I hereby claim:
- I am johnmaeda on github.
- I am maeda (https://keybase.io/maeda) on keybase.
- I have a public key whose fingerprint is 84AF 4067 DAF0 FC8F 0830 7D4F 268C 6C32 B0A2 F196
To claim this, I am signing this object:
A RAI assessment includes stakeholder definitions of direct and indirect types. For example: | |
--- | |
# Direct Stakeholders | |
## End user | |
Who will be evaluated or monitored by the system, whether or not by choice? Who will the system make predictions or recommendations about? E.g., registered customer, patients at X hospital |
The HARMS taxonomy lays out the CATEGORY: TYPE OF HARM, and then gives examples of the kind of harm that can be inflicted. | |
---BEGIN--- | |
## Risk of injury: Physical injury | |
Technology can cause physical harm. | |
| Harm | Description | Consideration(s) | Example | | |
|---|---|---|---| |
Pros | Cons | |
---|---|---|
You're fully aware how difficult the challenge will be. | You may give up because it seems impossible. | |
You leave nobody behind and have full integrity. | You could have been better off leaving somebodies behind. | |
Being grounded in reality makes it all more real. | You can't construct the path forward because reality weighs too heavily. |
Pros | Cons | |
---|---|---|
You're one of the regular people. | Your level of authority is ambiguous. | |
The noise of the 'people' gets fully heard and you totally get it. | You're too deep in the noise and miss the forest from the trees. | |
If you fail then it won't be a big deal. | If you succeed then nobody will really notice. |
Pros | Cons | |
---|---|---|
It's a classic approach that fits your generation. | Folks might not be old-fashioned like you. | |
Your owning accountability as THE leader. | You better be right ... or else. | |
You can dream really big without constraints. | You can easily get ignored by being out of touch. |
I hereby claim:
To claim this, I am signing this object: