Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@lakshmantgld

lakshmantgld/Dis-Advantages: AWS Lambda vs Lolo Code

Last active July 13, 2022 08:41
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save lakshmantgld/30b71b57fbbe62568338dcd10da40337 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save lakshmantgld/30b71b57fbbe62568338dcd10da40337 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
Raw
Dis-Advantages: AWS Lambda vs Lolo Code
╔═══════════════════════════════════════╦══════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ AWS Lambda ║ Lolo Code ║
╠═══════════════════════════════════════╬══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ - Cold start is an issue with Lambda ║ - Ability to develop/test code locally and ║
║ If we take the asynchronous use case, ║ the lack of DevOps capabilities is a ║
║ cold start is definitely not an ║ drawback, but as per the docs it is in their ║
║ issue, but only for time-sensitive ║ pipeline. Also, considering the target ║
║ use cases. ║ customers for Lolo, building functions in ║
║ ║ the visual IDE could be a great start. ║
║ - Complicated pricing. Lambdas are ║ ║
║ billed based on execution, memory ║ ║
║ used and invocation time. If we use ║ ║
║ in combination of other services such ║ ║
║ as API Gateway, then those costs also ║ ║
║ add up. Even though, Lambda has a ║ ║
║ generous free tier of 1 million ║ ║
║ invocations/month, other factors make ║ ║
║ it expensive when you have high ║ ║
║ workload throughout the month. ║ ║
║ ║ ║
║ ║ ║
╚═══════════════════════════════════════╩══════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment