Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@kevinlin1
Last active July 11, 2023 19:22
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save kevinlin1/ff00adfca9593f27deeb9e4e2c8a0dd6 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save kevinlin1/ff00adfca9593f27deeb9e4e2c8a0dd6 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Learning reference semantics through front and end linked list manipulations.
// Implementer writes this class.
// We haven't written "implements List<E>" (later we might write in the AbstractList)
public class LinkedList<E> {
// Both front and back are class invariants!
// The implementer must always ensure between method calls that
// front points to the first node
// and back points the last node!
// Reference to the first node in the sequence.
private Node front;
// Reference to the last node in the sequence.
private Node back;
// Thinking through arrays vs nodes!
// In array, we would just want to (for addBack) adding to the end-ish in the array.
// Linked Nodes are different! We use references.
// Isn't add like sometimes really slow?
// Don't we have to loop over all the items to get to the end of the list?
// Versus ArrayList.add we could just (if we had space) put it in the empty spot
// Doesn't really live up to the performance claims that we wanted
// There is another linear collection data type called deque that helps emphasize
// the strengths of a linked list; but we'll need more things to make this fast
// You can only add to the front or add to the back of a deque.
// Right now, the addBack code is slow since I might have to LOOP THROUGH THE WHOLE
// LIST. If we restrict ourselves to the deque interface, how might I make things
// faster?
public void addFront(E element) {
if (back == null) {
// In the project, we'll use sentinel nodes to avoid having to do this.
...
}
front = new Node(element, front);
}
public void addBack(E element) {
if (back == null) {
...
}
// Might have to make sure that I'm modifying the correct back!
// Keep track of a reference to that very last node!
back.next = new Node(element);
}
public E removeFront() {
...
}
public E removeBack() {
// In the project, we use prev pointers to make this easier. Why might it be
// helpful to have prev pointers for the remove functions?
...
}
private class Node {
private final E value;
private Node next;
public Node(E value) {
this.value = value;
}
public Node(E value, Node next) {
this.value = value;
this.next = next;
}
}
}
// Client writes this class.
public class MyFinancesApp {
public static void main(String[] args) {
LinkedList<Integer> list = new LinkedList<>();
list.addFront(1); // [1]
list.addFront(0); // [0, 1]
list.addBack(2); // [0, 1, 2]
}
}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment