Mizunashi Mana has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to MPL Notice Template.
-
-
Save mizunashi-mana/0c74ff000830f48cb2881cb686f95b06 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
You must read this notice before distributing any copies of files of this project or module.
This project or module is dual-licensed under the Mozilla Public License 2.0 (at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/) and the Apache License 2.0 (at https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0).
This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
By definition 1.4 of the Mozilla Public License 2.0, the above notice means all of files of this project or module are included in "Covered Software". If anyone distributes just a copy of a file of this project or module by the Mozilla Public License 2.0, he or she may add this notice by any reasonable method (e.g. as a comment) instead of attached this document.
@falsandtru Thanks for more review. Your proposals are all rights. I updated this template.
I restored copyright ownership for the Apache License 2.0 (for the MPL 2.0, this badge is not necessary just as @falsandtru said).
FYI, I'm going to use the following notice.
Notice
You must read this notice before distributing any copies of files of this project or module.
Source
The source project is https://github.com/falsandtru/spica.
License
This project or module is dual-licensed under the Mozilla Public License 2.0 and the Apache License 2.0.
Mozilla Public License 2.0
This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
It is my fault. That point is fixed with the latest revision, never mind.
Maybe you shouldn't use markdown syntax such as link syntax in text for readability.
Apache License 2.0 may be more formal.
Should use the same representation "Mozilla Public License 2.0".
Probably we have to use more correct representation such as "licenser" instead of "you".