Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@mhtvsSFrpHdE

mhtvsSFrpHdE/SoftEther VPN Data Compression performance benchmark.md

Last active May 12, 2023 22:49
Show Gist options
  • Star 0 You must be signed in to star a gist
  • Fork 0 You must be signed in to fork a gist
  • Save mhtvsSFrpHdE/e9fef31848d406366d21018abf528217 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save mhtvsSFrpHdE/e9fef31848d406366d21018abf528217 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
SoftEther VPN Data Compression performance benchmark
Raw
SoftEther VPN Data Compression performance benchmark.md

Image saved as base64 and embed to markdown file
GitHub not show this kind of image, go to comment below to view image

Test environment: LAN
UDP: Don't know, Disable UDP Acceleration is not selected
VPN Server: Intel Core i5-9400F
Samba Server: Intel Celeron N4500
Client: Intel Xeon E3-1231v3

No SSL / Compression on both side

No SSL / Compression only Samba to VPN Server

No SSL / Compression only VPN Server to Client

No SSL / No Compression

SSL / No Compression

No VPN (Direct connection between Samba and Client)

Conclusion: In LAN environment, connect Samba and Client as direct as possible.
Add VPN Compression won't increase performance if router total bandwidth is limited.

@mhtvsSFrpHdE
Copy link
Author

mhtvsSFrpHdE commented May 12, 2023 •
edited

No SSL / Compression on both side

No SSL / Compression only Samba to VPN Server

No SSL / Compression only VPN Server to Client

No SSL / No Compression

SSL / No Compression

No VPN (Direct connection between Samba and Client)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment