Last active
August 29, 2015 14:17
-
-
Save leongersing/576a20a48e6a5270b2fc to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Function Sets in Ruby
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
set = ->(int){ int > -1000 && int < 1000 } | |
contains = ->(setFn, int){ setFn.(int) } | |
sset = ->(y){ ->(x){ x == y } } | |
union = ->(s1, s2){ ->(x){ s1.(x) || s2.(x) } } | |
intersect = ->(s1, s2){ ->(x){ s1.(x) && s2.(x) } } | |
diff = ->(s1, s2){ ->(x){ s1.(x) && !s2.(x) } } | |
filter = ->(s, p){ ->(x){ p.(x) && s.(x) } } | |
# forall is bounded by the rules of the docs... | |
# "Here, we consider that an integer x has the property -1000 <= x <= 1000 in order to limit the search space." | |
ubound = 1000 | |
lbound = -1000 | |
forall = ->(s, p){ | |
iter = ->(x){ | |
if x > ubound | |
return true | |
elsif contains.(s, x) | |
return false unless p.(x) | |
end | |
iter.(x+1) | |
} | |
iter.(lbound) | |
} | |
exists = ->(s, p){ | |
iter = ->(x){ | |
if x > ubound | |
return false | |
elsif contains.(s, x) | |
return true if p.(x) | |
end | |
iter.(x+1) | |
} | |
iter.(lbound) | |
} | |
map = ->(s, f){ | |
iter = ->(ms, x){ | |
if x > ubound | |
return ms.nil? ? ->(x){ false } : ms | |
elsif s.(x) | |
new_set = ms.nil? ? sset.(f.(x)) : union.(ms, sset.(f.(x))) | |
iter.(new_set, x+1) | |
else | |
iter.(ms, x+1) | |
end | |
} | |
iter.(nil, lbound) | |
} | |
describe "functional sets" do | |
it "set" do | |
expect( set.(1) ).to eq true | |
end | |
it "singleton_set" do | |
set1 = sset.(1) | |
expect( contains.(set1, 1) ).to eq true | |
expect( contains.(set1, 2) ).to eq false | |
end | |
it "union" do | |
expect( contains.( union.( sset.(1), sset.(2) ), 1 ) ).to eq true | |
expect( contains.( union.( sset.(1), sset.(2) ), 2 ) ).to eq true | |
expect( contains.( union.( sset.(1), sset.(2) ), 3 ) ).to eq false | |
end | |
it "union of union" do | |
u1t4 = union.( union.( sset.(1), sset.(2) ), union.( sset.(3), sset.(4) ) ) | |
expect( contains.(u1t4, 0) ).to eq false | |
expect( contains.(u1t4, 1) ).to eq true | |
expect( contains.(u1t4, 2) ).to eq true | |
expect( contains.(u1t4, 3) ).to eq true | |
expect( contains.(u1t4, 4) ).to eq true | |
expect( contains.(u1t4, 5) ).to eq false | |
end | |
it "intersect" do | |
s1n2 = union.( sset.(1), sset.(2) ) | |
s1t4 = union.( s1n2, union.( sset.(3), sset.(4) ) ) | |
expect( contains.( intersect.( s1n2, s1t4 ), 1) ).to eq true | |
expect( contains.( intersect.( s1n2, s1t4 ), 2) ).to eq true | |
expect( contains.( intersect.( s1n2, s1t4 ), 3) ).to eq false | |
expect( contains.( intersect.( s1n2, s1t4 ), 4) ).to eq false | |
end | |
it "diff" do | |
s1n2 = union.( sset.(1), sset.(2) ) | |
s1n3 = union.( sset.(1), sset.(3) ) | |
expect( contains.( diff.( s1n2, s1n3 ), 1) ).to eq false | |
expect( contains.( diff.( s1n2, s1n3 ), 2) ).to eq true | |
expect( contains.( diff.( s1n2, s1n3 ), 3) ).to eq false | |
end | |
it "filter" do | |
s1t4 = union.( union.( sset.(1), sset.(2) ), union.( sset.(3), sset.(4) ) ) | |
s2n4 = filter.( s1t4, ->(x){ x.even? } ) | |
expect( contains.(s2n4, 1) ).to eq false | |
expect( contains.(s2n4, 2) ).to eq true | |
expect( contains.(s2n4, 3) ).to eq false | |
expect( contains.(s2n4, 4) ).to eq true | |
end | |
it "forall" do | |
s1t4 = union.( union.( sset.(1), sset.(2) ), union.( sset.(3), sset.(4) ) ) | |
expect( forall.( s1t4, ->(x){ x > 0 } ) ).to eq true | |
expect( forall.( s1t4, ->(x){ x < 0 } ) ).to eq false | |
end | |
it "exists" do | |
s1t4 = union.( union.( sset.(1), sset.(2) ), union.( sset.(3), sset.(4) ) ) | |
expect( exists.( s1t4, ->(x){ x.even? } ) ).to eq true | |
expect( exists.( s1t4, ->(x){ x.odd? } ) ).to eq true | |
expect( exists.( s1t4, ->(x){ x.zero? } ) ).to eq false | |
end | |
it "maps" do | |
s1t4 = union.( union.( sset.(1), sset.(2) ), union.( sset.(3), sset.(4) ) ) | |
expect( map.(s1t4, ->(x){ x * 2 }).(1) ).to eq false | |
expect( map.(s1t4, ->(x){ x * 2 }).(2) ).to eq true | |
expect( map.(s1t4, ->(x){ x * 2 }).(3) ).to eq false | |
expect( map.(s1t4, ->(x){ x * 2 }).(4) ).to eq true | |
expect( map.(s1t4, ->(x){ x * 2 }).(5) ).to eq false | |
expect( map.(s1t4, ->(x){ x * 2 }).(6) ).to eq true | |
expect( map.(s1t4, ->(x){ x * 2 }).(7) ).to eq false | |
expect( map.(s1t4, ->(x){ x * 2 }).(8) ).to eq true | |
end | |
it "maps maps" do | |
s1t4 = union.( union.( sset.(1), sset.(2) ), union.( sset.(3), sset.(4) ) ) | |
my_set = map.( map.(s1t4, ->(x){ x * 2 }), ->(x){ x * x } ) | |
expect( my_set.(4) ).to eq true | |
expect( my_set.(16) ).to eq true | |
expect( my_set.(36) ).to eq true | |
expect( my_set.(64) ).to eq true | |
expect( my_set.(100) ).to eq false | |
end | |
it "passes Nate's test" do | |
nset = ->(x){ [1,2,3].include? x } | |
expect( nset.(0) ).to eq false | |
expect( nset.(1) ).to eq true | |
expect( nset.(2) ).to eq true | |
expect( nset.(3) ).to eq true | |
expect( nset.(4) ).to eq false | |
mapped_set = map.( nset, ->(x){ x * 2 }) | |
expect( mapped_set.(0) ).to eq false | |
expect( mapped_set.(1) ).to eq false | |
expect( mapped_set.(2) ).to eq true | |
expect( mapped_set.(3) ).to eq false | |
expect( mapped_set.(4) ).to eq true | |
expect( mapped_set.(5) ).to eq false | |
expect( mapped_set.(6) ).to eq true | |
expect( mapped_set.(7) ).to eq false | |
expect( mapped_set.(8) ).to eq false | |
end | |
end |
@mattbaker can we get a problem description for your claim $300 challenge?
@leongersing why the hell is @ mentioning on gists not working? WHO BUILT THIS THING ANYWA?!
@mattbaker now it all makes sense. I'll keep working on it. 👍
@mikelikesbikes .... no comment. 😉
Pretty sure that $300 bounty (gulp! this is getting real) was for an unbounded set.
yeah, I was so 🍻 🍻 🍻 I couldn't remember what the hell we agreed to. ATM this is my favorite happy distraction. 😄
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Cool, so the question we were discussing was whether this is possible without the bound. It seems people often feel like it should be, but ultimately decide it's impossible. I'm convinced it can't be done!