fab.template.js

// this is an example of what the first pass at native (fab) templates will look like:

with ( require( "fab" ) ) fab

  ( listen, 0xFAB )

  ( /\// )

    ( /1/ )
      ( "This is a template with no variables: a unary app" )

    ( /2/ )
      ( "This is a template with {{1}} variable: a binary app." )
        ( "one" )

    ( /3/ )
      ( "This is a template with {{1}} variables: a {{2}} app." )
        ( "two" )
        ( "ternary" )

    ( /4/ )
      ( "You can even {{1}} them!" )
        ( "{{1}} and {{2}}" )
          ( "mix" )
          ( "match" )

    ( "Any feedback appreciated: http://twitter.com/{{1}}" )
      ( "jedschmidt" )

  ( 404 );

it's possible, but the good news is that like most overly-indented code, writing inline functions in (fab) gets awkward really fast. hopefully that'll be enough of a deterrent.

with ( isaacs ) i.am(); is probably better tho.

hmm...

Wouldn't that shirt just say that I'm with myself?

Which I guess is true...

This looks like BS to me. BuildSugar that is. My crazy template experiment.
I'm still not exactly sure if this code style is horrifying or fabulous.

Code: https://gist.github.com/278016/5f3ad4785929905871c4d87826c32bd3f8cff064#file_build_sugar.usage.js
Demo: http://www.jsfiddle.net/c3nxS/1/

What if you want a template with more than 2 variables?

the template app actually creates an n-ary app, where n = the highest variable number + 1.

I'm with (isaacs) too: No with please!