Skip to content
View npm3 install performance
I have long wanted to understand what was happening during an `npm install`
I finally now have some data on that.
View index.html
<script src="modifyme.js"></script>
<h1>Testing source map reloading.</h1>
<h3>Open Dev Tools and look in the console.</h3>
<p>Execute the <code>test_sm()</code> function and follow the source links.</p>

What forces layout / reflow

All of the below properties or methods, when requested/called in JavaScript, will trigger the browser to synchronously calculate the style and layout*. This is also called reflow or layout thrashing, and is common performance bottleneck.


Box metrics
  • elem.offsetLeft, elem.offsetTop, elem.offsetWidth, elem.offsetHeight, elem.offsetParent
  • elem.clientLeft, elem.clientTop, elem.clientWidth, elem.clientHeight
  • elem.getClientRects(), elem.getBoundingClientRect()

Option 1: Command-line download extension as zip and extract

extension_id=jifpbeccnghkjeaalbbjmodiffmgedin   # change this ID
curl -L -o "$" "$extension_id%26uc" 
unzip -d "$extension_id-source" "$"

Thx to crxviewer for the magic download URL.

View assembly-2015-1k-winner-prettified.js
function u() {
g = p ?
audio.currentTime * 60 : (
audio = "RIFFdataWAVEfmt " + atob("EAAAAAEAAQAAeAAAAHgAAAEACAA") + "data", = "radial-gradient(circle,#345,#000)", = "fixed", = = "100%",

Just jotting some notes on delivering webfonts performantly…

still an incomplete draft.


  • identify which fonts you NEED for the first render (A), and which you dont (B)
  • you want the network reqs for A to start ASAP. ideally the @font-face req is in a style tag, following CRP guidelines
View gist:43b68a2b6a38ceaaf345

Just some early draft thoughts

Increased modularity is a long-standing request of jQuery. 3.0 should deliver on that. Many authors will use jQuery 3.0 in ES6 codebases, and often alongside frameworks that have overlap in functionality.

That said, a majority of developers will use a monolithic build. jQuery 3.0 must aggressively remove API surface area and functionality from this core build to protect developers from performance footguns. The jQuery team has reasonably voiced concern that removing modules means it's less likely for people to upgrade. While some users do attempt jQuery version upgrades, many freeze their version and never revisit it. I'd like to get more data on this phenomenon as I think we're optimizing API deprecation policy for a small audience.

Lastly, it's 2015 and the gap between JavaScript developers and jQuery developers has never been bigger. Let's bridge that gap. We should encourage the developer to use modern DOM APIs (that don't suck) and polyfill as neccessary.


View bling.js
/* bling.js */
window.$ = document.querySelectorAll.bind(document);
Node.prototype.on = window.on = function (name, fn) {
this.addEventListener(name, fn);
NodeList.prototype.__proto__ = Array.prototype;

console.log wrap resolving for your wrapped console logs

I've heard this before:

What I really get frustrated by is that I cannot wrap console.* and preserve line numbers

We enabled this in Chrome DevTools via blackboxing a bit ago.

If you blackbox the script file the contains the console log wrapper, the script location shown in the console will be corrected to the original source file and line number. Click, and the full source is looking longingly into your eyes.

View debugger.js
var Chrome = require('chrome-remote-interface')
chooseTab: function(tabs) {
var idx = 0
tabs.forEach(function(tab, i) {
if (tab.url === 'http://localhost:9966/')
idx = i
return idx
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.