Sokal took too much for granted in his account of his prank. Indeed, his claim---that our publication of his article proves that something is rotten in the state of cultural studies---is as wobbly as the article itself.
… [I]t has been many years since [we] published … [general] debate about postmodern theory…. [W]e read it more as an act of good faith of the sort that might be worth encouraging than as a set of arguments with which we agreed.
Having talked to the (real) Sokal subsequently, we believe that … the [critiques] he intended to air are, at this point, rather well known to [our side]. Indeed, they have been going the rounds … since the first postmodern … critiques of positivism appeared over thirty-five years ago.… Nor are these critiques unfamiliar to folks who have long [debated] the direction of the Left, where positivism has had a long and healthy life. At this point in time, we have a vestigial stake in these critiques and debates, but much less of an interest than Sokal supposes. …[H]e appea