joedevivo / gist:5389301

Last active April 15, 2013


    
    View gist:5389301 
  
  
      gistfile1.txt
    
    
        Raw
      
    
    File suppressed. Click to show.
  
  
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            12
            13
            14
            15
            16
            17
            18
            19
            20
            21
            22
            23
            24
            25
            26
            27
            28
            29
            30
            31
            32
            33
            34
            35
            36
            37
            38
            39
            40
          
          
            *Window A*
➜  ~  erl -name node@127.0.0.1 -setcookie joe
 
*Window B*
# 1, try starting erl with -remsh via open_port
➜  ~  erl                                                                   
Erlang R15B03 (erts-5.9.3.1) [source] [64-bit] [smp:4:4] [async-threads:0] [kernel-poll:false]
 
Eshell V5.9.3.1  (abort with ^G)
1> P = open_port({spawn, "erl -name local@127.0.0.1 -hidden -remsh node@127.0.0.1 -setcookie joe"}, 
1>               [stream, use_stdio, exit_status, binary, stderr_to_stdout]).
#Port<0.517>
2> flush().
Shell got {#Port<0.517>,{data,<<"Eshell V5.9.3.1  (abort with ^G)\n">>}}
Shell got {#Port<0.517>,{data,<<"(local@127.0.0.1)1> ">>}}
ok
3> port_command(P, "node().\n").
true
4> flush().
Shell got {#Port<0.517>,{data,<<"'local@127.0.0.1'\n">>}}
Shell got {#Port<0.517>,{data,<<"(local@127.0.0.1)2> ">>}}
ok
5> q().
ok
 
# 2, run the same command we ran with open_port from the command line
➜  ~  erl -name local@127.0.0.1 -hidden -remsh node@127.0.0.1 -setcookie joe
Erlang R15B03 (erts-5.9.3.1) [source] [64-bit] [smp:4:4] [async-threads:0] [kernel-poll:false]
 
Eshell V5.9.3.1  (abort with ^G)
(node@127.0.0.1)1> node().
'node@127.0.0.1'
(node@127.0.0.1)2> q().
ok
(node@127.0.0.1)3> 
User switch command
 --> q
 
 
THE NODE NAMES ARE DIFFERENT!!!!!