Advantages: AWS Lambda vs Lolo Code

╔═══════════════════════════════════════╦════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║               AWS Lambda              ║                  Lolo Code                 ║
╠═══════════════════════════════════════╬════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ - Serverless, thus less operational   ║ - Same as Lambda, Lolo is                  ║
║ management required.                  ║ Serverless too, thus less operational      ║
║                                       ║ management required.                       ║
║ - Infinitely scalable - Developers    ║                                            ║
║ don't have to bother about adding     ║ - Visual Cloud IDE helps the               ║
║ any infra resources during sudden     ║ non-developers and beginners to easily     ║
║ outburst of traffic.                  ║ build backends for their application.      ║
║                                       ║                                            ║
║ - Out-of-box integration with         ║ - Chaining of functions gives great        ║
║ various AWS services making them the  ║ flexibility by splitting the tasks in      ║
║ ideal tool to carry out various       ║ to small modules which can also be         ║
║ asynchronous and automation tasks.    ║ reused in different application.           ║
║                                       ║                                            ║
║ - Supports various runtime and has    ║ - Function library that helps you to       ║
║ lot of 3rd party tools such as        ║ just drag-and-drop and use it in           ║
║ serverless framework that helps in    ║ your application. Once the community       ║
║ carrying out local testing and have   ║ for Lolo starts expanding, We can see      ║
║ proper CI/CD pipeline to automate     ║ a lot of functions for various use cases   ║
║ the deployment operations.            ║ such as building Alexa bot, Telegram bot   ║
║                                       ║ and so on, which is promising.             ║
║                                       ║                                            ║
║ - Cost efficient depending upon the   ║ - Less to no cold start which makes        ║
║ use cases. For trivial asynchronous   ║ them the ideal choice for building         ║
║ and automation tasks within AWS,      ║ serverless backends for                    ║
║ Lambda would be right choice and      ║ customer-facing web and mobile apps.       ║
║ can handle everything within the free ║                                            ║
║ tier.                                 ║ - Generous free-tier plan where we can     ║
║                                       ║ host two applications which can handle     ║
║                                       ║ up to 15K events/second. Straightforward   ║
║                                       ║ pricing too - €9/month for add-on replica. ║
╚═══════════════════════════════════════╩════════════════════════════════════════════╝