exercism.markdown

##Hello World My code: here

• Responder #1 (here) - This responder took largely the same approach as me but used the if / else approach rather than reassigning input to equal either the given input or World. In this case I feel that I prefer my approach.

• Responder #2 (here) - Responder 2 took a similar approach to Responder 1, but they simply used an if statement with an implied else. I'm not sure if I prefer this over the traditional if / else approach. Again, I prefer my approach.

• Responder #3 (here) - I really like this implementation. I'm not sure if the conditional, or ternary, operator is more clear, but I like the approach.

• Responder #4 (here) - Again, I really like this approach. I find it clean and easy to read. Also, I like how they are utilizing ES6. This is my favorite implementation so far.

• Responder #5 (here) - This approach is similar to the solution of Responder 1 and Responder 2. Not much to add.

##Leap My code: here

• Responder #1 (here) - The logic of this person's solution is not that different than mine, but I actually like how they divided into multiple if statements. I find it very clear and concise.

• Responder #2 (here) - I find this person's response clear and it is very similar to Responder 1's solution.

• Responder #3 (here) - I think it is best to avoid nested if statements if possible.

• Responder #4 (here) - It looks like this person took the same approach as I did. I actually prefer Responder 1's implementation the best so far given how easy it is to read.

• Responder #5 (here) - I like how this person made an attempt to make their code easier to read by using variables.

##Hamming My code: here

• Responder #1 (here) - It looks like this person took a similar approach, except I used charAt. Different, but the logic is the same.

• Responder #2 (here) - This approach has similar logic, but it uses nest if statements. Again, I think these should be avoided if possible.

• Responder #3 (here) - I like how this solution uses forEach rather than a for loop, but I find it a bit difficult to read. I think a for loop is easier to follow for this problem.

• Responder #4 (here) - This person's response if very close to Responder 1's solution. Not much to add.

• Responder #5 (here) - This is definitely a unique solution. I like how they were able to squeeze in both the conditional, or ternary, operator and forEach with split. I'm not sure if this is the cleanest approach, but I find it interesting.