-
-
Save ixs/dbaac42730dea9bd124f26cbd439c58e to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
#!/usr/bin/env python3 | |
# | |
# Simple Intel x520 EEPROM patcher | |
# Modifies the EEPROM to unlock the card for non-intel branded SFP modules. | |
# | |
# Copyright 2020,2021,2022 Andreas Thienemann <andreas@bawue.net> | |
# | |
# Licensed under the GPLv3 | |
# | |
# Based on research described at https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/patching-intel-x520-eeprom-to-unlock-all-sfp-transceivers.24634/ | |
# | |
# Quick explanation of what's going on: | |
# Looking at the Intel driver at e.g. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.8/source/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h#L2140 we can see | |
# that the bit 0x1 at Address 0x58 contains a configuration setting whether the card allows any SFP modules or if Intel specific ones are enforced | |
# by the driver. | |
# | |
# Addr Bitstring | |
# 0x58 xxxxxxx0 means Intel specific SFPs | |
# 0x58 xxxxxxx1 means any SFP is allowed. | |
# | |
# Using the parameter allow_unsupported_sfp for the kernel module we can tell the driver to accept any SFPs. | |
# But this tool will flip the right bit 1 to make that change permanent in the configuration bits in the EEPROM, | |
# thus making kernel module parameters unnecessary. | |
# | |
import subprocess | |
import sys | |
# Supported cards. If your card is supported but not listed here, please add a comment | |
# with your PCI IDs at https://gist.github.com/ixs/dbaac42730dea9bd124f26cbd439c58e | |
card_ids = { | |
"0x10fb": "82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection", | |
"0x154d": "Ethernet 10G 2P X520 Adapter", | |
} | |
try: | |
intf = sys.argv[1] | |
except IndexError: | |
print("%s <interface>" % sys.argv[0]) | |
exit(255) | |
print("Verifying interface %s." % intf) | |
try: | |
with open("/sys/class/net/%s/device/vendor" % intf) as f: | |
vdr_id = f.read().strip() | |
with open("/sys/class/net/%s/device/device" % intf) as f: | |
dev_id = f.read().strip() | |
except IOError: | |
print("Can't read interface data.") | |
exit(2) | |
if vdr_id in ("0x8086"): | |
print("Recognized an Intel manufactured card.") | |
else: | |
print("No Intel manufactured card found.") | |
exit(3) | |
if dev_id in card_ids: | |
print("Recognized the %s card." % card_ids[dev_id]) | |
else: | |
print("No recognized x520-based card found.") | |
exit(3) | |
# Read eeprom at offset 0x58 | |
output = subprocess.check_output( | |
["ethtool", "-e", intf, "offset", "0x58", "length", "1"] | |
).decode("utf-8") | |
# Parse ethtool output and convert the value into a binary string | |
val = output.strip().split("\n")[-1].split()[-1] | |
val_bin = int(val, 16) | |
print("EEPROM Value at 0x58 is 0x%s (%s)." % (val, bin(val_bin))) | |
if val_bin & 0b00000001 == 1: | |
print("Card is already unlocked for all SFP modules. Nothing to do.") | |
exit(1) | |
if val_bin & 0b00000001 == 0: | |
print("Card is locked to Intel only SFP modules. Patching EEPROM...") | |
new_val = val_bin | 0b00000001 | |
print("New EEPROM Value at 0x58 will be %s (%s)" % (hex(new_val), bin(new_val))) | |
# The "magic" value we need in order to write to a intel card is "0x<device_id><vendor_id>" | |
magic = "%s%s" % (dev_id, vdr_id[2:]) | |
cmd = [ | |
"ethtool", | |
"-E", | |
intf, | |
"magic", | |
str(magic), | |
"offset", | |
"0x58", | |
"value", | |
hex(new_val), | |
"length", | |
"1", | |
] | |
print("About to run %s" % " ".join(cmd)) | |
if ( | |
input( | |
"This operation will write data to your ethernet card eeprom. Type 'yes' to confirm: " | |
).lower() | |
!= "yes" | |
): | |
print("Operation aborted.") | |
exit(1) | |
output = subprocess.check_output(cmd).decode("utf-8") | |
if len(output) == 0: | |
print("Sucess!") | |
print("Reboot the machine for changes to take effect...") | |
exit(0) | |
else: | |
print(output) |
Thank you @janipewter for recognizing the need for .decode()
and the initial fix.
Thanks @habibulilalbaab and @bluerockny for a copy-and-paste-able version that attempts to fixe the problem.
I updated the original script keeping subprocess and added a bit nicer output.
Enjoy.
Hi All,
Will this script work in windows environment (like windows 10 or 11) or does this only work in Linux?
Thanks.
Hi All, Will this script work in windows environment (like windows 10 or 11) or does this only work in Linux?
Thanks.
Only Linux
Hi All, Will this script work in windows environment (like windows 10 or 11) or does this only work in Linux?
Thanks.Only Linux
Thanks,
Once I run the script in Linux, will I be able to install it in a windows machine without the SFP+ module (Intel only) limitation?
I am a very newbie, what would be the best OS I can download to run the script? Would it be Ubuntu?
Thanks.
Hi Parhamsan,
When the script flips the bits on the module, the change is permanent.
You can install a small Debian or Ubuntu to make this work. If I understand correctly, you can install that within Windows using the Windows Linux Framework. That way you'll have Linux available any time you need. Great for learning!
Cheers!
Hi All, Will this script work in windows environment (like windows 10 or 11) or does this only work in Linux?
Thanks.Only Linux
Thanks,
Once I run the script in Linux, will I be able to install it in a windows machine without the SFP+ module (Intel only) limitation? I am a very newbie, what would be the best OS I can download to run the script? Would it be Ubuntu?
Thanks.
Yes
@larz99 et al I appreciate the kudos but I want to make clear, this is not my script. All I did was cobble together the contributions of the folks in the posts above. Glad it helped you!