- SEO
- Performance
- Javascript and Accesibility
- Not every search engine crawler execute JS only Google and with Google must not be blocking calls.
/* | |
* This work is free. You can redistribute it and/or modify it under the | |
* terms of the Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License, Version 2, | |
* as published by Sam Hocevar. See the COPYING file for more details. | |
*/ | |
/* | |
* Easing Functions - inspired from http://gizma.com/easing/ | |
* only considering the t value for the range [0, 1] => [0, 1] | |
*/ | |
EasingFunctions = { |
// http://paulirish.com/2011/requestanimationframe-for-smart-animating/ | |
// http://my.opera.com/emoller/blog/2011/12/20/requestanimationframe-for-smart-er-animating | |
// requestAnimationFrame polyfill by Erik Möller. fixes from Paul Irish and Tino Zijdel | |
// MIT license | |
(function() { | |
var lastTime = 0; | |
var vendors = ['ms', 'moz', 'webkit', 'o']; |
I was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long. One thing that struck me immediately about the two companies -- an impression that has been reinforced almost daily -- is that Amazon does everything wrong, and Google does everything right. Sure, it's a sweeping generalization, but a surprisingly accurate one. It's pretty crazy. There are probably a hundred or even two hundred different ways you can compare the two companies, and Google is superior in all but three of them, if I recall correctly. I actually did a spreadsheet at one point but Legal wouldn't let me show it to anyone, even though recruiting loved it.
I mean, just to give you a very brief taste: Amazon's recruiting process is fundamentally flawed by having teams hire for themselves, so their hiring bar is incredibly inconsistent across teams, despite various efforts they've made to level it out. And their operations are a mess; they don't real