Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@leonekmi
Created September 17, 2017 16:07
Show Gist options
  • Save leonekmi/dfdd7c3bb2b897b384ec334900899d4d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save leonekmi/dfdd7c3bb2b897b384ec334900899d4d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Ouh làlà SFR
Starting Nmap 7.60 ( https://nmap.org/ ) at 2017-09-17 18:04 CEST
Nmap scan report for sigjpeigjzpig.com (82.216.111.15)
Host is up (0.014s latency).
rDNS record for 82.216.111.15: portail-front.tech.numericable.fr
Not shown: 998 filtered ports
PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
80/tcp open http Apache httpd
|_http-server-header: Apache
|_http-title: 403 Forbidden
443/tcp open ssl/http Apache httpd
|_http-server-header: Apache
|_http-title: Did not follow redirect to https://www.sfr.fr/
| ssl-cert: Subject: commonName=.numericable.fr
| Subject Alternative Name: DNS:.numericable.fr, DNS:numericable.fr
| Not valid before: 2017-09-06T00:00:00
|_Not valid after: 2018-11-05T23:59:59
|_ssl-date: 2017-09-17T16:04:35+00:00; 0s from scanner time.
Warning: OSScan results may be unreliable because we could not find at least 1 open and 1 closed port
Device type: general purpose|WAP
Running (JUST GUESSING): Linux 2.6.X (96%), D-Link embedded (90%), TRENDnet embedded (90%)
OS CPE: cpe:/o:linux:linux_kernel:2.6 cpe:/h:dlink:dwl-624%2b cpe:/h:dlink:dwl-2000ap cpe:/h:trendnet:tew-432brp
Aggressive OS guesses: Linux 2.6.18 - 2.6.22 (96%), D-Link DWL-624+ or DWL-2000AP, or TRENDnet TEW-432BRP WAP (90%), Linux 2.6.38 (87%)
No exact OS matches for host (test conditions non-ideal).
Network Distance: 5 hops
Service Info: Hosts: portail-front1.nc.sdv.fr, blog.numericable.fr
TRACEROUTE (using port 443/tcp)
HOP RTT ADDRESS
1 8.68 ms 192.168.0.1
2 20.12 ms 10.52.128.1
3 23.99 ms 213-245-253-17.rev.numericable.fr (213.245.253.17)
4 25.25 ms ip-190.net-80-236-5.static.numericable.fr (80.236.5.190)
5 17.11 ms portail-front.tech.numericable.fr (82.216.111.15)
OS and Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at https://nmap.org/submit/ .
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 25.99 seconds
@luclu7
Copy link

luclu7 commented Sep 18, 2017

doesn't seems legit.

Starting Nmap 7.40 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2017-09-18 19:09 CEST
Failed to resolve "sigjpeigjzpig.com".
WARNING: No targets were specified, so 0 hosts scanned.
Nmap done: 0 IP addresses (0 hosts up) scanned in 1.30 seconds

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment