background

The Evolution of Software Development

  • Consensus: The rise of CHOP is contextualized as another phase in the cyclical evolution of programming, akin to past shifts (e.g., assembly to high-level languages).
    • Developers historically resistant to change often face obsolescence.

Broader Trends in Automation

  • Consensus: The shift mirrors trends in other fields (e.g., surgery robots), where automation disrupts entry-level roles and training paths, necessitating systemic adaptation.

Related Topics

AI and Software Development

  • Broader applications of AI in software, including testing, debugging, and project management.
  • The debate over whether fully autonomous agents will eventually replace human developers.

Workforce Development

  • The impact of automation on junior roles and strategies for upskilling developers.
  • Ethical implications of automation in traditionally skill-building roles.

Model Consensus and Disagreements

Key Areas of Agreement

  • LLMs are reshaping software development, with CHOP emerging as the dominant paradigm.
  • CHOP disrupts traditional roles, requiring adaptability and new skills.
  • There are significant risks and challenges with CHOP adoption, including inconsistent outputs and a steep learning curve.
  • Historical parallels and broader trends in automation contextualize these changes.

Key Areas of Disagreement

  • Future of Autonomous Agents:
    • While most models dismiss the near-term viability of autonomous agents, gemini-2.0 warns against prematurely discounting their potential.
  • Adoption Metrics:
    • Only gpt-4o highlights industry efforts to create standardized metrics for measuring CHOP's impact.

This synthesized analysis emphasizes the consensus on CHOP's transformative nature while highlighting critical risks, assumptions, and areas of contention. It provides actionable insights for developers, companies, and the industry to navigate this paradigm shift effectively.

Model Summary by llama-3.3-70b-versatile

🧠 via think.py - 2025-01-01 - using default questions
Thinking about (The Death of the Stubborn Developer | by Steve Yegge | Dec, 2024 | Medium)

Analysis Duration: 6.02 seconds Summary Duration: 4.37 seconds

Summary

The provided analyses from different AI models discuss the impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) on the software development industry, particularly on junior developers. The main points include:

  • LLMs are automating many tasks in software development, disrupting the traditional career path for junior developers.
  • Chat-Oriented Programming (CHOP) is emerging as a new modality for software development, allowing developers to work with LLMs to automate tasks.
  • The adoption of CHOP is expected to increase productivity, but it also poses risks, such as job displacement and the need for developers to learn new skills.
  • The industry is debating the role of autonomous agents in software development, with some arguing that they will replace human developers, while others believe that CHOP will remain the primary modality.

Most Novel Ideas

The most novel ideas across the analyses include:

  • The concept of "Optionality": CHOP enables developers to explore multiple approaches and solutions quickly, increasing the range of possibilities for problem-solving.
  • The shift from traditional coding to CHOP: CHOP represents a fundamental transformation of how programming is done, with a focus on higher-level planning and coordination rather than writing individual code.
  • The importance of adaptability: Developers who are willing to adapt to new technologies and workflows, such as CHOP, will be more likely to remain relevant in the industry.

Most Interesting Ideas

The most interesting ideas across the analyses include:

  • The analogy to surgery robots: The impact of LLMs on junior developers is compared to the impact of surgery robots on junior surgeons, highlighting the broader trend of automation in various industries.
  • The middle ground approach: The idea of finding a balance between pure CHOP and fully autonomous agents, with tools that integrate more seamlessly into a developer's workflow.
  • The future of programming: The potential for CHOP to become the primary modality for programming, and the implications of this shift for the industry.

Critical Assumptions and Risks

The critical assumptions and risks across the analyses include:

  • The assumption that CHOP will remain the primary modality: The analyses assume that CHOP will continue to be the dominant approach to software development, which may not hold if other technologies emerge.
  • The risk of job displacement: The adoption of CHOP and autonomous agents poses a risk of job displacement for developers who are not able to adapt to new technologies and workflows.
  • The need for new metrics: The industry needs to develop new metrics to measure the impact of CHOP and autonomous agents on productivity and ROI.

Reflection Questions

The reflection questions across the analyses include:

  • How can developers effectively learn and adapt to CHOP?: What are the specific skills that developers need to learn to remain relevant in a CHOP-centric development environment?
  • What are the implications of CHOP for the industry?: How will the adoption of CHOP change the way software development is done, and what are the potential risks and benefits?

Contextual Background

The contextual background across the analyses includes:

  • The evolution of software development: The industry has undergone significant changes in the past, with the adoption of new technologies and workflows, and the shift to CHOP is the latest development in this trend.
  • The rise of LLMs: The development of LLMs has enabled the automation of many tasks in software development, and has driven the adoption of CHOP.

Related Topics

The related topics across the analyses include:

  • Artificial intelligence in software development: The use of AI in software development, including the adoption of LLMs and autonomous agents.
  • The future of work: The impact of automation on the job market, and the need for developers to learn new skills to remain relevant.
  • Software development methodologies: The shift from traditional coding to CHOP, and the potential for new methodologies to emerge.

🧠 via think.py - 2025-01-01 - using default questions
Thinking about (The Death of the Stubborn Developer | by Steve Yegge | Dec, 2024 | Medium)

-- gemini-2.0-flash-exp | 11.49 seconds --

Summary

The Shift in Software Development

  • The article discusses a significant shift in software development due to the rise of LLMs (Large Language Models).
  • LLMs are now capable of executing many leaf-node tasks (small, self-contained tasks) previously assigned to junior developers.
  • This change is forcing a re-evaluation of the roles and skill sets needed in software development.
  • The article argues the term "junior" is a misnomer, as the issue affects a broader range of developers.
  • The core issue is the adoption of "chat-oriented programming" (CHOP) as the primary development method.

Chat-Oriented Programming (CHOP)

  • CHOP involves using chat interfaces with LLMs to generate code and accomplish tasks.
  • It is presented not as a future trend, but as the current reality of software development.
  • The author claims that adopting CHOP leads to significant productivity gains (30% or more), even when engineers are skeptical.
  • The article notes that CHOP is not a perfect solution; it's difficult, has a learning curve, and produces inconsistent results.
  • Despite its flaws, CHOP is presented as an essential skill for developers to remain relevant.

Most Novel Ideas

The "Death" of the Stubborn Developer

  • The article redefines the "death" concept, moving beyond junior developers to focus on those who refuse to adopt chat-based programming.
  • It argues that a developer's willingness to adapt to CHOP is more critical than their experience level.
  • The article's central thesis is that resistance to CHOP is not just a preference but a path to obsolescence.
  • This framing is novel because it shifts the focus from a skill gap to an adaptability gap.

The Importance of Optionality

  • The concept of "Optionality" as a key metric for Code AI is introduced.
  • Optionality is defined as the ability to explore multiple options and solutions quickly using CHOP.
  • This concept suggests that the value of AI is not just in speed but in broadening the solution space.
  • This perspective provides a new way to measure the impact of Code AI beyond traditional productivity metrics.

Most Interesting Ideas

The Analogy to Surgery Robots

  • The author uses the analogy of surgery robots affecting junior surgeons to illustrate the impact of LLMs on junior developers.
  • This analogy highlights how automation is changing the career progression in multiple professions, not just software.
  • This comparison also makes the concept more accessible to a broader audience by relating it to a more familiar context.
  • It underscores the idea that automation is disrupting traditional hierarchies and training methods.

The "Middle Ground" Approach

  • The article explores a middle-ground approach between pure chat-based programming and fully autonomous agents.
  • It highlights the work of Idan Gazit at GitHub, who is trying to find an AI modality that is more accessible to all developers.
  • This acknowledges the limitations of CHOP and the need for tools that integrate more seamlessly into a developer's workflow.
  • This middle ground approach suggests a more realistic and incremental path for AI adoption in software development.

Critical Assumptions and Risks

The Inevitability of CHOP

  • The article assumes that CHOP is not only the present but the inevitable future of software development.
  • This assumption may not hold if other AI modalities prove to be more effective or user-friendly.
  • The article risks alienating developers who may have valid reasons for not fully adopting CHOP.
  • The claim of a 30%+ productivity boost from CHOP may be overstated or not uniformly applicable.
  • The long term viability of CHOP is not guaranteed, and it may be superseded by other technologies.

The Dismissal of Autonomous Agents

  • The article dismisses the potential of general-purpose autonomous agents to replace CHOP in the near term.
  • This dismissal may be premature, as the field of AI is rapidly evolving.
  • The author's skepticism could blind him to potential breakthroughs in autonomous agent technology.
  • There is a risk of missing out on or underestimating the impact of developments in autonomous agents.
  • The article may be over-reliant on the current state of the technology, and might not accurately predict future trends.

Reflection Questions

For Developers

  • How can developers effectively learn and adapt to CHOP?
  • What are the specific skills that become more important in a CHOP-centric development environment?
  • How can developers balance the benefits of CHOP with its inherent drawbacks and inconsistencies?
  • How can developers stay relevant if they are not comfortable with CHOP?
  • What are the ethical implications of using AI to generate code, and how can these be addressed?

For Companies

  • How can companies measure the true impact of Code AI, including CHOP, on their productivity and innovation?
  • What are the best practices for integrating CHOP into existing development workflows?
  • How can companies provide training and support for developers to adopt CHOP effectively?
  • How can companies navigate the potential risks and challenges associated with CHOP, such as inconsistent results and a learning curve?
  • How can companies ensure equitable access to and benefits from CHOP across different teams and experience levels?

Contextual Background

The Evolution of Software Development

  • The article places the current shift in software development within the context of past technological transitions, such as the move from assembly to high-level languages.
  • This comparison highlights the cyclical nature of technological change and the need for continuous adaptation.
  • The article implicitly acknowledges that the software development industry is in a constant state of flux.
  • It emphasizes the need to learn from historical patterns of technological adoption and disruption.
  • The article suggests that developers who resist change are likely to face similar challenges as those who clung to assembly language.

The Rise of Large Language Models

  • The article is deeply rooted in the recent advancements in LLMs and their capabilities in code generation.
  • It assumes a baseline understanding of LLMs and their potential to automate various tasks.
  • The author's perspective is shaped by his experience at Sourcegraph, a company focused on code intelligence.
  • The article is a reflection of the broader industry discussion surrounding the implications of AI on software development.
  • The context is one of rapid technological change and the need for developers to adapt to new realities.

Related Topics

Artificial Intelligence in Software Development

  • The broader use of AI in software development, beyond just code generation, is a relevant topic.
  • This includes areas like automated testing, debugging, and project management.
  • The discussion of autonomous agents fits into the wider research and development efforts in AI.
  • The article's analysis contributes to a larger conversation about the future of work in tech.
  • The ethical and societal implications of AI in software development are also important related topics.

The Future of Work

  • The impact of AI on the software development job market is a significant theme.
  • This includes discussions about job displacement, new job roles, and the changing skill sets required.
  • The article's analysis can be connected to broader discussions about the automation of labor.
  • The concepts of upskilling and reskilling are relevant in the context of AI-driven changes.
  • The future of work in various sectors is intertwined with the adoption of AI.

-- gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-1219 | 12.61 seconds --

The user wants me to analyze a blog post by Steve Yegge titled "The Death of the Stubborn Developer". I need to extract key information and structure it into predefined sections with specific formatting.

Here's a plan:

  1. Read the article carefully to understand the main arguments and supporting points.
  2. Identify key themes and ideas to form the basis of the groups within each section.
  3. Extract specific points related to each theme.
  4. Structure the information according to the specified format, ensuring each section has 2-5 groups, and each group has 2-10 points.
  5. Pay attention to the specific requirements for each section (e.g., "Most Novel Ideas", "Critical Assumptions and Risks").
  6. Maintain a critical perspective while summarizing and analyzing the content.

-- claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 | 19.13 seconds --

Here's my structured analysis of the article:

Summary

Core Thesis

  • Chat-oriented programming (CHOP) is becoming the primary modality for software development
  • Developers who don't adopt CHOP will be left behind, regardless of seniority level
  • This represents a fundamental shift in how programming is done, similar to the transition from assembly to high-level languages

Key Evidence

  • Enterprise studies show minimum 30% productivity boost with CHOP
  • Benefits can reach 10-20x in some situations
  • Major companies and customers are confirming these productivity gains
  • ChatGPT is currently the most used coding assistant despite only supporting chat

Most Novel Ideas

New Programming Paradigm

  • CHOP represents a fundamentally new way of programming via conversation
  • Focuses on higher-level planning and coordination rather than writing individual code
  • Changes the nature of programming from writing code to managing/directing AI

Productivity Transformation

  • Non-uniform benefits that vary by task and developer
  • Increases "optionality" - ability to explore multiple technical approaches quickly
  • Changes what projects teams are willing to tackle due to reduced implementation costs

Most Interesting Ideas

Industry Impact

  • Breaking traditional junior developer career progression paths
  • Creating divide between CHOP adopters and holdouts
  • Need for new metrics to measure AI-assisted development success
  • Parallel to surgical robots impacting junior surgeon training

Future Outlook

  • CHOP likely to remain dominant for 3-10 years
  • Autonomous agents unlikely to fully replace human-directed CHOP soon
  • Tools and practices will evolve to reduce current friction points

Critical Assumptions and Risks

Key Assumptions

  • CHOP will remain primary development modality for several years
  • Autonomous agents won't mature quickly enough to replace CHOP
  • Current productivity gains will continue/increase

Major Risks

  • Learning curve and adoption challenges
  • Inconsistent/unreliable AI outputs
  • Tool integration and workflow friction
  • Resistance from traditional developers

Reflection Questions

Strategic Questions

  • How should organizations balance CHOP adoption with existing practices?
  • What metrics best capture the value of AI-assisted development?
  • How can junior developers best learn and grow in a CHOP-centric world?

Technical Questions

  • What role will code completion vs chat play going forward?
  • How will development tools evolve to better support CHOP?
  • What specialized AI agents might emerge for specific development tasks?

Contextual Background

Industry Context

  • Follows author's earlier piece on "Death of Junior Developer"
  • Part of broader industry shift toward AI-assisted development
  • Connects to wider discussions about AI impact on knowledge work

Historical Context

  • Parallels transition from assembly to high-level languages
  • Similar to previous major shifts in development practices (web, mobile, cloud)
  • Builds on evolution of developer tools and practices

Related Topics

Technical Areas

  • LLM development and capabilities
  • Developer tools and IDE evolution
  • Software development methodologies

Business Impact

  • Developer productivity measurement
  • Team structure and organization
  • Skills development and training
  • Technology adoption patterns

-- gpt-4o-2024-11-20 | 11.03 seconds --

Summary

The Challenge of Junior Developers in an AI-Driven World

  • The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has automated many "leaf node" tasks in project task graphs, such as writing simple code or testing.
  • This has disrupted the traditional skill-building path for junior developers, who historically gained experience by handling these smaller, simpler tasks.
  • The author compares this issue to similar challenges faced by junior surgeons due to robotic automation, highlighting a broader trend across industries.
  • Some developers, both junior and senior, resist using LLM-based tools, either out of fear or skepticism, creating divided workplaces.

Chat-Oriented Programming (CHOP) as a New Modality

  • CHOP refers to using LLMs as conversational partners for programming, enabling developers to "chat" their way through coding tasks.
  • CHOP is described as an integral shift in how software development is conducted, potentially replacing traditional hands-on coding entirely.
  • Early evidence suggests CHOP can boost productivity by at least 30%, with potential for much greater productivity gains as the technology matures.

Debates on the Future of Programming

  • Some argue CHOP is a temporary phase and will be replaced by autonomous agents capable of managing entire task graphs without human intervention.
  • Others, including the author, are skeptical of the near-term viability of these agents, citing the lack of incremental progress or reliable products in this area.
  • A middle ground might emerge, involving semi-autonomous tools that are easier for average developers to adopt than CHOP but still reliant on human guidance.

The Learning and Adoption Curve for CHOP

  • CHOP requires developers to learn new workflows, such as managing context and integrating LLM outputs into codebases.
  • The lack of standardized teaching resources, metrics, or best practices makes it difficult for companies and individuals to adopt CHOP effectively.
  • Enterprises are also struggling to measure the return on investment (ROI) of using LLMs and CHOP in software development.

Most Novel Ideas

CHOP as a Paradigm Shift

  • CHOP is not just an enhancement to existing workflows but a fundamental transformation of how programming is done.
  • Unlike traditional coding, CHOP involves using LLMs to handle most of the text and context manipulation, making it more about managing conversations than writing code.

Optionality as a Key Metric

  • CHOP enables developers to explore multiple approaches or technologies simultaneously (e.g., trying different programming languages), increasing the range of possibilities for problem-solving.
  • This expanded "optionality" could become a critical metric for evaluating the effectiveness of LLM-based tools.

Most Interesting Ideas

The "Stubborn Developer" Archetype

  • Developers resistant to new tools like CHOP are compared to assembly-language holdouts in the 1990s, who were eventually left behind as higher-level languages became dominant.
  • This resistance is framed as a risk, both for individuals and for companies that fail to embrace new technologies.

Industry Collaboration on Metrics

  • Gene Kim, a notable figure in software development, is collaborating on creating industry-standard metrics for measuring the impact of CHOP and other AI-driven tools.
  • These metrics aim to provide clarity for enterprises investing in AI, potentially mirroring the success of the DORA metrics for CI/CD.

Critical Assumptions and Risks

Assumptions

  • CHOP will remain the dominant mode of programming for at least the next few years, despite its flaws and complexity.
  • Developers and organizations can adapt to CHOP quickly enough to avoid falling behind competitors who adopt it earlier.
  • Autonomous agents capable of managing entire task graphs won't emerge as a viable alternative in the near term.

Risks

  • The steep learning curve for CHOP may alienate less experienced or less adaptable developers, creating a skills gap in the industry.
  • Overreliance on LLMs could lead to issues with "hallucinations" (incorrect outputs) or other reliability problems.
  • Companies may struggle to justify the cost of adopting CHOP without clear metrics or ROI data, slowing its adoption.

Reflection Questions

For Developers:

  • How can you begin incorporating CHOP into your workflow without disrupting your current productivity?
  • Are you prepared to invest time in learning the new skills required for CHOP, even if it feels unintuitive or frustrating at first?

For Organizations:

  • How can your company support employees in transitioning to CHOP, especially those who may be resistant or struggling?
  • What metrics or benchmarks could you use to measure the success of adopting CHOP in your development processes?

For the Industry:

  • What are the ethical implications of automating tasks traditionally handled by junior developers, who now face limited opportunities to grow?
  • Should the industry prioritize developing tools that make CHOP easier for average users, or focus on creating fully autonomous agents?

Contextual Background

Historical Shifts in Programming

  • The transition from assembly language to high-level languages in the 1990s is used as a historical analogy for the current shift to CHOP.
  • Similar disruptions have occurred with the adoption of IDEs, cloud computing, and CI/CD practices, all of which required developers to learn new skills.

Broader Trends in Automation

  • The challenges faced by junior developers mirror those in other fields, like surgery, where robotics and automation have reduced opportunities for hands-on learning.
  • This suggests a need for systemic solutions to ensure skill development in increasingly automated industries.

Related Topics

AI and Software Development

  • The role of LLMs in automating programming tasks, including their current limitations and potential future capabilities.
  • The debate over whether autonomous agents will eventually replace human developers entirely.

Workforce Development

  • Strategies for upskilling developers to adapt to CHOP and other AI-driven tools.
  • The impact of automation on the job market for junior developers and other entry-level roles.

Metrics and Measurement

  • The importance of developing standardized metrics for evaluating the impact of AI tools on productivity and ROI.
  • Lessons from previous industry initiatives, like the DORA metrics for CI/CD, that could inform efforts to measure CHOP's effectiveness.

-- llama-3.3-70b-versatile | 6.02 seconds --

Summary

Introduction to the Article

  • The article discusses the impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) on the software development industry, specifically the role of junior developers.
  • The author, Steve Yegge, argues that LLMs can execute most leaf tasks and some higher-level interior tasks, leaving humans to handle more difficult planning and coordination nodes.
  • Yegge's previous blog post, "The Death of the Junior Developer," sparked controversy, but he believes the problem is not over and is just starting.

Main Points

  • The author suggests that the term "junior" is not the right characterization, as the issue affects a broader category of developers who are getting left behind.
  • Yegge argues that adopting chat-oriented programming (CHOP) is essential for developers to stay relevant, as it allows them to work with LLMs and automate tasks.
  • He believes that CHOP is the future of programming and that it will continue to grow in importance over the next few years.

Most Novel Ideas

The Future of Programming

  • The article proposes that programming will increasingly be conducted through chat-based interactions with LLMs.
  • Yegge predicts that CHOP will become the primary modality for programming, with developers using LLMs to generate code and automate tasks.

The Role of Autonomous Agents

  • The author discusses the potential for autonomous agents to replace human developers, but believes that this is unlikely in the near term.
  • Yegge argues that autonomous agents will not be able to fully replace human developers, as they lack the ability to understand context and make decisions.

Most Interesting Ideas

The Impact of LLMs on Software Development

  • The article highlights the significant impact that LLMs are having on the software development industry, including the automation of tasks and the changing role of developers.
  • Yegge believes that LLMs will continue to improve and become more integrated into the development process, leading to increased productivity and efficiency.

The Need for Chat-Oriented Programming

  • The author emphasizes the importance of adopting CHOP, as it allows developers to work effectively with LLMs and automate tasks.
  • Yegge argues that developers who do not adopt CHOP will be left behind, as the industry continues to evolve and become more reliant on LLMs.

Critical Assumptions and Risks

Assumptions about LLMs

  • The article assumes that LLMs will continue to improve and become more capable, which may not be the case.
  • Yegge assumes that CHOP will become the primary modality for programming, which may not happen if other technologies emerge.

Risks of Adopting CHOP

  • The author acknowledges that adopting CHOP can be challenging, as it requires developers to learn new skills and adapt to a new way of working.
  • Yegge notes that there are risks associated with relying on LLMs, including the potential for errors and biases in the generated code.

Reflection Questions

The Future of Programming

  • What are the potential implications of CHOP becoming the primary modality for programming?
  • How will the role of developers change as LLMs become more integrated into the development process?

The Impact of LLMs on the Industry

  • What are the potential risks and benefits of adopting LLMs in software development?
  • How will the industry need to adapt to the changing role of developers and the increasing use of LLMs?

Contextual Background

The Evolution of Programming

  • The article notes that programming has evolved over time, from assembly language to high-level languages, and now to CHOP.
  • Yegge believes that CHOP is the next significant evolution in programming, and that it will have a major impact on the industry.

The Role of LLMs in Software Development

  • The author discusses the growing use of LLMs in software development, including their ability to automate tasks and generate code.
  • Yegge notes that LLMs are becoming increasingly important in the development process, and that developers need to adapt to this change.

Related Topics

The Impact of AI on the Workforce

  • The article touches on the broader implications of AI on the workforce, including the potential for job displacement and the need for workers to adapt to new technologies.
  • Yegge notes that the adoption of CHOP will require developers to learn new skills and adapt to a new way of working.

The Future of Software Development

  • The author discusses the potential future of software development, including the increasing use of LLMs and the potential for autonomous agents to replace human developers.
  • Yegge believes that the industry will continue to evolve and become more reliant on LLMs, leading to increased productivity and efficiency.

-- Related Content (via Exa) --

  • Who Killed The Junior Developer? - melissa mcewen - Medium
    • The author discusses the difficulty junior developers face finding jobs, despite a supposed shortage of developers overall. Companies claim they can't afford the mentorship costs associated with junior hires, citing high senior developer rates ($190-$300/hour). The author questions this rationale, suggesting that senior developers aren't fully utilized at that rate and that the companies' concerns may be exaggerated.

      • A lot of the attendees were new developers, graduates from code schools or computer science programs. Almost everyone told me they were having trouble getting their first job. I was lucky. My first “real” job out of college was “Junior Application developer” at Columbia University in 2010. These days it’s a rare day to find even a job posting for a junior developer position.
      • I was lucky. My first “real” job out of college was “Junior Application developer” at Columbia University in 2010. These days it’s a rare day to find even a job posting for a junior developer position. People who advertise these positions say they are inundated with resumes. But on the senior level companies complain they can’t find good developers.
  • Who Killed the Junior Developer? Five Unusual Suspects. — Brian’s Notes
    • This article humorously explores why junior developers struggle to find jobs, blaming not recruiters, but systemic issues. The author identifies two main "suspects": 1) The pressure on engineering managers to maximize productivity, measured by metrics like deployment frequency and mean time to recover. This incentivizes hiring experienced developers over less productive, though potentially trainable, junior developers, especially given the high turnover rate among juniors. 2) The complexity of the modern JavaScript ecosystem, where junior developers may demonstrate proficiency in using various frameworks without possessing fundamental programming skills, leading hiring managers to prioritize experienced candidates who can reliably write code. The author concludes that while neither suspect is solely responsible, both contribute to the difficulty junior developers face entering the field.

      • Suspect #1: The Pursuit of Productivity Our first suspect isn’t a person or organization. No, we first need to investigate an emerging system of incentives built around engineering productivity. Engineering managers constantly feel pushed to increase the throughput of their team. That’s always been the case. But in the last few years, the picture of high performing software teams has clarified thanks to books like Accelerate and The DevOps Handbook.
      • No, we first need to investigate an emerging system of incentives built around engineering productivity. Engineering managers constantly feel pushed to increase the throughput of their team. That’s always been the case. But in the last few years, the picture of high performing software teams has clarified thanks to books like Accelerate and The DevOps Handbook. We now know the four key metrics of successful software teams: Deployment frequency Lead time Mean time to recover (MTTR) Change failure rate (CFR) When judged and incentivized by these performance metrics, engineering and hiring managers face a dilemma – do I hire a junior developer and accept decreased short-term productivity or do I require more experience in the hopes of maintaining productivity?
  • Who will steal Android from Google? - Steve Yegge - Medium
    • This Medium post by Steve Yegge discusses the declining popularity of web development and the rising demand for mobile developers, particularly Android developers. Yegge argues that Android's development stack is cumbersome, contributing to the difficulty in finding qualified developers. He reflects on the unexpected popularity of his previous post about leaving Google and uses the current mobile development landscape to illustrate his point about the web's decline, comparing it to Facebook's near-death experience when it transitioned to a mobile-first company. The post speculates on the future of Android, implying that its complexity is a vulnerability, but doesn't offer a concrete prediction of who might "steal" Android from Google.

      • Who will steal Android from Google? Disclaimers: These are my own personal opinions. A lot of them are probably wrong. I do not speak for my employer (Grab!). Take all this with a healthy grain of salt.
      • Facebook’s Android app has become so large (there have been hundreds and hundreds of engineers working on it for years) that it has sprouted a bona-fide platform, and now you can serve your own ads directly into the Facebook app. For instance the New York Times can buy ad placements there, and all the money goes directly from NYT to Facebook without a dime going to Google. You can imagine how that makes them feel. WeChat is doing exactly the same thing in China. The WeChat app has become a thriving platform for building and deploying other apps (and ads).
  • What is the Difference Between a Junior and a Senior Developer?
    • This article discusses the differences between junior, mid-level, senior, and principal/architect developers. Key distinctions include experience (0-3 years for junior, 3+ for senior, 5+ for principal/architect), skill level (from basic knowledge to mastery), responsibilities (junior developers contribute to teams, while senior and principal engineers lead projects and architecture), and salary (ranging from $59k-$100k for junior to $138k-$230k for principal/architect). The article emphasizes that while junior roles are important, developers can progress quickly with dedication and effort. It also highlights the value of balanced teams with a mix of experience levels for knowledge sharing and cost-effectiveness.

      • Deliberate Practice In “Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise,” we learn that deliberate practice is the key to learning. Typically, you might learn to code by taking some classes, joining a bootcamp, or teaching yourself from books, online videos, blog posts, or Q&A sites. At first, it’s a struggle just to remember syntax and built-in functions, but you keep at it, and pretty soon, you automatically reach for a working solution to the immediate problem at hand. It becomes muscle memory. You manage to get hired, and at first, the job is a challenge.
      • What Should You Study? Getting a great job starts with a great resume. Contrary to common belief, you don’t need a lot of great experience to write a great resume. If you’re junior, you can highlight that as a benefit and point out the learning materials you’ve devoured to ramp up. If you’ve got a demo app you built to showcase your skills, that can help you prove that you have what it takes to contribute, whether or not you’ve ever held a job before.
  • The Differences Between a Junior, Mid-Level, and Senior Developer
    • This article discusses the key differences between junior, mid-level, and senior developers, focusing less on years of experience and more on skill and mindset. Junior developers prioritize making the code work, often writing complex and inefficient code to showcase their abilities. Mid-level developers fall between junior and senior, having likely completed at least one full development cycle. Senior developers, in contrast, emphasize simplicity, readability, and maintainability, writing straightforward code that prioritizes the needs of future developers. The core difference lies in understanding that coding is about communication with humans, not just computers. Senior developers possess greater knowledge of design patterns, architecture, and best practices, but this knowledge alone doesn't define seniority; it's the approach to coding and prioritizing maintainability that truly sets them apart.

      • And what about the senior developer? When looking at the code of a senior developer, you might think: is this all there is? Where’s the rest of the code? A senior developer writes simple, straightforward, and maybe even dumb code. This is one of the biggest qualities that a developer can have when it comes to programming.
      • A senior developer follows the KISS principle: Keep it simple, stupid. A senior developer thinks about their code in a different way than the junior developer. Code written by a senior developer will be made with maintainability and scalability in mind. This is a totally different mindset than the junior developer has—the senior is thinking about the people who have to work with the code, while the junior is just thinking about making it work for the computer. More Than Just Coding Skills Besides coding skills, there are some other factors that can tell you who’s what type of developer.
  • What Truly Makes a Senior Developer
    • This article discusses the qualities that distinguish senior software developers from junior and mid-level developers. It emphasizes that longevity alone doesn't equate to seniority, highlighting the importance of specific skills and approaches to problem-solving, though these are not explicitly detailed in the provided text excerpt. The author acknowledges the difficulty of comparing talent across companies of different sizes.

      • It’s difficult to compare talent from different-sized companies, but certain things are key Photo: alvarez/E+/Getty Images In the world of software, just because someone has been a developer for a long time, it doesn’t mean they have become excellent at it. In my experience, what differentiates senior developers and engineers from junior and mid-level ones is how they use…
  • Junior vs Senior Developers, and Why They Both Matter
    • This article compares senior and junior developers, dispelling common myths. It clarifies that seniority isn't solely about experience but skill and problem-solving ability. Senior developers can independently build applications, demonstrating initiative and resourcefulness in learning new technologies. They know how to find solutions, even if it involves seeking help from others. Conversely, junior developers possess less experience but are still valuable team members. The article advocates for employing both levels of developers to create a well-rounded team.

      • Junior Developers As a junior developer, you’re new to the world of coding — but you do need a base foundation of skills. Someone who just decided that they want to start coding isn’t automatically a junior developer. You need to understand the fundamentals such as variables, loops, functions, conditionals, data types, etc. — and how to actually use them to accomplish tasks. A junior developer should be given small to medium-sized programming tasks from their superiors with the expectation of accomplishing them, assuming that they are provided the necessary resources (i.e.
      • Any developer looking for a job is bound to come across postings for a “senior developer” or “junior/entry-level developer” — perhaps without really understanding the difference between the two. At the same time, many hiring managers seeking a developer may not understand the difference either, and may by default assume they always need a senior developer to help solve their problems. Today we’re going to address this question, and analyze why the best choice a company can make is to employ both junior and senior level developers alike. The core difference between senior and junior developers is that senior developers are in general more skilled in their field than junior developers. You probably knew that, right?
  • Get that job at Grab - Steve Yegge - Medium
    • This Medium post by Steve Yegge reflects on his decade-old blog post advising on getting a job at Google. While initially met with criticism, the advice remains relevant, emphasizing fundamental computer science concepts as key to success. Yegge argues that even those in seemingly comfortable, high-paying jobs should consider seeking new opportunities, challenging the complacency often felt at major tech companies like Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Microsoft. He encourages readers to prioritize career growth and avoid settling for unhappiness, even if it means leaving a familiar and comfortable position.

      • Because something very strange is going on in the industry. It started maybe a couple years ago, and escalated a lot around a year ago, and then went completely crazy about six months ago. What happened is this: Global demand for software engineers has completely outstripped supply. There has always been a strong demand, and being a software engineer is always a great way to have a great job for life. But recently the demand has gone straight to crazy-town.
      • Don’t technologies change? They do! I think the main reason is that I focused on timeless concepts that could be thought of as the ABCs of computer science. Nothing complicated; it’s all stuff that’s been around for 40 years or more, and can all be learned in well under a year. These concepts are some of the key building blocks for good engineers.
  • We’re Gonna Need a Bigger Moat - Steve Yegge - Medium
    • This Medium post by Steve Yegge discusses the rapid advancement of LLMs and its implications. He highlights Geoffrey Hinton's recent warnings about the technology and the revelation in Luke Sernau's essay that Google lacks a competitive advantage due to the rapid progress of open-source LLMs like LLaMA. Yegge emphasizes the shocking speed of LLM development, illustrated by a chart showing progress in weeks, not months, and suggests this poses a significant threat to established players like Google and OpenAI. The post frames this as a potential "tech zombie apocalypse" and explores what this means for programmers and the broader implications of this technology.

      • Read on. I’ll lay it all out for you in this post. You are a smart person, and your guess is as good as anyone’s at this point. But if you feel like you’re a little behind on AI developments lately, and you need a good introductory resource to catch up on where we’re headed, I recommend watching this short but informative overview . For today’s post, we’re going to focus on what all this means for you, a programmer, and what it means for me, a regular guy in a mountain bunker stocking up on ammo and water.
      • Seriously? Because I don’t think Sundar has been referring to Amazon’s Fire Stick here. Let’s think step by step Before last week’s news, we already knew that Google’s Transformer architecture, which is the basis for all LLMs, is truly an invention for the ages. It’s a simple mathematical tool, much like the Fourier transform, except instead of picking out frequencies from noise, it picks out meaning from language. Google Transformer architecture As an invention, despite its apparent simplicity, the Transformer has many other remarkable properties: It can learn and remember representations of things It is highly parallelizable, and learns fast It is scalable and can learn essentially unlimited amounts of information It can be instructed to perform tasks It can generate predictions based on its knowledge And its predictions are so good that asking the right questions becomes an art in its own right In short, it’s hats-off one of the best math tricks of all time, right up there with physics itself in terms of its ability and potential to change the world.
  • Stevey's Blog Rants: Good Agile, Bad Agile
    • This blog post contrasts "good" and "bad" Agile software development. The author initially viewed Agile as a fad, but now distinguishes between effective and ineffective implementations. "Bad" Agile is characterized by companies following outdated, brutal methods—throwing resources at projects with unrealistic deadlines and little regard for developers. "Good" Agile (details of which are promised but not fully explained in this excerpt) is presented as a superior alternative, implicitly contrasting with the described exploitative practices. The author humorously uses the analogy of "good" and "bad" cholesterol and threatens self-castration to anyone who ever sees him become a paid Agile consultant.

      • " Most of us in our industry are date-driven. There's always a next milestone, always a deadline, always some date-driven goal to it. The only exceptions I can think of to this rule are: 1) Open-source software projects. 2) Grad school projects. 3) Google.
      • Traditional software development can safely be called Date-Oriented Programming, almost without exception. Startup companies have a clock set by their investors and their budget. Big clients set target dates for their consultants. Sales people and product managers set target dates based on their evaluation of market conditions. Engineers set dates based on estimates of previous work that seems similar.
  • Software engineers will be obsolete by 2060
    • The article draws a parallel between software engineers today and telegraph operators of the 19th century. Both were/are highly skilled, well-paid professions experiencing booming demand due to the rise of their respective technologies (telegrams and software). However, just as the telephone rendered telegraph operators largely obsolete, the article predicts that advancements in software development tools and AI will significantly reduce the need for human software engineers by 2060. While current software development requires human input, the author argues that this will change as automation improves, leading to a potential decline in the profession's demand.

      • Thomas Edison was a telegraph operator early in his career before settling into his true calling of stealing ideas from Nikola Tesla and empire-building. And unsurprisingly, as with contemporary software engineering, there were huge pay discrepancies between men and women. Yet by the 20th century, the telephone had been invented, a technology that had the distinct advantage of not requiring an operator tasked with translation from code to natural language. By the 1920s, there were only a small fraction of the telegraph operators left compared to the 1890s. The Downfall of Software Engineering Fast forward a hundred years, and we seem to be in a similar situation with software engineers.
      • The current version of the profession is under pressure along two fronts. First, there are website-building tools like Weebly that allow anyone to build a website without writing software. Moreover, basic high level software engineering is getting more and more accessible, so that the delta between expressing clear ideas and being able to program is vanishing. Second, on another front, software is getting better at facilitating the creation of software. While we are still a ways away from a fully automated piece of software that can write other pieces of software given some minimal, half-baked specification (i.e.
  • Dear Graduates, You’re Not “Junior Developers”
    • This article discusses the debate surrounding the "junior developer" title. The author argues against it, suggesting "apprentice developer" as a more appropriate term. This is because the term "junior" implies a hierarchy based on age and gender, while "apprentice" focuses on the level of supervision needed, regardless of skill or experience. The author also points out that the ability to pursue side projects, often suggested as a path to avoid being a "junior developer," is a privilege not afforded to everyone due to economic factors. The article concludes that focusing on the need for supervision rather than skill level provides a more accurate and inclusive representation of early-career developers.

      • Why you shouldn’t think of yourself as a junior developer A lot of young people will graduate this month and start looking for a job. They’re polishing their LinkedIn profiles, deleting those beer-bash photos from their social media accounts, and deciding on a career path they think will bring success. In a way, entering the workforce is a bit like attending a Halloween party: “What should I go as?” If you’re entering the tech workforce, you might be wondering if you should go as a “junior developer.” Well, there is a lively debate online right now about this very topic. One side says emphatically no, you should not. “Seriously, don’t be a junior developer.” This side says, you should learn to code on your own.
      • In a way, entering the workforce is a bit like attending a Halloween party: “What should I go as?” If you’re entering the tech workforce, you might be wondering if you should go as a “junior developer.” Well, there is a lively debate online right now about this very topic. One side says emphatically no, you should not. “Seriously, don’t be a junior developer.” This side says, you should learn to code on your own. Do some side projects and don’t enter the workforce until you’re at least an intermediate coder or a solid plain coder with nothing junior about you. The other side says yes, go ahead, be a junior developer.
  • The Erosion of the Status of Software Developers as Professionals
    • This article discusses the decline in the professional status of software developers over the past 20 years. The author argues that the rise of armchair experts during the dot-com boom and a lack of respect for developers' expertise outside the software development community have contributed to this erosion. Many individuals have risen to management positions without significant technical expertise, while "non-technical tech entrepreneurs" often rely on developers without fully understanding the complexities of software development. The author laments the lack of consideration given to developers' opinions in public discourse, exemplified by the "Year of Code" debate, where non-developers dominated the conversation.

      • And it’s self-evident that, once you step outside of the bubble of the software development community, nobody else cares what you think about software development or things related to it. The Year Of Code debate has largely played out in the mainstream media without taking into account what software developers think. For the most part, everyone who’s been asked to comment is not a software developer. Indeed, some journalists have actively denigrated the opinions of experienced software developers, dismissing them as “code snobbery”. Why should anyone believe us when we say it’s more complicated than that, or that learning to program is hard?
      • Old war wound… Photo by Ahmed M Elpahwee on Unsplash In my 20 years writing software for a living, and teaching others to write software, I’ve witnessed a slow erosion of the stature and esteem in which people who write software are held. In the early 1990s, it was widely understood that this was a highly specialized and complex technical discipline (and this is back when it was much simpler than it is today). It takes years to gain enough practical mastery of the whole business — not just programming — of creating useful, valuable software. As computing entered the mainstream during the 1990s (by 1999, most homes had at least one computer, and using a computer had become pretty much the norm in many lines of work), enter stage right a growing army of armchair experts. This accelerated rapidly during the dotcom boom of the late 90s, as pretty much anyone who could claim to program at all was drafted in to help float a million and one really stupid business start-up ideas.
  • Software engineers hate code.
    • Software engineers, the article argues, secretly hate code, especially that written by others. This explains their preference for new projects and the popularity of microservices—a way to avoid dealing with existing code. They prefer seeking solutions on Stack Overflow rather than examining code directly. However, engineers love writing code, often to the exclusion of other tasks. Tools that automate code generation are highly valued. Senior engineers, a rare breed, temper this passion, recognizing that excessive code leads to increased maintenance and downtime; they prioritize deleting unnecessary code to minimize future problems.

      • Notable engineers online invest hours of time writing about their code, or about how they write code. Paradoxically, engineers love reading this stuff, even if they never read the example code attached! Meetings of all kinds, technical and user documentation, testing, post-release monitoring, refactoring - all are common sources of frustration that cut into valuable time that could otherwise be spent writing code! Engineers will spend enormous effort learning or building tools to help them write more code. In the past couple of years, we've seen an entirely new generation of tooling emerge that can actually write code by itself, turning 10x engineers into 1,000x engineers*!
      • " Senior engineers have learned through hard-won experience that writing code is the ultimate diminishing return. They know that code becomes legacy the moment the first byte is saved to disk. The rolling green fields of their youth are a happy delusion, distracting from the cold, hard truth that all code demands maintenance. They have felt the pain of an unmaintained system breaking at the worst possible time. There are a limited number of hours in the day.
  • Dear Google Cloud: Your Deprecation Policy is Killing You
    • This blog post recounts the author's experience receiving an email from Google's Bigtable team about an outdated binary. The author initially dismissed it as a generic form email but later realized it was a personalized notification. The post then segues into a broader discussion about Google's internal infrastructure, specifically Bigtable's history and scalability, using this anecdote to illustrate the contrast between Google's impressive internal engineering and what the author perceives as incompetent external business decisions, particularly concerning Google Cloud's deprecation policies. The author implies that Google's internal processes are far more proactive and helpful than its external-facing ones.

      • I’ll begin with a small but enlightening story from my early days at Google. For the record, I know I’ve said some perhaps unkind things about Google lately, because it’s frustrating when your corporate alma mater makes incompetent business decisions on the regular. But Google’s internal infrastructure is truly extraordinary, and you could argue that there is still none better today. The people who built Google were far better engineers than I will ever be, as this anecdote should serve to illustrate. First a wee bit of background: Google has a storage technology called Bigtable .
      • I’ve ranted about Platforms before, and how important they are, and how Google has never once in their entire corporate history ever really understood what goes into making a successful open Platform, not counting Android or Chrome. Actually I should talk about Android briefly, because you’re probably thinking, hey, what about Android? First, Android is not Google . They have almost nothing to do with each other. Android is a company that was purchased by Google in July 2005, and that company has been allowed to run more or less autonomously, and in fact has remained largely intact through the intervening years.
  • Junior vs Senior - Chris Zempel - Medium
    • This Medium post discusses the differences between junior and senior developers. The author argues that simply using years of experience (3-5 years for junior, 10+ for senior) is insufficient to define the distinction. Instead, they propose three key factors: actual skill (technical ability and learning speed), experience (knowing potential pitfalls), and wisdom (learning from experience). The post emphasizes that time is not the sole determinant of seniority; a developer's ability to learn and apply their knowledge is equally, if not more, important.

      • Well, to start, its useful to lump everyone into three categories. Novice (catch all for brand new or haven’t started), Junior, and Senior. And then, some companies use these titles not as reflection of any objective measure, but rather about your worth as a person and how well you manage office politics. So let’s just categorically eject this portion of usage. Other companies use them as a representation of time.
      • What Does the Map Look Like? An extremely useful starting point is, what labels does the industry itself use, and why? Well, to start, its useful to lump everyone into three categories. Novice (catch all for brand new or haven’t started), Junior, and Senior. And then, some companies use these titles not as reflection of any objective measure, but rather about your worth as a person and how well you manage office politics.
  • An open letter to less experienced developers - HackerNoon.com - Medium
    • This open letter to less experienced developers dispels common misconceptions about software development careers. The author, a seasoned software engineer, argues that coding is continuous learning; those who dislike daily learning should reconsider the field. Experience varies greatly depending on the industry (finance vs. startups, for example), and senior developers' self-deprecation often masks a deep understanding of their specific niche, not a lack of skill. Finally, the author stresses that code itself is less important than the overall software design and functionality – similar to how blueprints are crucial but not the entirety of a building project.

      • Saying that code is the most important thing is like saying the most important part of a new building is the architect’s blueprints. You’re not going to get far without them, but there is a hell of a lot of other stuff an architect has to do to make sure clients, local citizens, authorities, other architects, etc. are all pleased with the building. Nobody won an architect’s prize for a good drawing, and a piece of code that serves a need nobody has or does it in a way that unwittingly leaks personal data or breaks machines is not going to win high praise. Language semantics are the equivalent of the language of an architect’s drawing.
      • Language semantics are the equivalent of the language of an architect’s drawing. Just as how an architect passes drawings to construction workers to realise, we pass our code to interpreters and compilers. Just how some architects want to excel at civil engineering, some coders will get into the working pieces of languages. Just how pre-fabricated houses are good value for money for those who don’t care about architecture per se, you can go a long way with downloading or copying/pasting stuff and stitching it together. Ultimately you have a responsibility as a professional to realise that your code has audience expectations, and it has responsibilities to that audience and others, and that’s why it exists.
  • The End of Programming – Communications of the ACM
    • This Communications of the ACM opinion piece argues that traditional programming will become obsolete. The author, reflecting on the shift from classical algorithms to AI-driven approaches, predicts that AI systems trained rather than programmed will replace most software. While acknowledging the current reliance on data structures and algorithms in computer science education, the author believes this will fundamentally change, with future computer scientists less focused on coding and more on AI system supervision and development. The rapid advancements in AI content generation, such as image generation, are cited as evidence supporting this prediction. The author suggests that AI coding assistants are only the beginning of this transition.

      • Programming will be obsolete. I believe the conventional idea of “writing a program” is headed for extinction, and indeed, for all but very specialized applications, most software, as we know it, will be replaced by AI systems that are trained rather than programmed. In situations where one needs a “simple” program (after all, not everything should require a model of hundreds of billions of parameters running on a cluster of GPUs), those programs will, themselves, be generated by an AI rather than coded by hand. I do not think this idea is crazy. No doubt the earliest pioneers of computer science, emerging from the (relatively) primitive cave of electrical engineering, stridently believed that all future computer scientists would need to command a deep understanding of semiconductors, binary arithmetic, and microprocessor design to understand software.
      • We are rapidly moving toward a world where the fundamental building blocks of computation are temperamental, mysterious, adaptive agents. This shift is underscored by the fact that nobody actually understands how large AI models work. People are publishing research papers 3 , 4 , 5 actually discovering new behaviors of existing large models, even though these systems have been “engineered” by humans. Large AI models are capable of doing things that they have not been explicitly trained to do, which should scare the living daylights out of Nick Bostrom 2 and anyone else worried (rightfully) about an superintelligent AI running amok. We currently have no way, apart from empirical study, to determine the limits of current AI systems.
  • 44
    • This HackerNoon webpage is a collection of announcements and promotions from late 2022 to early 2023. It includes updates on reading statistics, writing contests (with prize money up to $500 per month), merchandise discounts, AI integration (Stable Diffusion), multilingual support, and calls to action to submit stories, vote in polls, and participate in community events like the Noonies awards.

      • 10/26/2022 Highlight any text on a story and HackerNoon will generate beautiful quote images for you to share! 10/26/2022 Don't miss out on the daily top trending stories on HackerNoon! Subscribe to TechBeat to see what people are currently interested about! 09/20/2022 HackerNoon now publishes sci-fi! Read some of our science fiction stories today and submit your own!
      • 11/03/2022 HN Shareholder Newsletter: Green Clock Strikes Noon :-) 10/26/2022 Vote now on HackerNoon weekly polls! 10/26/2022 Highlight any text on a story and HackerNoon will generate beautiful quote images for you to share! 10/26/2022 Don't miss out on the daily top trending stories on HackerNoon! Subscribe to TechBeat to see what people are currently interested about! 09/20/2022 HackerNoon now publishes sci-fi!
  • steve yegge - language-grubbing
    • This blog post discusses the author's year-long experiment exploring various programming languages to increase productivity. He details how he's "been displaced" from his previous main languages (assembly, Java, and Perl) due to hitting limitations. The author then explains the phenomenon of "language communities" and their inherent biases, stemming from the difficulty of mastering languages, the theoretical equivalence of languages, the influence of languages on thinking, and the need for extensive libraries. He also explains the constant emergence of new languages, due to the need for mini-languages to solve specific problems, the difficulty of evolving established languages, and the continuous appearance of new problem domains. Examples of new or altered languages are provided (Stackless Python, AspectJ, Gambit Scheme). The overall tone is reflective and analytical, exploring the dynamics of language choice and evolution in software development.

      • Language Grubbing Stevey's Drunken Blog Rants™ In my spare time for the past year or so, I've conducted a long-running experiment to study a bunch of different languages, hoping to find at least one that makes me more productive. Like, a lot more. I wound up tinkering with at least 20 different languages, and I delved quite deeply into some of them. This doesn't happen very often, I think. Most people don't go grubbing around looking at other languages unless they're brand-new developers looking for an easy way to start building things, or they've been "displaced" from their existing language through some major event.
      • Every five years or so, a major marketing effort pushes some new language into the limelight, and a bunch of people start using it. Usually they're new developers. New developers are the only ones who really matter, at least for marketing purposes. Existing developers don't need or want to change; the more experienced they are, the more locked in they are to their current language, and it becomes a lifelong commitment for most people. So the key to marketing a language is to claim that it's easy to learn.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment