Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@jessicald
Created June 3, 2012 02:34
Show Gist options
  • Star 17 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save jessicald/2861038 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save jessicald/2861038 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Class vs. Dictionary; or, An Example of Space-Time Tradeoff

Class vs. Dictionary; or, An Example of Space–Time Tradeoff in Python

Conclusions; or, tl;dr

What wins?

  • struct-like objects, i.e. ones that are largely the same as a C struct instance, win in the memory department.
    • These tests do not try to determine what is best for very large sets of values, however; I direct the reader to http://stackoverflow.com/a/2670191 for an insight into that scenario when using a dictionary.
  • Dictionaries beat out objects in access times.
    • According to Wikipedia, the Python dictionary is highly optimised because it is used internally to implement namespaces. [citation needed]

Other notes

  • struct-like objects are apparently easier on memory than dictionaries but are slightly slower to access. They can both serve the exact same purpose, and objects can return their fields as a dictionary with object.__dict__.
  • getattr() and setattr() are slower on objects than the namespace operator.
  • get() and update() are slower on dictionaries than the index operator.
    • dict.update({key: value}) is so much slower than dict[key] = value that it should only be used for updating an existing dictionary with the values in another one. It's simply too expensive for adding or reassigning individual entries.
  • update() seems to expand the hash table of a dictionary more conservatively than other methods of key/value creation, including explicitly making a new dictionary with the exact same entries as another.
  • A class definition takes a considerably higher amount of memory compared to instances of a class. For example, the dict class clocks in at 800 bytes in these tests while the empty dictionary {} only takes 280 bytes. Of course, a definition only has to be loaded once.

Definitions

  • class: a Python class.
  • object: an instance of a class.
  • field: an instance variable of an object; can interchangably refer to a variable and its associated value, or a variable by itself.
  • dictionary: an instance of Python's dict class, which is an implementation of a hash table.
  • entry: a key/value pair in a hash table.
  • method:
    1. a function bound to an object.
    2. an unbound function that accepts an object as (ideally) its first parameter.
  • operator:
    • index: []
    • namespace: .
    • assignment: =
  • gender.py (derived from code in colons/pyfoot/4caf837/conf.py):
class GenderPronouns():
    def __init__(self,
            nom='xe',  # Nominative: she, he, it
            obl='xem',  # Oblique: her, him, it
            pos_det='xyr',  # Possessive, determiner: her, his, its
            pos_pro='xyrs',  # Possessive, predicate: hers, his, its
            reflex='xem'  # Reflexive: herself, himself, itself
            ):
        self.nom = nom
        self.obl = obl
        self.pos_det = pos_det
        self.pos_pro = pos_pro
        self.reflex = reflex

Speed (Time) Tests

Accessing an existing value

Fastest: Accessing a dictionary value through the index operator

$ python3.2 -mtimeit -s"pnoun = {'nom': 'she', 'obl': 'her', 'pos_det': 'her', 'pos_pro': 'hers', 'reflex': 'herself'}" "string = 'blah blah ' + pnoun['obl'] + ' blah blah'"

1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.419 usec per loop

Faster: Accessing an object field through the namespace operator

$ python3.2 -mtimeit -s"from gender import GenderPronouns; pnoun = GenderPronouns('she', 'her', 'her', 'hers', 'herself')" "string = 'blah blah ' + pnoun.obl + ' blah blah'"

1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.446 usec per loop

Slower: Accessing a dictionary value through the get() method

$ python3.2 -mtimeit -s"pnoun = {'nom': 'she', 'obl': 'her', 'pos_det': 'her', 'pos_pro': 'hers', 'reflex': 'herself'}" "string = 'blah blah ' + pnoun.get('obl') + ' blah blah'"

1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.637 usec per loop

Slowest: Accessing an object field through getattr()

$ python3.2 -mtimeit -s"from gender import GenderPronouns; pnoun = GenderPronouns('she', 'her', 'her', 'hers', 'herself')" "string = 'blah blah ' + getattr(pnoun, 'obl') + ' blah blah'"

1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.731 usec per loop

Adding a new field or entry

The relative speeds also hold true for changing the value of an existing field or key.

Fastest: Adding a new entry in an existing dictionary through the assignment and index operators

The first test times the creation of a new dictionary from a copy of the original and the reassignment of a variable that holds it.

This is subtracted from the next test, which recreates and reassigns the dictionary each time to make sure we're always adding a new entry to the dictionary.

$ python3.2 -mtimeit -s"pnoun = {'nom': 'she', 'obl': 'her', 'pos_det': 'her', 'pos_pro': 'hers', 'reflex': 'herself'}; pnoun2 = pnoun.copy()" "pnoun = pnoun2.copy()"

1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.431 usec per loop

$ python3.2 -mtimeit -s"pnoun = {'nom': 'she', 'obl': 'her', 'pos_det': 'her', 'pos_pro': 'hers', 'reflex': 'herself'}; pnoun2 = pnoun.copy()" "pnoun['foo'] = 'a sizeable string'; pnoun = pnoun2.copy()"

1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.957 usec per loop

~0.957 - ~0.431 = ~0.526 usec per loop.

Faster: Adding a new field to an existing object through the namespace operator

The first test times the creation of a GenderPronouns object and the reassignment of a variable that holds one.

This is subtracted from the next test, which recreates and reassigns the object each time to make sure we're always adding a new field to the object.

$ python3.2 -mtimeit -s"from gender import GenderPronouns; pnoun = GenderPronouns('she', 'her', 'her', 'hers', 'herself')" "pnoun = GenderPronouns('she', 'her', 'her', 'hers', 'herself')"

100000 loops, best of 3: 2.17 usec per loop

$ python3.2 -mtimeit -s"from gender import GenderPronouns; pnoun = GenderPronouns('she', 'her', 'her', 'hers', 'herself')" "pnoun.foo = 'a sizeable string'; pnoun = GenderPronouns('she', 'her', 'her', 'hers', 'herself')"

100000 loops, best of 3: 2.9 usec per loop

~2.9 - ~2.17 = 0.73 usec per loop.

Slower: Adding a new field to an existing object through setattr()

$ python3.2 -mtimeit -s"from gender import GenderPronouns; pnoun = GenderPronouns('she', 'her', 'her', 'hers', 'herself')" "setattr(pnoun, 'foo', 'a sizeable string'); pnoun = GenderPronouns('she', 'her', 'her', 'hers', 'herself')"

100000 loops, best of 3: 3.12 usec per loop

~3.12 - ~2.17 = ~0.95 usec per loop.

Slowest: Adding a new entry in an existing dictionary through the update() method

$ python3.2 -mtimeit -s"pnoun = {'nom': 'she', 'obl': 'her', 'pos_det': 'her', 'pos_pro': 'hers', 'reflex': 'herself'}; pnoun2 = pnoun.copy()" "pnoun.update({'foo': 'a sizeable string'}); pnoun = pnoun2.copy()"

100000 loops, best of 3: 2.03 usec per loop

~2.03 - ~0.431 = ~1.599 usec per loop.

Memory (Space) Tests

The following tests were performed in the Python 3.2 interpreter.

The order has been edited for clarity, but the values are unchanged.

Set it up and show that the internal values are the same

>>> from gender import GenderPronouns
>>> pnoun = GenderPronouns('she', 'her', 'her', 'hers', 'herself')
>>> pnoun2 = {'nom': 'she', 'obl': 'her', 'pos_det': 'her', 'pos_pro': 'hers', 'reflex': 'herself'}
>>> pnoun.__dict__ == pnoun2
True

Use getsizeof() to measure the size of objects in octets (8-bit bytes)

getsizeof() shows the size of the object only, i.e. it does not include the sizes of the accompanying fields, keys, or values.

It will however account for the size of a dictionary's hash table.

>>> from sys import getsizeof
...
>>> getsizeof(getsizeof)
72
>>> getsizeof(GenderPronouns)
832
>>> getsizeof(GenderPronouns())
64
>>> getsizeof(dict)
800
>>> getsizeof({})
280
>>> getsizeof(pnoun)
64
>>> getsizeof(pnoun2)
280

Adding one field to the original class

>>> class GenderPronouns2():
...     def __init__(self,
...             nom='xe',
...             obl='xem',
...             pos_det='xyr',
...             pos_pro='xyrs',
...             reflex='xem',
...             foo='a sizeable string'
...             ):
...         self.nom = nom
...         self.obl = obl
...         self.pos_det = pos_det
...         self.pos_pro = pos_pro
...         self.reflex = reflex
...         self.foo = foo
...
>>> getsizeof(GenderPronouns2())
64

Adding two fields to the original class

>>> class GenderPronouns2():
...     def __init__(self,
...             nom='xe',
...             obl='xem',
...             pos_det='xyr',
...             pos_pro='xyrs',
...             reflex='xem',
...             foo='a sizeable string',
...             key='value'
...             ):
...         self.nom = nom
...         self.obl = obl
...         self.pos_det = pos_det
...         self.pos_pro = pos_pro
...         self.reflex = reflex
...         self.foo = foo
...         self.key = key
...
>>> getsizeof(GenderPronouns2())
64

Adding one entry to the original dictionary

>>> pnoun3 = pnoun2.copy()
>>> pnoun3.update({'foo': 'a sizeable string'})
>>> getsizeof(pnoun3)
664
>>> pnoun3 = pnoun3.copy()
>>> getsizeof(pnoun3)
664
update()ing seems to be kinder to the hash table than creating a completely new dict object
>>> pnoun3
{'nom': 'she', 'obl': 'her', 'pos_pro': 'hers', 'foo': 'a sizeable string', 'reflex': 'herself', 'pos_det': 'her'}
>>> pnoun3 = {'nom': 'she', 'obl': 'her', 'pos_pro': 'hers', 'foo': 'a sizeable string', 'reflex': 'herself', 'pos_det': 'her'}
>>> getsizeof(pnoun3)
1048

Adding two entrys to the original dictionary

>>> pnoun3 = pnoun2.copy()
>>> pnoun3.update({'foo': 'a sizeable string'})
>>> pnoun3.update({'key': 'value'})
>>> getsizeof(pnoun3)
664
>>> pnoun3
{'nom': 'she', 'obl': 'her', 'pos_pro': 'hers', 'key': 'value', 'foo': 'a sizeable string', 'reflex': 'herself', 'pos_det': 'her'}
>>> pnoun3 = {'nom': 'she', 'obl': 'her', 'pos_pro': 'hers', 'key': 'value', 'foo': 'a sizeable string', 'reflex': 'herself', 'pos_det': 'her'}
>>> getsizeof(pnoun3)
1048
update()ing is also kinder than creating a new entry via the assignment operator
>>> pnoun3 = pnoun2.copy()
>>> getsizeof(pnoun3)
280
>>> pnoun3['foo'] = 'a sizeable string'
>>> getsizeof(pnoun3)
1048
@alirezapla
Copy link

nice

@antoniogamizbadger
Copy link

Uoh, this is a really nice summary. Love it! Thanks for putting it together.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment