-
-
Save lawrencepit/49898 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
# Consider: | |
def parse(*options) | |
if options[0].is_a?(Symbol) | |
if options[0] == :foo | |
"foo!" | |
elsif options[0] == :bar | |
"bar!" | |
elsif options[0] == :force | |
if options[1] == "foo" | |
"foo?" | |
elsif options[1] == "bar" | |
"bar?" | |
elsif options[1] == "foobar" | |
"foobar!" | |
end | |
end | |
elsif options[0].is_a?(Class) | |
options.shift.class_eval { define_method(*options) } | |
else | |
"Something else" | |
end | |
end | |
parse(:force, "foobar") # => foobar! | |
parse(String, :ehlo, lambda {"hello world"}) # => #<Proc:> | |
"erm".ehlo # => hello world | |
# This is a rather simple and silly example, but imagine you have a bit | |
# more complicated possibilities in terms of options and it's conditions: | |
# you'd get ugly looking nested code with lots of case and if-else statements. | |
# And mostly one huge method implementation. | |
# Instead, it would be nicer if it was like this: | |
fun parse(:foo) { "foo! "} | |
fun parse(:bar) { "bar!" } | |
fun parse(:force, "foo") { "foo?" } | |
fun parse(:force, "bar") { "bar?" } | |
fun parse(:force, "foobar") { "foobar!" } | |
fun parse(String, Array) { |klazz, m| klazz.class_eval { define_method(*m) } } | |
fun parse(Object) { "something else" } | |
# This way it looks more clear which conditions are met for a certain | |
# output to occur. You'd call it the same way as before: | |
parse(:force, "foobar") # => foobar! | |
parse(String, :ehlo, lambda {"hello world"}) # => #<Proc:> | |
"erm".ehlo # => hello world | |
# Other possibilities would be | |
fun parse(/^posts/(.*)/edit$/) { |match| puts "Edit post #{match[1]}" } | |
fun parse(:port, Integer) { |sym, port| puts "Received port #{port}"} | |
# etc. | |
# So ruby can't parse the above examples using fun. | |
# However, with some cleverness you could trick ruby into | |
# parsing this, which is what I was looking into. | |
# You'd have to use ruby2ruby and ParseTree. | |
# Alternative you could do it like this: | |
fun :parse, :force, "foobar" { "foobar" } | |
# which does parse straight in ruby, and which | |
# is basically how the functor gem works |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment