tap-targets-status.md

Reddit – 26% appropriately sized tap targets

The header isn't scored because it's position absolute, will fix that later by introducing elementAtPoint to check if a tap target is visible

Google Search – 98% appropriately sized tap targets

Also misses some tap target that are position absolute:

There's a lot of tap fingers here because the outer rect is partially hidden by the scroll container and therefore we ignore it. I've not seen it cause a false result yet though. The fingers are all for the same tap target but having extra fingers could introduce a failure over having one central finger.

One failing target is correctly identified, fails because the "Sign in" link is very small

Wikipedia article: 94% appropriately sized tap targets

Also misses some tap target that are position absolute (in the edit icons bar)

Illustrates our nodeIsInTextBlock algorithm, which depends on other text content around the link:

This similarly depends on text block detection, but is fairly reasonable overall:

CNN: 88% appropriately sized tap targets

Some footer links are identified as a text block, others aren't.

Lighthouse: 45% appropriately sized tap targets

Footer links fail with an overlap score of exactly 0.25

Twitter: 84% appropriately sized tap targets