A template for a “1 pager” or short description of a digital humanities project. Based on the case study descriptions from the book Digital_Humanities.
- Main title & subtitle
- 2 to 3 sentence abstract
- Introduce the problem area.
"Certain mystes aver that the real world has been constructed by the | |
human mind, since our ways are governed by the artificial categories | |
into which we place essentially undifferentiated things, things | |
weaker than our words for them. | |
... | |
We believe that we invent symbols. The truth is that they invent | |
us; we are their creatures, shaped by their hard, defining edges. | |
When soldiers take their oath they are given a coin, an asimi | |
stamped with the profile of the Autarch. Their acceptance of that | |
coin is their acceptance of the special duties and burdens of |
Wayne: What is it? | |
Stacy: It's a GIT hub. | |
Wayne: A GIT hub... a GIT hub. Shyeah, Right! I don't even own | |
A GIT, let alone many GITs that would necessitate an entire hub. | |
What am I gonna do... with a GIT hub? |
<!DOCTYPE html> | |
<meta charset="utf-8"> | |
<style> | |
</style> | |
<body> | |
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/d3/2.10.0/d3.v2.min.js"></script> | |
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.4.2/underscore-min.js"></script> | |
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.3/jquery.min.js"></script> |
A template for a “1 pager” or short description of a digital humanities project. Based on the case study descriptions from the book Digital_Humanities.
. | |
x | |
.X, | |
cNMk . | |
,OMWdO. ', | |
0MMd 'l .:Oc | |
'MMM. x ..xMMK . | |
.oWMWo cl'';OMMMW, ;o' | |
l .lkWMKc. .;x:0MMMMMMMOl;'.'oXl ' . | |
cMc :W: ';xMMMMMMMMWKkockWMX. l ;' |
So this turned into a some kinda bloggy post thing. I can't vouch for any the ideas in here because I'm hopped up on caffeine and ibuprofen.
Garfinkel's classic "trust" paper which discusses how sociologists and practically engage trust as something observable and reportable. It is fundamentally a discussion about method, and how formal analytic/theory, cannot make render visible issues of trust. I think this speaks directly to Alan's point that humanities have no methods for engaging trust: [Garfinkel, H. (1963), 'A Conception of, and Experiments with 'Trust' as a Condition of Stable Concerted Actions', in Harvey, O. J. (ed), Motivation and Social Interaction, New York: Ronald Press, 187-238.](http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=c6Quh3jbt8YC&oi=fnd&pg=PA379&dq=garfinkel+trust&ots=HoNZhYSWX8&sig=degJPylllzk_I4R00YPlpUJPu-c#v=onepage&q
"Us" being scholars presenting at the 2013 annual meeting of the Society for the Social Studies of Science. The map being a representation of the number of folks at the conference by country. The darker the red, the more people from institutions in that country will be showing up in lovely San Diego in October (presumably).
The United States of America has a strong showing, Antartica does not.
The data for this visualization was collected by:
------------ BEGIN WORKFLOW ------------ | |
{ | |
"actions" : [ | |
{ | |
"class" : "WorkflowActionGetFileName", | |
"pauseBeforeRunning" : false, | |
"customTitle" : "", | |
"parameters" : { | |
"includeExtension" : true, | |
"includeFolder" : false |
------------ BEGIN WORKFLOW ------------ | |
{ | |
"actions" : [ | |
{ | |
"class" : "WorkflowActionCustom", | |
"pauseBeforeRunning" : false, | |
"customTitle" : "citekey-insert", | |
"parameters" : { | |
"8735E7DC-D0F4-4DB1-AAB7-4F9A72AC141D" : { | |
"tokenRanges" : { |