Created
December 18, 2017 15:49
-
-
Save kenwebb/0d59ec825e2da41d72214a8aab00e96f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Bipartite Structure of All Complex Networks
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | |
<!--Xholon Workbook http://www.primordion.com/Xholon/gwt/ MIT License, Copyright (C) Ken Webb, Mon Dec 18 2017 10:49:05 GMT-0500 (EST)--> | |
<XholonWorkbook> | |
<Notes><![CDATA[ | |
Xholon | |
------ | |
Title: Bipartite Structure of All Complex Networks | |
Description: | |
Url: http://www.primordion.com/Xholon/gwt/ | |
InternalName: 0d59ec825e2da41d72214a8aab00e96f | |
Keywords: | |
My Notes | |
-------- | |
December 18, 2017 | |
See also my "Hypergraphs" workbook: | |
https://gist.github.com/kenwebb/9e9aa6d9283efb51abb1983f52fa6d55 | |
Clique | |
- perhaps this concept can help me explore the commonality between: | |
- child-parent relationships | |
- pack-cable relationships | |
- Cell Model AO-PO (enyme-small molecule) bipartite relationship | |
References | |
---------- | |
(1) Jean-Loup Guillaume, Matthieu Latapy. Bipartite Structure of All Complex Networks. Information | |
Processing Letters, Elsevier, 2004, 90, pp.Issue 5, Pages 215-221. | |
https://hal-univ-diderot.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00016855/document | |
Cited by 208 | |
Abstract | |
The analysis and modelling of various complex networks has received much at- | |
tention in the last few years. Some such networks display a natural bipartite struc- | |
ture: two kinds of nodes coexist with links only between nodes of different kinds. | |
This bipartite structure has not been deeply studied until now, mainly because it | |
appeared to be specific to only a few complex networks. However, we show here that | |
all complex networks can be viewed as bipartite structures sharing some important | |
statistics, like degree distributions. The basic properties of complex networks can | |
be viewed as consequences of this underlying bipartite structure. This leads us to | |
propose the first simple and intuitive model for complex networks which captures | |
the main properties met in practice. | |
In this communication, we show that all complex networks have an underlying bipartite structure. | |
A bipartite network is a triple G = (⊤, ⊥, E) where ⊤ and ⊥ are two disjoint sets of | |
nodes, respectively the top and bottom nodes, and E ⊆ ⊤ × ⊥ is the set of links of the network. | |
The difference with classical (unipartite) networks lies in the fact that links exist only between top nodes and bottom nodes. | |
(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_network | |
In the context of network theory, a complex network is a graph (network) | |
with non-trivial topological features—features that do not occur in simple networks | |
such as lattices or random graphs but often occur in graphs modelling of real systems. | |
The study of complex networks is a young and active area of scientific research (since 2000) | |
inspired largely by the empirical study of real-world networks such as computer networks, | |
technological networks, brain networks and social networks. | |
(3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clique_(graph_theory) | |
In the mathematical area of graph theory, a clique is a subset of vertices of an undirected graph | |
such that every two distinct vertices in the clique are adjacent; that is, its induced subgraph is complete. | |
Cliques are one of the basic concepts of graph theory and are used in many other mathematical problems and constructions on graphs. | |
A clique, C, in an undirected graph G = (V, E) is a subset of the vertices, C ⊆ V, such that every two distinct vertices are adjacent. | |
This is equivalent to the condition that the induced subgraph of G induced by C is a complete graph. | |
In some cases, the term clique may also refer to the subgraph directly. | |
(4) http://ai2-s2-pdfs.s3.amazonaws.com/81a4/7f57ae029f7413fa96a554e813348eb8ae40.pdf | |
Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks | |
Matthieu Latapy, Clemence Magnien, Nathalie Del Vecchio, 2007 | |
(5) Bipartite graphs as models of complex networks, Jean-Loup Guillaume and Matthieu Latapy | |
(6) http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2041-210X.12139/full | |
A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks, Carsten F. Dormann, Rouven Strauss | |
(7) https://arxiv.org/pdf/0901.2384.pdf | |
An Analysis of the Japanese Credit Network, G. De Masi, Y. Fujiwara, M. Gallegati, B. Greenwald, J. E. Stiglitz, 2010 | |
Many empirical studies have been conducted in the field of bipartite graphs . One can extract | |
two networks from a bipartite network, each one composed by just one kind of nodes: these | |
two networks are called projected networks, since they are obtained as a projection of the initial | |
graph in the subspace composed by nodes of the same kind. | |
(8) https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3e75/ba4243cec50fa3ecf646098bfdd55d9aa437.pdf | |
Data Reduction and Exact Algorithms for Clique, JENS GRAMM, JIONG GUO, FALK HUFFNER, and ROLF NIEDERMEIER, 2010 | |
To cover the edges of a graph with a minimum number of cliques is an NP-hard problem with many | |
applications. We develop for this problem efficient and effective polynomial-time data reduction | |
rules that, combined with a search tree algorithm, allow for exact problem solutions in competitive | |
time. This is confirmed by experiments with real-world and synthetic data. | |
(9) https://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1754.pdf | |
Known algorithms for EDGE CLIQUE COVER are probably optimal, Marek Cygan, Marcin Pilipczuk, Michał Pilipczuk, 2012 | |
]]></Notes> | |
<_-.XholonClass> | |
<!-- domain objects --> | |
<PhysicalSystem/> | |
<Block/> | |
<Brick/> | |
<!-- quantities --> | |
<Height superClass="Quantity"/> | |
</_-.XholonClass> | |
<xholonClassDetails> | |
<Block> | |
<port name="height" connector="Height"/> | |
</Block> | |
</xholonClassDetails> | |
<PhysicalSystem> | |
<Block> | |
<Height>0.1 m</Height> | |
</Block> | |
<Brick multiplicity="2"/> | |
</PhysicalSystem> | |
<Blockbehavior implName="org.primordion.xholon.base.Behavior_gwtjs"><![CDATA[ | |
var a = 123; | |
var b = 456; | |
var c = a * b; | |
if (console) { | |
console.log(c); | |
} | |
]]></Blockbehavior> | |
<Heightbehavior implName="org.primordion.xholon.base.Behavior_gwtjs"><![CDATA[ | |
var myHeight, testing; | |
var beh = { | |
postConfigure: function() { | |
testing = Math.floor(Math.random() * 10); | |
myHeight = this.cnode.parent(); | |
}, | |
act: function() { | |
myHeight.println(this.toString()); | |
}, | |
toString: function() { | |
return "testing:" + testing; | |
} | |
} | |
]]></Heightbehavior> | |
<Brickbehavior implName="org.primordion.xholon.base.Behavior_gwtjs"><![CDATA[ | |
$wnd.xh.Brickbehavior = function Brickbehavior() {} | |
$wnd.xh.Brickbehavior.prototype.postConfigure = function() { | |
this.brick = this.cnode.parent(); | |
this.iam = " red brick"; | |
}; | |
$wnd.xh.Brickbehavior.prototype.act = function() { | |
this.brick.println("I am a" + this.iam); | |
}; | |
]]></Brickbehavior> | |
<Brickbehavior implName="org.primordion.xholon.base.Behavior_gwtjs"><![CDATA[ | |
console.log("I'm another brick behavior"); | |
]]></Brickbehavior> | |
<SvgClient><Attribute_String roleName="svgUri"><![CDATA[data:image/svg+xml, | |
<svg width="100" height="50" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> | |
<g> | |
<title>Block</title> | |
<rect id="PhysicalSystem/Block" fill="#98FB98" height="50" width="50" x="25" y="0"/> | |
<g> | |
<title>Height</title> | |
<rect id="PhysicalSystem/Block/Height" fill="#6AB06A" height="50" width="10" x="80" y="0"/> | |
</g> | |
</g> | |
</svg> | |
]]></Attribute_String><Attribute_String roleName="setup">${MODELNAME_DEFAULT},${SVGURI_DEFAULT}</Attribute_String></SvgClient> | |
</XholonWorkbook> |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment