Created
April 3, 2013 15:42
-
-
Save manuel-rubio/5302361 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
#!/usr/bin/env escript | |
epoch() -> | |
{Mega,Sec,Mili} = now(), | |
(Mega * 1000000) + Sec + (Mili / 1000000). | |
measure(F) -> | |
Ini = epoch(), | |
F(), | |
epoch() - Ini. | |
main(_Args) -> | |
Times = lists:seq(1,1000000), | |
Test1 = fun() -> [ os:timestamp() || _ <- Times ] end, | |
Test2 = fun() -> [ now() || _ <- Times ] end, | |
io:format("os:timestamp = ~5.2f ~5.2f ~5.2f~n", [ | |
measure(Test1), measure(Test1), measure(Test1) | |
]), | |
io:format("erlang:now = ~5.2f ~5.2f ~5.2f~n", [ | |
measure(Test2), measure(Test2), measure(Test2) | |
]), | |
0. |
Adding the:
-mode(compile).
As in this fork: https://gist.github.com/legoscia/5303050
The results are very different. The better results are os:timestamp().
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In this case erlang:now() is fater than os:timestamp(), but if we try in a concurrent fashion:
https://gist.github.com/manuel-rubio/5303075
The results are the opposite.