I work as a full-stack developer at work. We are a Windows & Azure shop, so we are using Windows as our development platform, hence this customization.
For my console needs, I am using Cmder which is based on ConEmu with PowerShell as my shell of choice.
Yes, yes, I know nowadays you can use the Linux subsystem on Windows 10 which allow you to run Ubuntu on Windows. If you are looking for customization of the Ubuntu bash shell, check out this article by Scott Hanselman.
| function SetPowerPlan([string]$PreferredPlan) | |
| { | |
| Write-Host "Setting Powerplan to $PreferredPlan" | |
| $guid = (Get-WmiObject -Class win32_powerplan -Namespace root\cimv2\power -Filter "ElementName='$PreferredPlan'").InstanceID.tostring() | |
| $regex = [regex]"{(.*?)}$" | |
| $newpowerVal = $regex.Match($guid).groups[1].value | |
| # setting power setting to high performance | |
| powercfg -S $newpowerVal | |
| } |
| /* | |
| I've compiled a list of angular directives according to their priorities (from most priority to lesser priority). | |
| Also, terminal property is included for each directive that asserts it | |
| */ | |
| ng-switch 1200 | |
| ng-repeat 1000 terminal | |
| ng-if 600 terminal | |
| ng-controller 500 | |
| ng-init 450 |
##knife windows fails
If you want to use the Chef knife windows, you must be able to run WinRM. WinRM needs to be installed, and then configured correctly.
it is easy to configure winrm quickconfig -q but that may fail, and on Winodws 8 the fix is non obvious:
PS C:\Windows\system32> winrm quickconfig -q
WinRM service is already running on this machine.
WSManFault
Message
| namespace Newtonsoft.Json.Converters | |
| open Microsoft.FSharp.Reflection | |
| open Newtonsoft.Json | |
| open System | |
| type IdiomaticDuConverter() = | |
| inherit JsonConverter() | |
| [<Literal>] |
| <Query Kind="Program" /> | |
| private string[] projectExtensionExclusions = new[] { ".vdproj", ".ndproj", ".wdproj", ".shfbproj" }; | |
| private string rootFolder = @"C:\Users\Pascal\Dev\MyProject"; | |
| void Main() | |
| { | |
| LoadAllProjects(); | |
| LoadAllPackagesConfig(); | |
| GenerateDGML(Path.Combine(rootFolder, "Dependencies.dgml")); |
| public class FeatureViewLocationRazorViewEngine : RazorViewEngine | |
| { | |
| public FeatureViewLocationRazorViewEngine() | |
| { | |
| ViewLocationFormats = new[] | |
| { | |
| "~/Features/{1}/{0}.cshtml", | |
| "~/Features/{1}/{0}.vbhtml", | |
| "~/Features/Shared/{0}.cshtml", | |
| "~/Features/Shared/{0}.vbhtml", |
I was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long. One thing that struck me immediately about the two companies -- an impression that has been reinforced almost daily -- is that Amazon does everything wrong, and Google does everything right. Sure, it's a sweeping generalization, but a surprisingly accurate one. It's pretty crazy. There are probably a hundred or even two hundred different ways you can compare the two companies, and Google is superior in all but three of them, if I recall correctly. I actually did a spreadsheet at one point but Legal wouldn't let me show it to anyone, even though recruiting loved it.
I mean, just to give you a very brief taste: Amazon's recruiting process is fundamentally flawed by having teams hire for themselves, so their hiring bar is incredibly inconsistent across teams, despite various efforts they've made to level it out. And their operations are a mess; they don't real
| # robocopy.rb | |
| class Robocopy | |
| attr_accessor :source, :target, :excludeDirs, :includeFiles, :logPath | |
| def run() | |
| robocopy = "robocopy.exe " \ | |
| "\"#{@source}\" " \ | |
| "\"#{@target}\" " \ |