I hear what you are saying man, and to greater and lesser degrees most all of those things are real effects or potential effects in the blast radius of AI.
They are exactly that, though - growing pains. They have to be, because this applied math/tech is not going back in the box. No significant scientific advancement does. And rarely does a major significant scientific advancement realize its potential in the first generation, or without real side effects and social backlash.
The printing press, Darwin’s Evolution, germ theory (sanitization), Turing’s foundational mathematical work (demonized due to his biological research on homosexuality), the electric loom (where we unfortunately invented a whole ass word for the detractors: “Luddites”). Each of these advancements, and many more, met disagreement and (often violent) blowback. This was almost always due to the social implications, instead of the actual science or technology. The plow and irrigation, iron smelting, the sawmill, the cotton gin, the locomoti