I currently have a single machine running an ElasticSearch instance that already contains data and some index configurations. I have brought a new node online (a Linux VM) and would like to create a cluster between the master and said new node.
The new Linux node can't seem to establish a connection to my master. The log says
[2012-05-14 11:46:59,891][WARN ][discovery.zen.ping.unicast] [media-node1] failed to send ping to [[#zen_unicast_1#][inet[/153.32.228.250:9300]]]
org.elasticsearch.transport.ReceiveTimeoutTransportException: [][inet[/153.32.228.250:9300]][discovery/zen/unicast] request_id [0] timed out after [3752ms]
at org.elasticsearch.transport.TransportService$TimeoutHandler.run(TransportService.java:347)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
The log seems to indicate that the specified machine might not be reachable, or at least not on the specified port, so from the same Linux node I tried pinging the machine to get its cluster state:
curl -XGET http://153.32.228.250:9200/_cluster/nodes | python -m json.tool
{
"cluster_name": "elasticsearch_media",
"nodes": {
"qUxSLpXNTNyO9jlq9OBf4w": {
"attributes": {
"master": "true"
},
"http": {
"bound_address": "inet[/0.0.0.0:9200]",
"publish_address": "inet[/153.32.228.250:9200]"
},
"http_address": "inet[/153.32.228.250:9200]",
"jvm": {
"mem": {
"heap_init": "256mb",
"heap_init_in_bytes": 268435456,
"heap_max": "1011.2mb",
"heap_max_in_bytes": 1060372480,
"non_heap_init": "23.1mb",
"non_heap_init_in_bytes": 24317952,
"non_heap_max": "130mb",
"non_heap_max_in_bytes": 136314880
},
"pid": 83978,
"start_time": 1337019720794,
"version": "1.6.0_31",
"vm_name": "Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM",
"vm_vendor": "Apple Inc.",
"vm_version": "20.6-b01-415"
},
"name": "media-dev",
"network": {
"refresh_interval": 5000
},
"os": {
"refresh_interval": 1000
},
"process": {
"id": 83978,
"max_file_descriptors": 150000,
"refresh_interval": 1000
},
"transport": {
"bound_address": "inet[/0.0.0.0:9300]",
"publish_address": "inet[/153.32.228.250:9300]"
},
"transport_address": "inet[/153.32.228.250:9300]"
}
}
}
So it at least looks like the master node is reachable by the slave node and is listening on the correct port.
were you able to make this work? this gist is from 2012.. What did you find and how did you fix it? 😥